Labelled Carbon Sucrose Breath Test (13C-SBT) as a Marker of Environmental Enteropathy (SBT4EE)

October 5, 2021 updated by: Margaret Kosek, MD, University of Virginia

Validation and Field-applicability of a 13C-Sucrose Breath Test to Assess Carbohydrate Uptake and Utilization in Environmental Enteropathy Among Children in Resource Poor Settings: A Multi-site Prospective Study

Linear growth failure, a manifestation of chronic undernutrition in early childhood, is a recalcitrant problem in resource constrained settings. The underlying causes of growth failure are multifactorial, but persistent and recurrent infection and inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract and immune activation, a condition commonly referred to as environmental enteropathy, is an important contributor. A highly enriched 13C-Sucrose Breath Test, a measure of sucrase-isomaltase activity, will be evaluated as a non-invasive biomarker of environmental enteropathy, and more specifically of intestinal brush border enzyme activity in 6 resource poor countries (Bangladesh, India, Jamaica, Kenya, Peru and Zambia) in 100 volunteers aged 12-15 months (total n=600) and evaluated relative to the lactose rhamnose test and linear and ponderal growth over a 3-6 month period following biomarker assessment. Field usability will also be assessed.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Environmental enteropathy is associated with linear and ponderal growth shortfalls in young children in resource constrained settings. However, the physiological alterations of intestinal function that accompany both the demonstrable evidence of inflammation and architectural changes seen in biopsies from effected children have yet to be elucidated, and this knowledge gap limits the development of effective strategies to optimally manage the condition. Furthermore, a limited number of non-invasive assays exist with which to assess the presence of environmental enteropathy in low resource settings. This study aims 1) to determine if sucrose-isomaltase enzyme is altered in children with environmental enteropathy by using a 13C-Sucrose breath test 2) to determine if the test is able to be employed in resource limited settings.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

600

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Dhaka, Bangladesh
        • Recruiting
        • Nutrition and Clincial Services Division, icddr, b
        • Contact:
      • Bengaluru, India
        • Recruiting
        • CBCI Society for Medical Education, St John's Research Institute
        • Contact:
      • Kingston, Jamaica
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Tropical Metabolism Research Unit, University of West Indies
        • Contact:
      • Kakamega, Kenya
        • Recruiting
        • Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology
        • Contact:
      • Iquitos, Peru
        • Completed
        • Investigaciones Biomedicas, Asociacion Benefica PRISMA
      • East Kilbride, United Kingdom
      • Lusaka, Zambia
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Tropical Gastroenterology & Nutrition Ltd
        • Contact:
      • Ndola, Zambia
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Tropical Diseases Research Centre
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 year to 1 year (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Because of exigent test requirements enrollment will be restricted to convenience samples from populations near centers of excellence in nutritional studies in Dhaka, Bangladesh (the International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research); Bangalore, India (St. John's Research Institute, St. John's National Academy of Health Sciences); Kingston, Jamaica (The Tropical Metabolism Research Unit of the Caribbean Institute for Health Research, University of West Indies); Kakamega, Kenya (Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology); Iquitos, Peru44 (Asociación Benefica PRISMA and the University of Virginia); and Ndola, Zambia (Tropical Disease Research Centre). These sites represent a range of epidemiologic contexts which will enhance the cross-context applicability of study results.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

All children will be recruited and enrolled through convenience sampling, either at the community level (if the study site has previously censused the community) or through child clinic visits.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Severe acute malnutrition
  2. HIV positive
  3. Weight for height Z >+2
  4. Known medical illness contributing to growth failure

