Short Term Topical Tetracaine is Safe and Highly Efficacious for the Treatment of Pain Caused by Corneal Abrasions

December 4, 2019 updated by: INTEGRIS Southwest Medical Center

Short Term Topical Tetracaine is Safe and Highly Efficacious for the Treatment of Pain Caused by Corneal Abrasions: a Double-blind Randomized Clinical Trial

The objective of this study was to show that patients with corneal abrasions would experience more pain relief with short term topical tetracaine than placebo, have similar complication rates, and take less hydrocodone for breakthrough pain.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Corneal abrasions are among the most common eye-related injuries seen in the emergency department (ED). Topical anesthetic drops are routinely used prior to slit-lamp examination for diagnosis of corneal abrasions and often provide immediate pain relief. Patients are then sent home with oral analgesics and topical antibiotics. The use of topical anesthetics for outpatient treatment of corneal abrasions is discouraged by most emergency medicine textbooks due to concerns over safety. Case reports of abuse and misuse as well as animal studies have suggested that long term use of topical anesthetics may lead to rare complications. Two clinical trials showed no delayed healing after a short course of topical anesthetics following PRK surgery. Whether this could be applied to nonsurgical patients in the ED was investigated by two small clinical trials that showed similar efficacy and safety but were underpowered to prove a statistical difference. In 2014, a larger randomized trial demonstrated the safety of tetracaine for ED patients with corneal abrasions but failed to show a significant difference in patient visual analogue scale (VAS) pain ratings over time. More recently, a retrospective cohort study of 444 ED patients given tetracaine for 24 hours reported no serious complications or uncommon adverse events. If topical anesthetics could be safely prescribed for short term use in the management of corneal abrasions, it is possible that this would decrease use of systemic opioids for this purpose. The aim of this randomized, double-blind trial was to compare the effectiveness of topical tetracaine versus placebo in ED patients with corneal abrasions as measured by a reduction in the VAS score.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

118

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients aged 18 years to 80 years old presenting to the ED with suspected acute corneal abrasion from mechanical trauma or removal of a foreign body by the physician were included

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients were excluded if they wore contact lenses, had previous corneal surgery or transplant in the affected eye, presented more than 36 hours after their injury, had a grossly contaminated foreign body or coexisting ocular infection. Additional exclusion criteria were pregnancy, retained foreign body, penetrating eye injury, immunosuppression, allergy to study medication, inability to attend follow up, inability to fluently read and speak English or Spanish, or any injury requiring urgent ophthalmologic evaluation (large or complicated abrasions with significant vision loss, corneal ulcers, corneal lacerations).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Topical tetracaine
Topical tetracaine hydrochoride 1%
topical ophthalmologic anesthestic
Placebo Comparator: Balanced artificial tear solution
Balanced artificial tear solution (Systane)
Placebo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Visual Analog Scale score
Time Frame: 48 hours
The primary endpoint of the study was the overall post study drop Visual Analog Scale pain score measured at the patients initial follow up Emergency Department visit. Measured on a 0-10 scale with 0 meaning no pain and 10 worst pain.
48 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analog Scale score
Time Frame: 1 week
Secondary endpoint were the average self-reported post study drop Visual Analog Scale score after each use.Measured on a 0-10 scale with 0 meaning no pain and 10 worst pain.
1 week
Number of hydrocodone tablets taken
Time Frame: 48 hours
48 hours
adverse events
Time Frame: 1 week
any adverse events
1 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 27, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

December 5, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 6, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2019

Last Verified

December 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Corneal Abrasion

Clinical Trials on Placebo

3
Subscribe