Effects of Pharmacological Stress and rTMS on Executive Function in Opioid Use Disorder

March 7, 2024 updated by: Mark Greenwald, PhD, Wayne State University

Effects of Pharmacological Stress and Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Interventions on Executive Function in Opioid Use Disorder

This preliminary study is designed to evaluate mechanisms by which excitatory dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) (vs. sham) and pharmacological stress (vs. placebo) alter behavior in non-treatment seeking individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD). Specific Aims are to (1) Evaluate how stress impacts domains of behavior including (1a) executive function and (1b) opioid-seeking behavior; and (2) Determine whether rTMS stimulation attenuates (2a) executive dysfunction, (2b) stress-reactivity, and (2c) opioid-seeking in individuals with OUD not receiving treatment.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study will use a double-blind, 10Hz left dlPFC rTMS (vs. sham) and pharmacological stressor ([yohimbine + hydrocortisone] vs. placebo) within-subject, randomized crossover design. Each participant will complete 4 sessions (stressor vs. placebo, crossed with rTMS vs. sham), each separated by at least 1 week. Participants will complete these 4 (2x2 within subject) test conditions in randomized order: sham rTMS/placebo stress, sham rTMS/active stress, active rTMS/ placebo stress, and active rTMS/active stress.

The PI will perform randomization using a Latin Square and will assign participants to conditions and prepare medication (stressor or placebo) for each participant's sessions. The PI will keep others blinded and will not be involved in study assessments.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48201
        • Tolan Park Medical Building

