- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04232735
Evidence Based Information Provision to Improve Decision Making After Oesophagogastric Cancer Diagnosis (SOURCE) (SOURCE)
Stimulating Evidence Based, Personalized and Tailored Information Provision to Improve Decision Making After Oesophagogastric CancEr Diagnosis - a Pragmatic Stepped Wedge Trial-
The overarching aim of the programme 'Stimulating evidence based, personalized and tailored information provision to improve decision making after oesophagogastric cancer diagnosis' (SOURCE) is to provide oesophagogastric cancer patients at all disease stages with evidence based and personalized information about survival, treatment-related side-effects and/or complications and health related quality of life, tailored to patients' specific information needs, to facilitate informed decision making about treatment and thereby optimize personal care and outcomes.
For this purpose the Source tool and training were designed. The Source tool is a prediction model based website to be used by care givers for informing patients about the outcomes of treatment. The Source training for care givers is designed to learn care givers how to inform patients effectively, especially about the outcomes of treatment.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The overarching aim of the programme 'Stimulating evidence based, personalized and tailored information provision to improve decision making after oesophagogastric cancer diagnosis' (SOURCE) is to provide oesophagogastric cancer patients at all disease stages with evidence based and personalized information about survival, treatment-related side-effects and/or complications and health related quality of life, tailored to patients' specific information needs, to facilitate informed decision making about treatment and thereby optimize personal care and outcomes.
For this purpose the Source tool and training were designed. The Source tool is a prediction model based website to be used by care givers for informing patients about the outcomes of treatment. The Source training for care givers is designed to learn care givers how to inform patients effectively, especially about the outcomes of treatment.
The primary aim of the SOURCE trial is to investigate the effect of the tool and training on the (numerical) precision of information about outcomes of treatment in the treatment information consultation. Secondary outcomes include: patients' satisfaction, evaluation and knowledge of the information provided by the health care provider, evaluation of the decision made and health related quality of life.
A pragmatic stepped wedge design will be used to test the effect of intervention. 21 health care providers will include 3 patients as control measurements (before intervention) and 3 patients as intervention measurements (after intervention). Participating centers will be divided into geographical subgroups, in which the transition period (in which the intervention will take place) will be spread across time.
All oesophageal and gastric cancer patients scheduled for a treatment information consultation with a participating health care provider are suitable for inclusion and will be approached for participation in the SOURCE study. Measurements include audio recordings of the treatment information consultation and questionnaires filled in by patients and health care providers at different moments in time. Audio recordings will be scored and analyzed based on a study specific coding scheme.
The investigators estimate the physical burden/risk of this study to be negligible.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Loïs F. van de Water, MSc.
- Phone Number: 020-5665955
- Email: l.f.vandewater@amsterdamumc.nl
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Hanneke WM van Laarhoven, Prof. Dr.
- Phone Number: 020-5665955
- Email: hvanlaarhoven@amsterdamumc.nl
Study Locations
-
-
-
Almere, Netherlands
- Recruiting
- Flevoziekenhuis
-
Contact:
- Loïs F van de Water, MSc.
-
Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Recruiting
- VUMC
-
Contact:
- Loïs F van de Water, MSc.
-
Arnhem, Netherlands
- Not yet recruiting
- Rijnstate
-
Contact:
- Loïs F van de Water, MSc.
-
Arnhem, Netherlands
- Not yet recruiting
- Radiotherapiegroep
-
Contact:
- Loïs F van de Water, MSc.
-
Eindhoven, Netherlands
- Not yet recruiting
- Catherina ziekenhuis
-
Contact:
- Loïs F van de Water, MSc.
-
Leiden, Netherlands
- Not yet recruiting
- LUMC
-
Contact:
- Loïs F. van de Water, MSc.
-
Maastricht, Netherlands
- Not yet recruiting
- Maastro
-
Contact:
- Loïs F van de Water, MSc.
-
Nijmegen, Netherlands
- Not yet recruiting
- Radboud UMC
-
Contact:
- Loïs F van de Water, MSc.
-
Tilburg, Netherlands
- Not yet recruiting
- BVI
-
Contact:
- Loïs F van de Water, MSc.
-
Tilburg, Netherlands
- Not yet recruiting
- ETZ
-
Contact:
- Loïs F van de Water, MSc.
-
Utrecht, Netherlands
- Not yet recruiting
- UMC Utrecht
-
Contact:
- Loïs F. van de Water, MSc.
-
-
Noord Holland
-
Amsterdam, Noord Holland, Netherlands, 1105AZ
- Recruiting
- Academic Medical Center
-
Contact:
- Loïs F van de Water, MSc.