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of SBT to Lactulose rhamnose (LR) test-% dose 90 min
Time Frame: 6 months after enrollment is completed
The 13C-SBT (cumulative percent of dose recovered at 90 minutes post administration) will be compared to LR ratio (the ratio of the percent recovery of administered lactulose and mannitol)
6 months after enrollment is completed
Comparison of SBT to Lactulose rhamnose (LR) test- time to 50% recovery
Time Frame: 6 months after enrollment is completed
The 13C-SBT (time to 50% area under the curve of 13C tracer, expressed in minutes ) will be compared to LR ratio (the ratio of the percent recovery of administered lactulose and mannitol)
6 months after enrollment is completed
Correlation of SBT (% recovery at 90 minutes) to Lactulose rhamnose (LR) test-Lactulose recovery
Time Frame: 6 months after enrollment is completed
The 13C-SBT (cumulative percent of dose recovered at 90 minutes post administration) will be compared to the percent lactulose recovery at 90 minutes post administration
6 months after enrollment is completed
Correlation of SBT (time to 50% recovery) to Lactulose rhamnose (LR) test-Lactulose recovery
Time Frame: 6 months after enrollment is completed
The 13C-SBT (time to 50% area under the curve 13C tracer, expressed in minutes) will be compared to the percent lactulose recovery at 90 minutes post administration
6 months after enrollment is completed
Correlation of SBT (% dose recovered at 09 minutes) to Lactulose rhamnose (LR) test-Mannitol recovery
Time Frame: 6 months after enrollment is completed
The 13C-SBT (cumulative percent of dose of 13C recovered at 90 minutes post administration) will be compared to percent mannitol recovery
6 months after enrollment is completed
Correlation of SBT (time to recovery of 50% of dose) to Lactulose rhamnose (LR) test-Mannitol recovery
Time Frame: 6 months after enrollment is completed
The 13C-SBT (time to 50% area under the curve 13C tracer, expressed in minutes) will be compared to percent mannitol recovery
6 months after enrollment is completed
Characterize the relationship between SBT (% of dose recovered at 90 min) and baseline childhood anthropometrics (attained length)
Time Frame: 6 months after enrollment is completed
We will compare results of the SBT test expressed as cumulative percent of dose recovered at 90 minutes post administration and LAZ (length for age Z-score as defined by 2006 World Health Organization norms, cross-sectional)
6 months after enrollment is completed
Characterize the relationship between SBT (time to recovery of 50% of dose) and baseline childhood anthropometrics (attained length)
Time Frame: 6 months after enrollment is completed
We will compare results of the SBT test expressed as time to 50% area under the curve 13C tracer, expressed in minutes and LAZ (length for age Z-score as defined by 2006 World Health Organization norms, cross-sectional)
6 months after enrollment is completed
Characterize the relationship between SBT and childhood anthropometrics (attained weight)
Time Frame: 6 months after enrollment is completed
We will compare results of the SBT test expressed as the cumulative percent of dose recovered at 90 minutes post administration and WAZ (weight for age Z-score as defined by 2006 World Health Organization norms, cross-sectional)
6 months after enrollment is completed
Characterize the relationship between SBT and childhood anthropometrics (attained weight for height)
Time Frame: 6 months after enrollment is completed
We will compare results of the SBT test expressed as time to 50% area under the curve 13C tracer, expressed in minutes and WAZ (weight for age Z-score as defined by 2006 World Health Organization norms, cross-sectional)
6 months after enrollment is completed
Characterize the relationship between SBT (time to 50% recovery of 13C) and childhood linear growth, 3 months
Time Frame: 6 months after enrollment is completed
We will compare values for the 13C-SBT expressed as time to 50% area under the curve 13C tracer, expressed in minutes and change in length for age Z score (WHO 2006 reference standards) over the subsequent 3 months
6 months after enrollment is completed
Characterize the relationship between SBT and childhood linear growth, 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months after enrollment is completed
We will compare values for the 13C-SBT expressed as time to 50% area under the curve 13C tracer, expressed in minutes and change in length for age Z score (WHO 2006 reference standards) over the subsequent 6 months
6 months after enrollment is completed
Characterize the relationship between SBT (% dose recovered at 90 min)and childhood linear growth, 3 months
Time Frame: 6 months after enrollment is completed
We will compare the 13C-SBT tests results (cumulative percent of dose recovered at 90 minutes post administration) and change in LAZ over the subsequent 3 months
6 months after enrollment is completed
Characterize the relationship between SBT and childhood linear growth
Time Frame: 6 months after enrollment is completed
We will compare the 13C-SBT tests results (cumulative percent of dose recovered at 90 minutes post administration) and change in LAZ over the subsequent 6 months
6 months after enrollment is completed