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Meet DSM-5 criteria for OUD;
  • Age 21-60 yr;
  • Right handed;
  • Males and non-pregnant/non-lactating females;
  • cognitively intact (total IQ score >80 on Shipley Institute of Living Scale);
  • Screening cardiovascular indices within ranges for safe use of the pharmacological stressor: resting HR 50-90 bpm, systolic BP 90-140 mmHg, and diastolic BP 50-90 mmHg;
  • Use alcohol and/or marijuana <3 times/week; each "time" should consist of <1 marijuana "joint" equivalent and <3 alcoholic drinks.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Under influence of any substance during session;
  • Past 7-day use of illicit drugs other than opioids (except marijuana, which is legal in Michigan);
  • Urinalysis positive for cocaine metabolites, benzodiazepines, barbiturates, amphetamines or pregnancy;
  • Medical conditions prohibiting use of rTMS (e.g. seizure history; based on rTMS screening questionnaire);
  • Lifetime diagnosis of: psychotic disorder, bipolar disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, or obsessive compulsive disorder; major depression in the past 5 years; or potentially antisocial personality disorder (if the clinical psychologist judges such behaviors to be potentially disruptive or unsafe in our lab);
  • Past-year SUD other than OUD;
  • Acute/unstable illness: conditions making it unsafe for participation (e.g. neurological, cardiovascular, pulmonary, or systemic diseases);
  • Lactose intolerance (placebo dose);
  • Any prohibited medications: medications that lower seizure threshold, psychiatric medications, prescription pain medications, or blood pressure medications;
  • Chronic head or neck pain; and
  • Past-month participation in a research study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: placebo stressor, sham rTMS
Placebo stressor (lactose) + sham (inactive) rTMS over the left dlPFC
lactose (inside capsule)
inactive stimulation over the left dlPFC
Experimental: placebo stressor, active rTMS
Placebo stressor (lactose) + active 10Hz rTMS over the left dlPFC
lactose (inside capsule)
10Hz rTMS over the left dlPFC
Experimental: active stressor, sham rTMS
Stressor (yohimbine 54mg + hydrocortisone 20mg) + sham (inactive) rTMS over the left dlPFC
inactive stimulation over the left dlPFC
Yohimbine (54mg bulk powder inside capsule) administered in combination with Hydrocortisone (20mg tablet inside capsule)
Experimental: active stressor, active rTMS
Stressor (yohimbine 54mg + hydrocortisone 20mg) + active 10Hz rTMS over the left dlPFC
10Hz rTMS over the left dlPFC
Yohimbine (54mg bulk powder inside capsule) administered in combination with Hydrocortisone (20mg tablet inside capsule)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Color-Word Stroop Task
Time Frame: change from pre- to post-intervention in each of 4 sessions (through study completion, about 1 month total)
measures cognitive control in response to opioid-related words.
change from pre- to post-intervention in each of 4 sessions (through study completion, about 1 month total)
Digit Span Task
Time Frame: change from pre- to post-intervention in each of 4 sessions (through study completion, about 1 month total)
measures verbal working memory. Participants are asked to repeat strings of numbers of increasing length, both forward and backward.
change from pre- to post-intervention in each of 4 sessions (through study completion, about 1 month total)
Wisconsin Card Sorting Task
Time Frame: change from pre- to post-intervention in each of 4 sessions (through study completion, about 1 month total)
measures ability to shift set and assesses cognitive flexibility.
change from pre- to post-intervention in each of 4 sessions (through study completion, about 1 month total)
Emotion Regulation Task
Time Frame: change from pre- to post-intervention in each of 4 sessions (through study completion, about 1 month total)
subjects rate the unpleasantness and arousal of different emotional pictures
change from pre- to post-intervention in each of 4 sessions (through study completion, about 1 month total)
Positive and Negative Affect Schedule
Time Frame: change from pre- to post-intervention in each of 4 sessions (through study completion, about 1 month total)
subjects rate their positive and negative affect
change from pre- to post-intervention in each of 4 sessions (through study completion, about 1 month total)
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory
Time Frame: change from pre- to post-intervention in each of 4 sessions (through study completion, about 1 month total)
subjects rate their level state anxiety
change from pre- to post-intervention in each of 4 sessions (through study completion, about 1 month total)
Monetary Incentive Delay Task
Time Frame: change from pre- to post-intervention in each of 4 sessions (through study completion, about 1 month total)
Participants respond to a visual target that follows 2 different cues: incentive or non-incentive. No reward or punishment occurs on non-incentive trials. On incentive trials, participants must respond within a fixed amount of time. In the reward condition, responses within that time result in receiving the incentive , else nothing. In the punishment condition, the participant will lose money if they do not respond within the time limit
change from pre- to post-intervention in each of 4 sessions (through study completion, about 1 month total)
Delay Discounting Task
Time Frame: change from pre- to post-intervention in each of 4 sessions (through study completion, about 1 month total)
Participants perform a brief (<1min) hypothetical version of the traditional monetary task with a 5-trial adjusting delay previously validated to rapidly assess discount rate
change from pre- to post-intervention in each of 4 sessions (through study completion, about 1 month total)
Drug/Money Choice Task
Time Frame: change from pre- to post-intervention in each of 4 sessions (through study completion, about 1 month total)
participants choose hypothetically between a constant amount of their preferred opioid ($10 unit dose) or money ($2)
change from pre- to post-intervention in each of 4 sessions (through study completion, about 1 month total)
Systolic blood pressure
Time Frame: change from pre- to post-intervention in each of 4 sessions (through study completion, about 1 month total)
millimeters mercury (mmHg)
change from pre- to post-intervention in each of 4 sessions (through study completion, about 1 month total)
Diastolic blood pressure
Time Frame: change from pre- to post-intervention in each of 4 sessions (through study completion, about 1 month total)
millimeters mercury (mmHg)
change from pre- to post-intervention in each of 4 sessions (through study completion, about 1 month total)
Heart rate
Time Frame: change from pre- to post-intervention in each of 4 sessions (through study completion, about 1 month total)
beats per minute
change from pre- to post-intervention in each of 4 sessions (through study completion, about 1 month total)
Saliva cortisol level
Time Frame: change from pre- to post-intervention in each of 4 sessions (through study completion, about 1 month total)
measure of the activity of the HPA axis
change from pre- to post-intervention in each of 4 sessions (through study completion, about 1 month total)
Saliva alpha-amylase level
Time Frame: change from pre- to post-intervention in each of 4 sessions (through study completion, about 1 month total)
indirect measure of adrenergic stimulation
change from pre- to post-intervention in each of 4 sessions (through study completion, about 1 month total)
Serum prolactin level
Time Frame: change from pre- to post-intervention in each of 4 sessions (through study completion, about 1 month total)
indirect measure of dopamine stimulation
change from pre- to post-intervention in each of 4 sessions (through study completion, about 1 month total)
Serum brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) level
Time Frame: change from pre- to post-intervention in each of 4 sessions (through study completion, about 1 month total)
indirect measure of brain derived neurotrophic factor activation
change from pre- to post-intervention in each of 4 sessions (through study completion, about 1 month total)
Relative electroencephalogram (EEG) gamma power
Time Frame: change from pre- to post-intervention in each of 4 sessions (through study completion, about 1 month total)
Prefrontal gamma (25-100 Hz) EEG power, relative to slow-wave EEG power, is a stress biomarker
change from pre- to post-intervention in each of 4 sessions (through study completion, about 1 month total)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Opioid craving
Time Frame: change from pre- to post-intervention in each of 4 sessions (through study completion, about 1 month total)
Desire for Drug Questionnaire total score; higher scores indicate greater craving
change from pre- to post-intervention in each of 4 sessions (through study completion, about 1 month total)
Opioid agonist symptoms
Time Frame: change from pre- to post-intervention in each of 4 sessions (through study completion, about 1 month total)
Opiate-32 questionnaire agonist symptom total score; higher scores indicate greater opioid symptom severity
change from pre- to post-intervention in each of 4 sessions (through study completion, about 1 month total)
Opioid withdrawal symptoms
Time Frame: change from pre- to post-intervention in each of 4 sessions (through study completion, about 1 month total)
Opiate-32 questionnaire withdrawal symptom total score; higher scores indicate greater withdrawal severity
change from pre- to post-intervention in each of 4 sessions (through study completion, about 1 month total)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

October 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 9, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 13, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

January 18, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 12, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 7, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Opioid Use Disorder

Clinical Trials on Placebo

3
Subscribe