Safe Infusion Device in Reducing Occupational Exposure of Nurses (CONTAMOINS-1)

September 23, 2019 updated by: Institut de Cancérologie de la Loire

Evaluation of a Safe Infusion Device in Reducing Occupational Exposure of Nurses to Antineoplastic Drugs: a Comparative Prospective Study. CONTAMOINS-1

Monocentric comparative before / after study to evaluate the efficacy of Safe Infusion Devices (SIDs) in reducing drug exposure to nurses compared to usual perfusion practices.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Despite the decreasing of environmental contamination throughout the anticancer drug circuit, the administration of chemotherapies remains at risk of occupational exposure for nurses. Many medical devices aim at securing administration, but none have been scientifically evaluated to verify the actual improvement.

A monocentric comparative before / after study was carried out in an oncology day hospital in order to evaluate the efficacy of Safe Infusion Devices in reducing drug exposure compared to usual perfusion practices (neutral solvent-purged infusers). The rate of nurses' gloves contamination was estimated. The eligible protocols must contain at least one disconnection step and one of the 10 drugs screened. To avoid false negatives, each sample of gloves was contaminated with a drop of topotecan. Association between contamination and other variables was investigated using a multivariate regression analysis.

The usual practice leaded to a rate of 58.3% of contaminated samples while Safe Infusion Devices to a rate of 15%: Safe Infusion Devices reduced the risk of gloves contamination by 84% in multivariate analysis (Odds ratio=0.16; 95% confidence interval=0.05-0.47; p<0.001). Topotecan was identified within 100% of the samples. Only one case of cross-contamination has occurred.

Despite the current practice of using neutral solvent-purged infusers, the occupational exposure remains high for nurses and Safe Infusion Devices significantly reduced this risk of exposure. However, glove contamination is only a surrogate endpoint. The results confirmed that the disconnection of empty bags resulted in occupational exposure. Except a contamination due to the leakage of a bag, no cross-contamination was detected. This validated the environmental quality of the cytotoxic drug circuit. Safe Infusion Devices were highly effective but did not completely eliminate exposure.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

120

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France, 42270
        • Institut de Cancérologie Lucien Neuwirth

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Nurses that have to manipulate drugs for chemotherapies and that meet risks of contamination were asked to paritipate at the study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Protocols which contained at least one of the 10 drugs of the dosing assay
  • Protocols with at least one disconnection step.
  • Given the large number of eligible protocols, we favored those with the most concentrated products (CPM, PMX) to maximize the chance of detecting contamination and also to extend inclusions over a longer period.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Drugs administrated with syringes (intravenously or subcutaneously) were not included because of the absence of impact of the SIDs on these modalities of administration.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Before arm
usual infusion practices (neutral solvent-purged infusers)
After arm
Safe Infusion Device
Safe infusion device is a different method than usual infusion practices (neutral solvent-purged infusers)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of contamination of nurses' gloves with cytotoxic products
Time Frame: day 1
The statistical unit consists of a sample taken from all the gloves used for the administration of a daily course. The dosing assay allowed to identify a panel of 10 cytotoxic drugs (HPLC MS/MS).
day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quantitative contamination of nurses' gloves with cytotoxic products
Time Frame: day 1
The dosing assay allowed to identify a panel of 10 cytotoxic drugs (HPLC MS/MS).
day 1
Costs
Time Frame: day 1
For each daily course performed in 2017 requiring the intravenous route, the necessary devices were estimated according to the two strategies
day 1
Manufacturing time
Time Frame: day 1
The manufacturing time was defined as the time elapsed between the time of passage in the cleanroom and the end of manufacturing of the first drug of the course.
day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 12, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

October 8, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 23, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 23, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

September 25, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 25, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 23, 2019

Last Verified

September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2017-PH1
  • IRBN522017/CHUSTE (Other Identifier: Comité d'Ethique du CHU de Saint-Etienne)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer

Clinical Trials on Safe Infusion Device

3
Subscribe