Digital Catheter Based Pancreatoscopy (SpyGlassDS) for the Management of Symptomatic Pancreatic Duct Stones in Selected Patients With Chronic Pancreatitis

October 25, 2019 updated by: Evangelisches Krankenhaus Düsseldorf
Investigation of the efficacy and safety of digital catheter-based pancreatoscopy (DCP) for the Treatment of symptomatic Stones of the pancreatic duct in selected patients with chronic calcifying pancreatitis (CCP)

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background Endoscopic treatment of patients with chronic calcifying pancreatitis (CCP) is still challenging and controversially discussed. The goal is symptom control and relief of pain, which can be achieved by draining an obstructed main pancreatic duct (MPD) and/or removal of ductal stones. The 2012 European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE)- Guidelines recommends ESWL as a first step for patients with uncomplicated painful chronic pancreatitis and radiopaque stones ≥5mm obstructing the MPD. However, limitations of ESWL (extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy ) include its limited availability, a likely need for multiple sessions and often repeated ERCP (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography) sessions for removal of stone fragments or treatment of associated strictures.

Pancreatoscopically guided management of pancreatic stones offers a potential alternative to ESWL. However, the numbers of studies and enrolled patients are still low. In 2015 single operator video cholangioscopy (SpyGlassDS, Boston Scientific) was introduced. Available data on its use for pancreatoscopy is limited. The technique provides digital imaging with a higher resolution and improved maneuverability compared to the legacy fiberoptic system. In addition, the working channel was enlarged to a diameter of 1.3 mm. Although SOVP have shown promise in CCP, studies to date generally have been limited by: retrospective design, relatively small and mixed patient populations, short follow-up periods, different clinical and technical endpoints, and, often, a single-center design. Therefore, the investigators designed a prospective multicenter cohort study to evaluate long-term clinical efficacy, technical success and safety of SOVP.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

43

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Eligible patients are adults (≥ 18 years of age) with a signed informed consent with:
  • symptomatic chronic pancreatitis (recurrent pain attacks, history of pain for at least 3 months), and
  • ≤3 radiopaque stones ≥5mm obstructing the MPD in the pancreatic head and/or corpus.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • - Health status ASA 4
  • Pregnancy
  • Coagulopathy (INR≥2.0, Platelets < 70/nl)
  • Taking anti-platelet agents or anticoagulants (other than aspirin) within last 7 days
  • Any medical contraindication to ERCP, deep sedation or general anesthesia
  • History of chronic symptomatic pancreatitis of more than 3-4 years[9]
  • History of daily use of opioids except Tramadol for more than 6 months in the last 2 years
  • Episode of biliary obstruction in the previous 2 months (defined as jaundice or bilirubin levels >=2,5mg/dl or CBD stent
  • Auto-Immune Pancreatitis or IgG4 associated pancreatitis
  • Altered GI anatomy, previous failures of endoscopic approach to the papilla
  • Abdominal pain not attributable to CP
  • Any suspicion of pancreatic cancer
  • Current symptomatic WON
  • More than one ductal stricture in the pancreatic head or body
  • Previous ESWL pancreatic stones
  • Age <18

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: SpyGlass Pancreatoscopy
ERP with direct pancreatoscopy
The technique provides digital imaging with a higher resolution and improved maneuverability compared to the legacy fiberoptic system. In addition, the working channel was enlarged to a diameter of 1.3 mm. Retrospective data showed an overall technical success rate for single-operator video pancreatoscopy (SOVP) guided treatment of pancreatic stones of 95%

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants with complete clearance of the MPD from ≤3 stones in the pancreatic head and/or body by means of SOVP in ≤3 treatment sessions
Time Frame: at baseline visit
Number of patients where complete clearance of the MPD could be reached within three Treatment sessions of SOVP
at baseline visit

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of treatment sessions
Time Frame: within three months
Number of Treatment sessions which are necessary to reach complete clearanceof the MPD
within three months
Procedural time
Time Frame: at baseline visit
Time for the procedure from beginning to the end of the intervention
at baseline visit
Number of participants with Adverse events (post procedure and at 30 days)
Time Frame: at baseline visit and 30 days after the invention
Incidence of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events as reported by the patients or as detected during the visits or by unplanned hospitalization
at baseline visit and 30 days after the invention
Rate of pancreatoscopic visualization of the targeted stones(s) and initiation of lithotripsy by using the Single-Operator Video pancreatoscopy (SOVP)
Time Frame: at baseline visit
Determined by number of patients where the targeted Stones can be made visuable during the intervention
at baseline visit
Number of patients with stone fragmentation (particles ≤3mm, or decreased stone density at X-ray, an increased stone surface and heterogenity of the stone(s) which may fill the MPD and adjacent side branches
Time Frame: at baseline visit
Number of patients where the Stones can be fragmented during the intervention
at baseline visit
Number of patients with ductal drainage after complete or incomplete ductal clearance (e.g. by placement of an endoprosthesis)
Time Frame: at baseline visit
at baseline visit
Determination by MRCP of the diameter of the MPD prior to treatment and at 6 months after the final intervention
Time Frame: prior procedure and 6 months after procedure
prior procedure and 6 months after procedure
Rate of patients with improved Clinical Outcome or complications as assessed by Numeric Rating scale (NRS) for pain, Izbicki Pain Score and number of pain attacks determined at 30 days, 6 and 12 months after the final intervention by means of SOVP
Time Frame: 30 days, 6 months and 12 months after procedure
Self-reported pain Status as assessed by the pain assessments NRS for pain and Izbicki pain Score as well as self-reported pain attacks
30 days, 6 months and 12 months after procedure
Change of Quality of life as assessed by the Short Form -12 questionnaire prior to treatment and 6 months after the final intervention
Time Frame: prior treatrment, 6 months after treatment and at the last procedure visit (procedure I, II or III as applicable)
Self-reported Quality of life as assessed by the Short Form -12 questionnaire (this questionnaire is evaluated centrally by the rights-holding company), answering 12 questions regarding Quality of Life
prior treatrment, 6 months after treatment and at the last procedure visit (procedure I, II or III as applicable)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

May 31, 2019

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2022

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 8, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 14, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

October 18, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

October 29, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 25, 2019

Last Verified

October 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SPYGlass DS

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pancreatitis, Chronic

Clinical Trials on single operator video cholangioscopy

3
Subscribe