Reference Values for Compound Muscle Action Potential Amplitude Obtained by Direct Muscle Stimulation

January 10, 2020 updated by: Halit Fidancı, Adana City Training and Research Hospital

Reference Values for the Ratio of Compound Muscle Action Potential Amplitude Obtained by Nerve Stimulation to That Obtained by Direct Muscle Stimulation

Direct muscle stimulation (DMS) method is one of the electrodiagnostic methods used in the diagnosis of critical illness myopathy (CIM) and critical illness neuropathy (CIN). The ratio of amplitude of compound muscle action potential (CMAP) obtained by nerve stimulation (nCMAP) to amplitude of CMAP obtained by DMS (dmCMAP) can be used to differentiate these two diseases. Although not certain, if the ratio is < 0.5, the diagnosis is thought to be consistent with CIN. The ratio > 0.5 is considered to be a finding supporting CIM. The investigators aimed to find the reference values of the ratio from healthy individuals. A monopolar needle electrode was used for DMS. The dmCMAP and nCMAP were recorded with a concentric needle. The ratio was calculated by using amplitudes of dmCMAP and nCMAP obtained from deltoid and tibialis anterior muscles.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Age, gender, height, weight, body mass index and neurological examination findings of the participants were recorded. Healthy participants were not included if they had; polyneuropathy or a disease such as diabetes mellitus that causes polyneuropathy, complaints such as weakness or paresthesia, a neurodegenerative disease, abnormal neurological examination, myopathy or hereditary polyneuropathy in family history. In addition, healthy participants were excluded if the conventional nerve conduction study and needle electromyography (EMG) findings were abnormal. Median, ulnar, posterior tibial, peroneal, superficial peroneal, sural nerve conduction studies were performed to all participants. Needle EMG and direct muscle stimulation were applied to the deltoid and tibialis anterior muscles of the healthy participants.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

29

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Adana, Turkey, 01230
        • Adana City Training and Research Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years to 80 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy individuals

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Polyneuropathy
  • a disease such as diabetes mellitus that causes polyneuropathy
  • complaints such as weakness or paresthesia
  • a neurodegenerative disease
  • abnormal neurological examination

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Healthy individuals
Direct muscle stimulation was performed to deltoid and tibialis anterior muscles with a monopolar needle electrode. Recording was made with a concentric needle electrode.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the Ratio of Compound Muscle Action Potential Amplitude Obtained by Nerve Stimulation to That Obtained by Direct Muscle Stimulation
Time Frame: 1 hour
The normal limits of the ratio were the primary outcome criteria. This ratio is high in critical illness myopathy or healthy individuals, while low in ciritical illness neuropathy of broken disease occurs. Considering the study of Lefaucheur et al., at least 23 healthy individuals should be included in the study.(Lefaucheur JP, Nordine T, Rodriguez P, Brochard L (2006) Origin of ICU acquired paresis determined by direct muscle stimulation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 77:500-6)
1 hour

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 30, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 2, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 9, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 10, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

January 13, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 13, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 10, 2020

Last Verified

January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Critical Illness Polyneuromyopathy

Clinical Trials on needle electromyography

3
Subscribe