- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04171973
Evaluation of Electric Wheelchair Driving Performance in Simulator Compared to Driving in Real-life Situations (SIMADAPT1)
Evaluation of Electric Wheelchair Driving Performance in Simulator Compared to Driving in a Real-life Situation, in a Population of Regular Drivers With Neurological Disorders
The device that is the subject of this investigation is a solution for driving simulation of an electric wheelchair. It is intended to enable patients who are likely to acquire an electric wheelchair to train in a virtual environment, favorable to the safety of training, to its repetition, and to produce more varied, rich training environments and more tailored to specific and individualized needs. These solutions will make it easier to access real-world driving for patients who are currently experiencing learning difficulties.
It is expected that this investigation demonstrates the reproducibility of driving performance in electric wheelchair driving simulator compared to the real world.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
As part of this investigation, it is expected to develop a driving simulator that could contribute to improving the learning of electric wheelchair driving and access to electric wheelchair for people who can not currently claim for physical risks and weak psychology for the participant in the research.
The present clinical investigation aims at evaluating the performances, the safety and the satisfaction of the users with regard to a simulator of driving of electric wheelchair in virtual reality.
The main objective is to evaluate the feasibility of a virtual electric wheelchair driving training, comparing driving performance in virtual reality versus reality, in identical real and virtual standardized circuits, in regular users of electric wheelchairs with neurological disorders.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Bretagne
-
Rennes, Bretagne, France, 35000
- Pôle Saint-Hélier
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male or female, over 18 years old,
- Having freely consented to participate in the study,
- With neurological degenerative disorders including cerebrovascular accident and head trauma or neurodegeneration including Parkinson's disease and related syndromes, multiple sclerosis, myopathy and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis,
- Having benefited from an electric wheelchair prescription and traveling in electric wheelchair for more than 3 months,
- Whose electric wheelchair is the main mode of travel,
- The physical measurements (weight, size) are compatible with the use of the physical simulator chosen for the development of the robotic assistance module, according to manufacturer's data 140 kg max and 51 cm max of seat width .
Exclusion Criteria:
- Understanding difficulties preventing the realization of the protocol,
- Motor disorders of the upper limb requiring additional driving technical assistance,
Patient having expressed difficulties impacting his safety of sedan and / or external, objectified by a negative answer to more than one item on the self-questionnaire WST QF for the items pertaining to driving (6 to 12 and 17 to 28):
- inability to perform certain driving tasks (answer "no")
- or insecure to achieve them (answer "not at all").
- pregnant, parturient or nursing mother,
- Person deprived of liberty by a judicial or administrative decision, persons under psychiatric care or admitted to a health or social institution for purposes other than research,
- Minor,
- Major under legal protection or unable to express his consent,
- Person in emergency situation who can not express their prior consent.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: OTHER
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
- Masking: NONE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
OTHER: Driving an electric wheelchair in real condition
In order to be able to evaluate the feasibility of virtual reality driving training, the driving performance will be evaluated on the same 3 standardized circuits: for the control group, 3 circuits of test of pipes in real condition of increasing difficulty are tested.
Patients perform 2 passes in this condition.
|
For the control group, 3 test circuits of pipes in real condition of increasing difficulty are tested.
Patients perform 2 passes in this condition.
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Driving an electric wheelchair in virtual condition
In order to be able to evaluate the feasibility of driving training in virtual reality, the driving performance will be evaluated on the same 3 standardized circuits: for the virtual reality group, the circuits have been digitized.
Patients perform 2 passes in this condition.
|
For the virtual reality group, the circuits have been digitized.