- Phone Number: +31205665955
- Email: l.f.vandewater@amsterdamumc.nl
-
Principal Investigator:
- Hanneke WM van Laarhoven, MD, PhD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Health care providers:
- Specialist, physician assistant or nurse practitioner in the field of oncology, oncological radiotherapy or oncological surgery who are used to discussing treatment and treatment outcome with patients
- Informed consent for data collection
- Three audiorecorded treatment information consultations with oesophageal or gastric cancer patients before the scheduled transition period (control measurements)
- Three audiorecorded treatment information consultations with oesophageal or gastric cancer patients after the scheduled transition period (intervention measurements) and before the scheduled end date of the study
Patients:
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Histological or cytological proof of oesophageal or gastric cancer
- Informed consent for trial data collection A treatment information consultation with a participating doctor to discuss either curative treatment, first line palliative treatment, and/or best supportive care.
Exclusion Criteria:
Health care providers:
- Less than two control and/or intervention measurements
Patients:
- Cognitive impairment or insufficient understanding of the Dutch language
- GIST and smallcell carcinomas.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: OTHER
- Allocation: NA
- Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
- Masking: NONE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
EXPERIMENTAL: Intervention
The Source tool is used by care givers for informing patients about the outcomes of treatment. Prediction models are developed and built in the website in order to generate a personalized prediction of the outcomes: survival, toxicity and/or complications and HRQL. These predictions are visualized in clear and comprehensible graphs with a broad variation of options available for tailoring of the visualizations. In order for care givers to be able to use this tool effectively, we designed the Source training. This communication skills training is comprised of an e-learning, two face-to-face group sessions and an individual booster session. Aside from an instruction video on the navigation within the Source tool, the e-learning consists of theory and tips and tricks on how to inform patients and communicate risks. The face-to-face components of the training are focused on getting the skilled use of the source tool into practice, by receiving personal feedback on the performance. |
The Source tool aims to assist health care providers with giving evidence based information about treatment outcomes by providing visualizations of personalized predictions of treatment outcomes for different treatments of oesophageal and gastric cancer. These predictions result from recently designed and updated prediction models on the survival, toxicity, complications and health related quality of life of oesophageal and gastric cancer patients. The training aims to teach participants to inform patients about outcomes of treatment. The training is placed in the context of shared decision making (SDM), following the 4-step model by Stiggelbout et al., 2015.8 The training is provided in small groups (3-6 participants) by an experienced trainer and supported by professional actors. The training aims to address knowledge, attitude and skills. |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
SOURCE observational scale
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
The SOURCE observational scale is developed to primary answer the following question: Does the combination of the tool and the training improve observed (numerical) precision of information about treatment outcomes in clinical consultations?
Min.
value: 1 Max.
value:4 Higher scores mean higher (numerical) precision
|
through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Continuing professional development (CPD) reaction Questionnaire
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Health care providers' intention to inform patients about treatment outcomes using numbers (effect training only)
|
through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ-5 patient and doctor version)
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Patient and physician satisfaction with communication and decision making
|
2 weeks
|
Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDMQ-9)
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Patient-reported shared decision making
|
2 weeks
|
Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS)
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Patients' evaluation of the decision made
|
2 weeks
|
EORTC QLQ - INFO25 + tailor made items on treatment outcome information
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Patients' evaluation and knowledge of the information provided by the health care provider
|
2 weeks
|
EORTC QLQ-C30
Time Frame: 3 months vs. baseline
|
Patients' health related quality of life, cancer specific
|
3 months vs. baseline
|
EORTC QLQ-OG25
Time Frame: 3 months vs. baseline
|
Patients' health related quality of life, gastro-intestinal cancer specific
|
3 months vs. baseline
|
Trust in the Oncologist Scale (TiOS-sf)
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Patients' trust in the health care provider
|
2 weeks
|
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
Time Frame: 2 weeks vs. baseline
|
Patients' anxiety
|
2 weeks vs. baseline
|
((Mini-)Mental Adjustment to Cancer scale ((Mini-)MAC)
Time Frame: 2 weeks vs. baseline
|
Patients' helplessness/hopelessness + fighting spirit
|
2 weeks vs. baseline
|
Duration of consultation in minutes (min.)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Consultation time
|
through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Health care providers' personalization of treatment outcome information measured with SOURCE observational scale
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Frequency of explicitly personalizing treatment outcome information, based on audio tapes Min.
value: 0 Max.
value: endless Higher values mean more utterances of personalization
|
through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Health care providers' tailoring of treatment outcome information measured with SOURCE observational scale
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Frequency of explicitly tailoring treatment outcome information, based on audio tapes Min.
value: 0 Max.
value: endless Higher values mean more utterances of tailoring
|
through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Health care providers' use of visualizations of treatment outcome information measured with SOURCE observational scale
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Frequency of explicitly showing visualizations treatment outcome information, based on audio tapes Min.
