First In Human Study Evaluating the Safety and Performance of the "LapBox" Containment System for Laparoscopic Tissue Morcellation

January 15, 2020 updated by: ARKSurgical
Study to assess the safety, and performance of the LapBox in patients in terms of duration of deployment, organ insertion into the "LapBox" bag, ease of use, success of containment and performance.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The LapBox is intended for use as a laparoscopic instrument port and tissue containment system that creates a working space allowing for visualization during power or manual morcellation procedure following a laparoscopic procedure for the excision of benign gynecologic tissue that is not suspected to contain malignancy Ten (10) adult female patients, scheduled for the laparoscopic gynecological procedure, with up to 700gr mass to be removed and with no suspicion of malignancy.

Patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic hysterectomy, myomectomy or removal of an adnexal mass where either manual morcellation or power morcellation is needed for tissue will be enrolled. Each patient will be required to participate in 3 visits:

Visit 1: Screening and Enrollment, as part of the pre-operative visit and confirmation of compliance. Such a visit can be more than 1 day.

Visit 2: Laparoscopic organ removal procedure- morcellation utilizing LapBox containment system.

Visit 3:up appointment up to 7 weeks (7 days) post-procedure.

During visit 2 (laparoscopic organ removal procedure), the following steps will be performed:

  • Following tissue harvest and prior to morcellation, a peritoneal wash sample will be obtained for a cytology evaluation.
  • The LapBox will then be inserted to the patient abdomen through the abdominal wall and deployed.
  • The harvested tissue will be inserted into the LapBox using standard technique.
  • The LapBox opening will be extracted outside the abdomen.
  • Depending on the type of morcellation (power or mechanical), the incision may be extended as needed.
  • The appropriate type of port will be placed.

Power morcellation:

  • The morcellator will be inserted.
  • The laparoscope will be placed inside the bag and provide visualization of the procedure. Alternatively, direct visualization may be utilized.
  • The morcellator will be operated in a standardized fashion. Manual morcellation will be performed as per standard practice.
  • The LapBox will be removed through the abdominal opening. A second peritoneal wash sample will be obtained for a cytology evaluation in order to compare pre and post morcellation findings.

Following the procedure, tissue weight will be recorded, and leakage testing will be performed on used devices.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 50 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Female patients indicated for elective surgery requiring laparoscopic hysterectomy, myomectomy where either manual morcellation or power morcellation is needed for tissue removal at which a morcellator for cutting and extraction of tissue is required.
  2. Pre- menopausal woman patient age 18-50 years
  3. Mass measured with diameter up to 10 cm to be removed
  4. Normal Pap test result within the last 24 months prior to enrollment
  5. Normal and /or Non-Clinically Significant as per investigator discretion CBC and Blood chemistry test within at least 6 months prior to surgery.
  6. Signed an informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Emergency cases
  2. Abdominal wall thickness is greater than 10 cm according to US measurements.
  3. Patient requires procedure involving the ovaries (e.g., Oophorectomy, Salpingo)
  4. Patient is defined as a "high risk" patient for developing cancer (per standard assessment, including but not limited to imaging)
  5. Suspicion of malignant or pre-malignant tissue according to preoperative assessment including US exam within 30 days prior to surgery
  6. Known or suspected gynecologic malignancy within the past five years
  7. Pacemaker, internal defibrillator/cardio converter
  8. Previous extensive pelvic surgery or any other medical procedure which in the investigator's judgment contraindicates the patient's participation
  9. Contraindications to anesthesia or abdominal surgery. ASA score above 3
  10. Concurrent participation in any other clinical study
  11. Active infection at the time of the procedure.
  12. BMI<20 or BMI>40
  13. Known history or presence of any medical disorder, which in the investigator's judgment contraindicates the patient's participation (e.g., Known and documented active liver disease, renal failure, cognitive disorder, cardiopulmonary disease, impaired coagulation parameters, etc.)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
OTHER: open lable
Prospective, open-label
The "LapBox" is working space (bag) intended for use as a laparoscopic instrument port and tissue containment system that creates a working space allowing for visualization during power or manual morcellation procedure following a laparoscopic procedure for the excision of benign gynecologic tissue that is not suspected to contain malignancy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Device Related Adverse Events Occurrence
Time Frame: through study procedure, up to 10 weeks from procedure
Occurrence of device use related adverse events as documented and reported, under DSMB review
through study procedure, up to 10 weeks from procedure
Device Performance and Integrity
Time Frame: following completion of procedure and study device use (1 day)

Leak testing will be performed following the each procedure to confirm device integrity.

Used device will be filled with color fluid to provide clear identification of possible leakage. Test will performed by Investigator delegated study team member and results will be documented in CRF.

following completion of procedure and study device use (1 day)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Device performance
Time Frame: up to 10 weeks following the procedure
Comparison of the presence of cancerous cells pre and post morcellation via peritoneal wash sample cytology
up to 10 weeks following the procedure
Device Performance (usability)
Time Frame: following completion of procedure and study devise use (1 day)
Ease of use of the device (usability evaluation via questionnaire).
following completion of procedure and study devise use (1 day)
Device Performance
Time Frame: through study procedure, up to 10 weeks from procedure
Intra- or post-operative complications, Adverse Events and Device Related Adverse Events
through study procedure, up to 10 weeks from procedure
Device Performance
Time Frame: following completion of procedure and study device use (1 day)
Procedure time
following completion of procedure and study device use (1 day)
Device Performance
Time Frame: up to 10 weeks following the procedure
Hospitalization length
up to 10 weeks following the procedure
Device Performance
Time Frame: following completion of procedure and study devise use (1 day)
Specimen (removed tissue) weight collection
following completion of procedure and study devise use (1 day)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Roy Mashiach, Dr, Assuta Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
  • Principal Investigator: Yuval Kaufman, Dr, Assuta Haifa Medical Center, Haifa, Israel

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

January 25, 2020

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

May 1, 2020

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

May 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 24, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 15, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

January 18, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

January 18, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 15, 2020

Last Verified

January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ARK-001

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Laparoscopic Surgical Procedure

Clinical Trials on Laparoscopic Tissue Morcellation working space (bag)

3
Subscribe