Patients perform 2 passes in this condition.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Number of collision
Time Frame: Day 1
|
The primary judgment criterion is the number of collisions on different standardized circuits in real condition versus virtual condition
|
Day 1
|
Number of collision
Time Frame: Day 8
|
The primary judgment criterion is the number of collisions on different standardized circuits in real condition versus virtual condition
|
Day 8
|
Number of collision
Time Frame: Day 15
|
The primary judgment criterion is the number of collisions on different standardized circuits in real condition versus virtual condition
|
Day 15
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Driving Speed
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15
|
Speed measured by the completion time of the course on the different circuits in real condition versus virtual condition
|
Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15
|
Wheelchair Skill Test (WST)
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15
|
Driving performance measured by the Wheelchair Skill Test items corresponding to the different courses in real condition versus virtual condition
|
Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15
|
NASA-Task Load Index
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15
|
The cognitive load of tests under both conditions will be measured by the NASA-Task Load Index.
It is in the form of six scales where the participant must assign a score between zero and one hundred to each of them, score indicating a growing level of intensity.
Three dimensions relate to the demands imposed on the subject (mental, physical and temporal demands) and three to the interaction of a subject with the task (effort, frustration and performance)
|
Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15
|
Ease of Use Questionnaire
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15
|
The satisfaction of the use of the electric wheelchair under the conditions will be evaluated by the self-questionnaire Ease of Use Questionnaire.
It measures the subjective usability of a product or service.
It is a 30-item survey that examines four dimensions of usability: usefulness, ease of use, ease of learning, and satisfaction.
The questionnaires were constructed as seven-point Likert rating scales.
Users were asked to rate agreement with the statements, ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (7).
|
Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15
|
Unified theory of acceptance of technology questionnaire (UTAUT)
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15
|
Questionnaire of acceptability / acceptance of the tool and its use by patients based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use Technology (UTAUT).
|
Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15
|
Igroup Presence Questionnaire (IPQ)
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15
|
The IPQ comprises 14 items rated on a seven-point Likert Scale ranging from -3 to 3. The general item assesses the general "sense of being there", and has high loadings on all three factors, with an especially strong loading on Spatial Presence.
The Spatial Presence sub-scale is related to the sense of being physically inside the virtual environment.
The involvement sub-scale is directed to evaluate the attention devoted to the virtual environment.
The realness sub-scale evaluates the sense of reality attributed to the virtual environment.
|
Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15
|
The learning effect
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15
|
The learning effect on the virtual circuit and on the real circuit, will be evaluated by progression / stabilization of the time of realization during the sequence of repetitions.
|
Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15
|
Graybiel score
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15
|
Assessment of discomfort and motion sickness to quantify the intensity of different symptoms during motion sickness.
|
Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2019-A01903-54
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Neurologic Disorder
-
Chung-Ang University Gwangmyeong HospitalNot yet recruitingNeurologic Disorder
-
Medical University of ViennaNeurologisches Rehabiliationszentrum RosenhügelRecruitingNeurologic DisorderAustria
-
Rehabilitation Hospital of Overland ParkDiscovery StatisticsRecruitingNeurologic DisorderUnited States
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesIndiana University; Norton Healthcare; Child Neurology FoundationRecruitingNeurologic DisorderUnited States
-
University Hospital, ToulouseIpsenCompleted
-
Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Institute...Completed
-
Henri Mondor University HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
QuantalX NeuroscienceCompleted
-
Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche...Université Paris Cité; National Agency for Sanitary Safety of the Food of the...Not yet recruitingNeurologic Disorder | Neurologic Symptoms
-
Centre integre universitaire de sante et de services...Not yet recruitingAging | Disorder, Neurologic
Clinical Trials on Driving an electric wheelchair in real condition
-
Pôle Saint HélierCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne; Centre Communal d'Action...Terminated
-
University of HaifaCompletedAging | Executive Function | Social Behavior | Cognitive Function 1, Social | Aging WellIsrael
-
University Hospital, Clermont-FerrandUniversité d'Auvergne; Tza Nou - Maison médicale pour enfants et adolescentes... and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
Hospital St. Joseph, Marseille, FranceCompletedSoftware Performance Evaluation a PosterioriFrance
-
Pennington Biomedical Research CenterCompletedEnergy ExpenditureUnited States
-
Prof. Massimo FilippiRecruitingParkinson DiseaseItaly
-
Nantes University HospitalUnknown
-
PfizerCompleted