Elbow Outcomes Clinical Study (WELBOW) (WELBOW)

April 9, 2024 updated by: Stryker Trauma GmbH
WELBOW study is an international, ambispective and prospective, single arm, multicenter, observational, non-comparative, Post-Market Clinical Follow-up (PMCF).

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

WELBOW study is an international, ambispective and prospective, single arm, multicenter, observational, non-comparative, Post-Market Clinical Follow-up (PMCF). Outcome data collected from this study will provide the basis for Post-Market Surveillance (PMS) reporting, Clinical Study Report (CSR) and Clinical Evaluation Report (CER) on Elbow system devices and support peer-reviewed publications on long-term product performance and safety.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

800

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Herentals, Belgium
        • Recruiting
        • AZ Herentals
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Frederic DE SCHRIJVER, Dr
      • London, Canada
        • Recruiting
        • Lawson Health Research Institute
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Graham KING, Pr
      • Bordeaux, France, 33000
        • Recruiting
        • CHU Bordeaux
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Alexandra ERBLAND, Dr
      • Lyon, France
        • Recruiting
        • Clinique du Parc
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Christophe RIZZO, Dr
      • Rouen, France, 76031
        • Recruiting
        • Rouen University Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Fabrice DUPARC, Pr
      • Tours, France
        • Recruiting
        • Chu Tours
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Guillaume BACLE, Dr
      • Linköping, Sweden, 581 83
        • Withdrawn
        • Linköping University
      • Varberg, Sweden, 432 37
        • Withdrawn
        • Sjukhuset i Varberg Hospital
    • Lancashire
      • Wigan, Lancashire, United Kingdom, WN6 9EP
        • Recruiting
        • Wrightington Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Adam WATTS, Pr

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients from Europe (United Kingdom, France, Germany, Sweden, Belgium)

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years or older at the time of the informed consent or the non-opposition (when applicable).
  • Informed and willing to sign an informed consent form approved by IRB or EC (when applicable).
  • Willing and able to comply with the requirements of the study protocol.
  • For prospective inclusion: Considered for treatment with one Wright Medical Elbow arthroplasty or fracture devices included in this study (primary or revision).
  • For ambispective inclusion

    1. Must have undergone an Elbow arthroplasty or fracture with one Wright Medical Elbow studied device between the date of the first Site Initiation Visit (SIV) and until 4.5 years prior this one in order to have at least the 5 years follow-up visit prospectively. Ambispective patients who were explanted prior the date of the first SIV will be included.
    2. Must have complete Information available for each completed visit (demographics, preoperative information, surgery information, device details)*.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not able to comply with the study procedures based on the judgment of the assessor (e.g. cannot comprehend study questions, inability to keep scheduled assessment times).
  • Patient belongs to a vulnerable group of patients, including minor patients, those unable to decide for themselves to participate or needing a Legally Authorized Representative (LAR), or others who could be subject to coercion (patients who may not be acting on their own initiative) (referred as "vulnerable subject" in the section 3.44 of the ISO 14155:2011 norm).
  • Patient with previous elbow device(s) which remain(s) implanted.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Assessment: QuickDASH questionnaire
Time Frame: At 24 months
Demonstrate a superior (lower) Total QuickDASH score average at 24 months postoperative compared to the upper threshold of 49 points The QuickDASH is an abbreviated 11-question subset from the original Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. The questionnaire's answers are scored on a 1-5 points scale that is then transformed to result in a score that ranges from 0 (indicating least disability) to 100 (indicating most disability).
At 24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Implant Survivorship
Time Frame: At 2, 5, 7 and 10 years.
Rates of revision surgeries; assessed using the Kaplan-Meyer analysis. Censorship will be at the point of the last patient event (visit, death, revision).
At 2, 5, 7 and 10 years.
Clinical Assessment: QuickDASH questionnaire
Time Frame: From Baseline to 10 years except 7 years.
The QuickDASH is an abbreviated 11-question subset from the original Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. The questionnaire's answers are scored on a 1-5 points scale that is then transformed to result in a score that ranges from 0 (indicating least disability) to 100 (indicating most disability).
From Baseline to 10 years except 7 years.
Clinical Assessment: Range of Motion
Time Frame: From Baseline to 10 years except 7 years.
Range of Motion (ROM) is a movement test conducted on a joint to diagnose level of pain and function. Flexion / Extension, Supination and Pronation will be evaluated.
From Baseline to 10 years except 7 years.
Clinical Assessment: Strength
Time Frame: From Baseline to 10 years except 7 years.
Elbow strength will be measured with the MRC Strenght Scale The MRC Strength Scale is a 5-items scale. The muscle scale grades muscle power on a scale of 0 to 5 in relation to the maximum expected for that muscle. Grade 5 shows normal contraction of the muscle, Grade 0 shows no movement.
From Baseline to 10 years except 7 years.
Clinical Assessment: Patient's Satisfaction
Time Frame: From Baseline to 10 years except 7 years.
  • Single subjective question: "How satisfied are you with your elbow?" Response options include: "Very Satisfied, Satisfied, Dissatisfied, and Very Dissatisfied".
  • Subjective value: "How would you rate your elbow today as a percentage of normal? (0 to 100% scale with 100% being normal)".
From Baseline to 10 years except 7 years.
Safety and Tolerability : Number of device associated and procedure associated adverse events.
Time Frame: Up to 10 years.
Number of device associated and procedure associated adverse events.
Up to 10 years.
Clinical Assessment: MEPS questionnaire
Time Frame: From Baseline to 10 years except 7 years.
Clinician based index with 4 subscales and 8 items (pain, range of motion, stability, daily function), measured with a goniometer. MEPS ranges from 5 to 100 points which higher scores indicates better function. A total score between 90 and 100 points considered excellent; between 75 and 89 points, good; between 60 and 74 points; fair, less than 60 points, poor
From Baseline to 10 years except 7 years.
Radiologic Assessment for bone characteristics
Time Frame: Before surgery, at 3 months for Osteosynthesis and 1, 2, 5 and 10 years for Arthroplasties.
Imaging (X-ray, CT scan or MRI) will be analyzed, when sufficient information is available, for bone characteristics
Before surgery, at 3 months for Osteosynthesis and 1, 2, 5 and 10 years for Arthroplasties.
Radiologic Assessment for device migration
Time Frame: Before surgery, at 3 months for Osteosynthesis and 1, 2, 5 and 10 years for Arthroplasties.
Imaging (X-ray, CT scan or MRI) will be analyzed, when sufficient information is available, for device migration
Before surgery, at 3 months for Osteosynthesis and 1, 2, 5 and 10 years for Arthroplasties.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Rebecca Gibson, Stryker Trauma

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 8, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2034

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 20, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

November 21, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 11, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 9, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1801-T-WELBOW-RM
  • 2019-A00492-55 (Other Identifier: French National Health Agency)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Orthopedic Disorder

3
Subscribe