Safety and Effectiveness of the Peregrine Drivable ENT Scope for Endoscopy of the Paranasal Sinuses

September 21, 2021 updated by: Joshua M. Levy, Emory University

Safety and Effectiveness Evaluation of the Peregrine Drivable ENT Scope for Office Endoscopy of the Paranasal Sinuses in Patients Who Underwent ESS

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and effectiveness of the Peregrine endoscope in patients in the office setting in terms of access into and visualization of the paranasal sinus anatomy, image quality, patient tolerability and clinical utility. Up to 30 participants who have had prior endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) and are scheduled for nasal endoscopy in the office as part of a routine post-operative office visit or due to recurrence of symptoms, will be evaluated with the Peregrine Endoscope as well as a standard endoscope. This study aims to:

  • compare visualization success rates of the paranasal sinus anatomy by Peregrine and by a standard endoscope used in the office setting.
  • examine device related adverse events.
  • assess the adequacy of the image quality of Peregrine for endoscopy procedures in the office.
  • evaluate patient tolerability and pain

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Nasal endoscopy is a minimally invasive, diagnostic medical procedure and currently the most preferred initial method of evaluating medical problems affecting nose and sinuses such as nasal stuffiness and obstruction, sinusitis, nasal polyposis, nasal tumors, epistaxis, recurrent bouts of sneezing and rhinorrhea. Overall, the procedure is considered very safe and low-risk. Currently, nasal endoscopy can be performed with a flexible or rigid endoscope, typically after a topical decongestant and anesthetic are applied to the nasal mucosa.

Reprocessing is an issue of concern, especially for flexible endoscopes where multiple steps were confirmed to be critical for reprocessing to be effective. High-level disinfection has been determined to be the minimum level of disinfection required, which involves multiple steps including manual cleaning, leak testing, cleaning with an enzymatic agent, high-level disinfection, and drying with vertical storage. 3NT Medical Ltd. has developed the Peregrine Drivable Ear Nose and Throat (ENT) Scope, which offers the convenience of a single-use endoscope component coupled with performance characteristics of commercially available state-of-the-art reusable endoscopy systems. The single-use endoscope essentially removes concerns related to burdensome reprocessing techniques of a delicate tool required to achieve high-level of its disinfection.

The objective of this study is to assess the safety and performance of the Peregrine endoscope in patients in the office setting in terms of access and visualization of the paranasal sinus anatomy, image quality, and patient tolerability and pain. For this study, up to 30 patients who have had prior endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) and who are scheduled for nasal endoscopy in the office, as part of a routine post-operative office visit or due to recurrence of symptoms, will be evaluated with Peregrine Endoscope. Access and visualization by an additional standard endoscope will be conducted and compared to Peregrine endoscope. Image quality of the Peregrine endoscope, participant tolerability and pain, and the impact of Peregrine on clinical decision making will be evaluated.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

6

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30308
        • Emory Hospital Midtown

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • A male or female patient who has had prior ESS and who is indicated for office endoscopy by the ENT specialist
  • A patient who is able to understand the requirements of the study, is willing to comply with its instructions and schedules, and agrees to sign the informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any medical disorder which in the investigator's judgment contraindicates the patient's participation
  • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Standard 30° 4mm Endoscope Followed by Peregrine Endoscope
Participants will receive an endoscopy with the standard 30° 4mm endoscope followed by an endoscopy with the Peregrine Drivable ENT Scope.
Peregrine, developed by 3NT Medical, is a single-use disposable handheld endoscope, which is thinner and more flexible than other endoscopes. The endoscope includes a camera at its end and a working channel. The thin endoscope provides a means to visualize the nasal cavity and paranasal sinus space and to deliver irrigation to treat the sinus ostia (drainage openings) and spaces within the paranasal sinus cavities
The Standard 30° 4mm endoscopic sinus evaluation is the standard procedure that would normally be used to evaluate the condition of each participant.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Visualization Success of Maxillary Sinus Anatomy
Time Frame: Day 1 (after each endoscopy)
The ability of each endoscope type to visualize the maxillary sinus anatomy (ostium, floor, lateral recess, anterior wall) was assessed as being a success or failure.
Day 1 (after each endoscopy)
Number of Participants With Visualization Success of Frontal Sinus Anatomy
Time Frame: Day 1 (after each endoscopy)
The ability of each endoscope type to visualize the frontal sinus anatomy (ostium, posterior table, anterior table, lateral recess) was assessed as being a success or failure.
Day 1 (after each endoscopy)
Number of Participants With Visualization Success of Sphenoid Sinus Anatomy
Time Frame: Day 1 (after each endoscopy)
The ability of each endoscope type to visualize the sphenoid sinus anatomy (ostium, sella, floor, lateral aspect) was assessed as being a success or failure.
Day 1 (after each endoscopy)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Adequate or Inadequate Image Quality From Peregrine Endoscopy
Time Frame: Day 1 (after each endoscopy)
Image quality will be assessed through a yes/no statement, reported by physicians, regarding the adequacy of the Peregrine image quality for making clinical decisions in the office setting.
Day 1 (after each endoscopy)
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Tolerability Score
Time Frame: Day 1 (after each endoscopy)
Participant tolerability was evaluated through validated VAS for both endoscopies. Scores range from 1 to 10, where 1 = highly tolerable and 10 = not tolerable.
Day 1 (after each endoscopy)
VAS Pain Score
Time Frame: Day 1 (after each endoscopy)
Participant pain was evaluated through validated VAS for both endoscopies. Scores range from 1 to 10, where 1 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as it could be.
Day 1 (after each endoscopy)
Impact on Clinical Workflow
Time Frame: Day 1 (after each endoscopy)
The impact on clinical workflow of visual information obtained by each endoscope procedures was rated by physicians on a 5-point scale where 1 = worst and 5 = best.
Day 1 (after each endoscopy)
Ease of Use
Time Frame: Day 1 (after each endoscopy)
The ease of use of each endoscope procedure was rated by physicians on a 5-point scale where 1 = worst and 5 = best.
Day 1 (after each endoscopy)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Joshua Levy, MD, Emory University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 5, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 18, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 18, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

September 19, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 15, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 21, 2021

Last Verified

September 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB00110282

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

All individual participant data collected during the trial and after deidentification will be available for sharing.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be available for sharing immediately following the embargo period associated with publication.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data will be available for sharing with primary investigators at academic institutions for the purposes of meta-analysis or nested studies with agreed publication plan. Data can be requested by contacting the study team and completing a data sharing agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sinus Problem

3
Subscribe