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assess the relationship between the 13C-SBT (% recovery 90min) and fecal myeloperoxidase
Time Frame: Six months from the enrollment of the last subject
Compare fecal myeloperoxidase concentration (ng/mL) with 13SBT (% of cumulative dose recovered at 90 minutes, expressed as %)
Six months from the enrollment of the last subject
Assess the relationship between SBT ( time to recovery of 50% of the 13C-tracer) and fecal myeloperoxidase
Time Frame: Six months from the enrollment of the last subject
Compare fecal myeloperoxidase concentration (ng/mL) with 13SBT (time to recovery of 50% of the administered 13C tracer, measured in minutes)
Six months from the enrollment of the last subject
Assess the relationship between the 13C-SBT (% recovery 90 min) and serum fatty acid binding protein
Time Frame: Six months from the enrollment of the last subject
Compare serum fatty acid binding protein concentration (ng/mL), with 13SBT as assessed by % of administered dose recovered at 90 minutes
Six months from the enrollment of the last subject
Assess the relationship between the 13C-SBT (time to 50% recovery) and serum fatty acid binding protein concentration
Time Frame: Six months from the enrollment of the last subject
Compare serum fatty acid binding protein concentration (ng/mL) with 13SBT as measured by the time (in minutes) to the recovery of 50% of the administered dose of 13C.
Six months from the enrollment of the last subject
Assess the relationship between the 13C-SBT (time to 50% recovery) and kynurenine tryptophan ratio
Time Frame: Six months from the enrollment of the last subject
Compare time to recovery of 50% of 13C probe of SBT with kynurenine tryptophan ratio (molar ratio of KT multiplied by 1000)
Six months from the enrollment of the last subject
Assess the relationship between the 13C-SBT (% recovery at 90 minutes) and kynurenine tryptophan ratio,
Time Frame: Six months from the enrollment of the last subject
Compare 13C SBT as measured by % recovery of 13C probe at 90 minutes with kynurenine tryptophan ratio
Six months from the enrollment of the last subject
Assess the relationship between the 13C-SBT as assessed by percent of 13C tracer recovered in at 90 minutes and fecal alpha-antitrypsin concentration
Time Frame: Six months from the enrollment of the last subject
Compare 13CSBT as measured by the percent of tracer recovered at 90 minutes with fecal anti-trypsin concentration (mg/g)
Six months from the enrollment of the last subject
Assess the relationship between the 13C-SBT as measured by the time to 50% recovery of 13C and fecal alpha-antitrypsin
Time Frame: Six months from the enrollment of the last subject
Compare 13C SBT as measured by the time to 50% recovery of 13C with fecal anti-trypsin concentration (mg/g)
Six months from the enrollment of the last subject

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reproducibility of the 13C-SBT test , percent of dose recovered in first 90 minutes
Time Frame: Six months from the enrollment of the last subject
We will assess the coefficient of variation and correlation coefficient between repeated cumulative percent of dose recovered at 90 minutes post administration on separate SBT tests administered one week apart done on the same child (Peru site only).
Six months from the enrollment of the last subject
Reproducibility of the 13C-SBT test, time to 50% area under the curve of 13C tracer, expressed in minutes
Time Frame: Six months from the enrollment of the last subject
We will assess the coefficient of variation and correlation coefficient between repeated SBT tests 7 days apart as assessed by the time to 50% area under the curve of 13C tracer, expressed in minutes from the same child (Peru site only).
Six months from the enrollment of the last subject
Epidemiologic factors that influence 13C-SBT measure, percent of dose recovered at 90 minutes
Time Frame: Six months from the enrollment of the last subject
Determine if significant associations exist between 13C-SBT measured as cumulative percent of dose recovered at 90 minutes post administration and the WAMI index.The WAMI index is a previously validated composite index of environmental variables to create a index that expresses the socioeconomic and physical environment in diverse geographical contexts (PMID 24656134)
Six months from the enrollment of the last subject
Epidemiologic factors that influence 13C-SBT measure, time to 50% AUC recovered
Time Frame: Six months from the enrollment of the last subject
Determine if significant associations exist between 13C-SBT measured as the time to recovery of 50% of the administered tracer and the WAMI index. The WAMI index is a previously validated composite index of environmental variables to create a index that expresses the socioeconomic and physical environment in diverse geographical contexts ((PMID 24656134).
Six months from the enrollment of the last subject

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 20, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 26, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

September 30, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 6, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 5, 2021

Last Verified

October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Intestinal Permeability

3
Subscribe