The Utility of Virtual Reality in the Management of Pediatric Functional Constipation With Pelvic Floor Dysfunction.

July 7, 2022 updated by: Ann Ming Yeh, Stanford University
  1. To determine if the adjunctive use of a Virtual Reality (VR) module on diaphragmatic breathing (DB) can improve the quality of life (QOL) and symptoms of children with functional constipation (FC) with pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) who are receiving standard of care treatment.
  2. To assess if a VR module on DB can decrease healthcare utilization for children with FC with PFD.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The investigators will assess if the use a Virtual Reality (VR) module on diaphragmatic breathing (DB) can improve quality of life, constipation symptoms, and decrease healthcare utilization for children with functional constipation (FC) with pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD). FC is a common pediatric condition with a high prevalence and $4.25 billion yearly in healthcare expenditures. FC is often complicated with PFD as seen through stool withholding behaviors. Children with FC with PFD are referred to occupational therapy for biofeedback and DB training as standard of care. Occupational therapy uses to teach children with FC with PFD to relax their abdominal muscles, and subsequently their pelvic floor muscles, facilitating a more complete bowel evacuation. VR is a technology currently employed in rehabilitation services, anesthesiology and surgery. VR can provide a fun, immersive environment with a feedback component for children with FC to learn DB effectively and build a positive association with toileting.

The purpose of this study is to examine if a virtual reality module that teaches children diaphragmatic breathing through an immersive game can improve the quality of life and decrease health care utilization for children with functional constipation and pelvic floor dysfunction.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

9

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Palo Alto, California, United States, 94304
        • Stanford Hospital/Lucile Packard Children's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

5 years to 19 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ages 7 to 21 years old
  • Meets Rome IV criteria for functional constipation and pelvic floor dysfunction
  • Developmentally appropriate to understand verbal instructions

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Co-existing medical conditions that include inflammatory bowel disease, Hirschsprung's Disease, cystic fibrosis, tethered cord, anal stenosis, sacral agenesis, spinal cord anomalies, untreated thyroid disease, untreated celiac disease, neurogenic bowel, cerebral palsy, major bowel surgery.
  • Non-English speaking

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Virtual reality arm
This arm will receive diaphragmatic breathing teaching by a medical professional and virtual reality module that teaches diaphragmatic breathing. This arm will be sent home with the virtual reality equipment and practice this breathing technique through the virtual reality module for 8 weeks.
10 minute virtual reality tutorial on diaphragmatic breathing, a game in practicing diaphragmatic breathing, and two scenarios in which the patient can also practice diaphragmatic breathing.
10 minute tutorial on diaphragmatic breathing by a medical professional.
Placebo Comparator: Control
This arm will receive diaphragmatic breathing teaching by a medical professional only. They will practice this breathing technique with a paper handout of diaphragmatic breathing technique instructions for 8 weeks.
10 minute tutorial on diaphragmatic breathing by a medical professional.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in baseline in Rome criteria for functional constipation and symptoms of pelvic floor dysfunction.
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 visit between week 2
This outcome will assess cure of functional constipation and pelvic floor dysfunction.
Baseline, 1 visit between week 2
Change in baseline in Rome criteria for functional constipation and symptoms of pelvic floor dysfunction.
Time Frame: Baseline, week 4
This outcome will assess cure of functional constipation and pelvic floor dysfunction.
Baseline, week 4
Change in baseline in Rome criteria for functional constipation and symptoms of pelvic floor dysfunction.
Time Frame: Baseline, week 8
This outcome will assess cure of functional constipation and pelvic floor dysfunction.
Baseline, week 8

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in Pediatric Quality of Life (QOL) gastrointestinal (GI) module
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 visit between week 2
Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™ Gastrointestinal Symptoms Scales (PedsQL™ Gastrointestinal Symptoms Scales). Scale: 0-4. The total scale score is tallied from the sum of the reversed scores; the higher the score, the higher the health-related quality of life.
Baseline, 1 visit between week 2
Change from baseline in Pediatric Quality of Life (QOL) gastrointestinal (GI) module
Time Frame: Baseline, week 4
Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™ Gastrointestinal Symptoms Scales (PedsQL™ Gastrointestinal Symptoms Scales). Scale: 0-4. The total scale score is tallied from the sum of the reversed scores; the higher the score, the higher the health-related quality of life.
Baseline, week 4
Change from baseline in Pediatric Quality of Life (QOL) gastrointestinal (GI) module
Time Frame: Baseline, week 8
Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™ Gastrointestinal Symptoms Scales (PedsQL™ Gastrointestinal Symptoms Scales). Scale: 0-4. The total scale score is tallied from the sum of the reversed scores; the higher the score, the higher the health-related quality of life.
Baseline, week 8
Change from baseline in Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms (PAC-SYM) constipation questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 visit between week 2
Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms (PAC-SYM). The PAC-SYM (12-items) is a survey used to evaluate chronic constipation. Patients rank the symptoms on a 5 point Likert scale, ranging from 0 to 4, 0 being absent and 4 being very severe. For each symptom, score changes of 0.5 points indicate minimal improvement, and changes in 1 point correspond to moderate clinical improvement.
Baseline, 1 visit between week 2
Change from baseline in Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms (PAC-SYM) constipation questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, week 4
Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms (PAC-SYM). The PAC-SYM (12-items) is a survey used to evaluate chronic constipation. Patients rank the symptoms on a 5 point Likert scale, ranging from 0 to 4, 0 being absent and 4 being very severe. For each symptom, score changes of 0.5 points indicate minimal improvement, and changes in 1 point correspond to moderate clinical improvement.
Baseline, week 4
Change from baseline in Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms (PAC-SYM) constipation questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, week 8
Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms (PAC-SYM). The PAC-SYM (12-items) is a survey used to evaluate chronic constipation. Patients rank the symptoms on a 5 point Likert scale, ranging from 0 to 4, 0 being absent and 4 being very severe. For each symptom, score changes of 0.5 points indicate minimal improvement, and changes in 1 point correspond to moderate clinical improvement.
Baseline, week 8

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ann Ming Yeh, MD, Stanford Hospital/Lucile Packard Children's Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Alice C Huang, MD, Stanford Hospital/Lucile Packard Children's Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 13, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 19, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

November 21, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 8, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 7, 2022

Last Verified

July 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 52684

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pelvic Floor Disorders

Clinical Trials on Oculus go headset/virtual reality headset

3
Subscribe