value: 0 Max.
value: endless Higher values mean more utterances of showing visualizations
|
through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Health care providers' use of time frames when giving treatment outcome information measured with SOURCE observational scale
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Presence of time frame when giving treatment outcome information, in utterances coded for the primary outcome Min.
value: 0 Max.
value: 1 Value 1 means time frame present, value 0 means time frame absent
|
through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Treatment outcome category of health care providers' treatment outcome information measured with SOURCE observational scale
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Treatment outcome category of health care providers' treatment outcome information, in utterances coded for the primary outcome Values: Survival, Health-related Quality of Life, Side effects and complications, Progression of tumor Non-ordinal variable
|
through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Person initializing treatment outcome information measured with SOURCE observational scale
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Person taking the initaitive for the health care provider's treatment outcome information, in utterances coded for the primary outcome Values: Health care provider, Patient Non-ordinal variable
|
through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Health care providers' (numerical) precision of treatment outcome information measured with SOURCE observational scale simulated patient consultations (effect intervention)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Health care providers' (numerical) precision of treatment outcome information measured in simulated patient consultations (effect intervention) Min.
value: 1 Max.
value:4 Higher scores mean higher (numerical) precision
|
through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Observed presence of Source tool measured with SOURCE observational scale
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Health care providers' observed use of the Source tool Min.
value: 0 Max.
value:1 Value 0 means absence of Source tool in consultation, Value 1 means presence of Source tool in conversation
|
through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
SOURCE evaluation questionnaire (tailor made evaluation questionnaire)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Health care providers' evaluation of the Source tool, training and e-learning Min value: 1 Max value: 10 Higher scores mean better evaluations
|
through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: H WM van Laarhoven, Prof. Dr., Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- W19_094#19.124
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Gastric Cancer
-
City of Hope Medical CenterRecruitingGastric Cancer | Gastric Adenocarcinoma | Gastric Cancer Stage IV | Gastric Neoplasm | Gastric Cancer Metastatic to Lung | Gastric Cancer Stage | Gastric Cancer Metastatic to Liver | Gastric Cancer Stage III | Gastric Cancer Stage II | Gastric Lesion | Gastric Cancer in Situ | Gastric Cancer Stage IIIB | Gastric... and other conditionsUnited States, Japan
-
City of Hope Medical CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Active, not recruitingGastric Adenocarcinoma | Clinical Stage III Gastric Cancer AJCC v8 | Clinical Stage 0 Gastric Cancer AJCC v8 | Clinical Stage I Gastric Cancer AJCC v8 | Clinical Stage II Gastric Cancer AJCC v8 | Clinical Stage IIA Gastric Cancer AJCC v8 | Clinical Stage IIB Gastric Cancer AJCC v8 | Pathologic Stage... and other conditionsUnited States
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Active, not recruitingGastric Adenocarcinoma | Clinical Stage III Gastric Cancer AJCC v8 | Clinical Stage I Gastric Cancer AJCC v8 | Clinical Stage IIA Gastric Cancer AJCC v8 | Clinical Stage IVA Gastric Cancer AJCC v8 | Pathologic Stage IB Gastric Cancer AJCC v8 | Pathologic Stage II Gastric Cancer AJCC v8 | Pathologic... and other conditionsUnited States
-
City of Hope Medical CenterActive, not recruitingAdenocarcinoma of the Gastroesophageal Junction | Stage IV Gastric Cancer | Recurrent Gastric Cancer | Diffuse Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach | Intestinal Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach | Mixed Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach | Stage IIIA Gastric Cancer | Stage IIIB Gastric Cancer | Stage IIIC Gastric Cancer and other conditionsUnited States
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedGastric Adenocarcinoma | Stage IV Gastric Cancer | Stage II Gastric Cancer | Stage III Gastric CancerUnited States
-
Mayo ClinicNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedGastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma | Gastric Cardia Adenocarcinoma | Stage IB Gastric Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage II Gastric Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IIA Gastric Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IIB Gastric Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IIIA Gastric Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IIIB Gastric Cancer AJCC v7United States
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedAdenocarcinoma of the Gastroesophageal Junction | Stage IV Gastric Cancer | Recurrent Gastric Cancer | Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach | Stage IIIA Gastric Cancer | Stage IIIB Gastric Cancer | Stage IIIC Gastric CancerUnited States
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedGastric Cancer | Gastric NeoplasmsUnited States
-
AIO-Studien-gGmbHBristol-Myers SquibbCompletedGastric Cancer | Esophageal Cancer | Adenocarcinoma Gastric | Metastatic Gastric Cancer | GastroEsophageal Cancer | HER2 Positive Gastric CancerGermany
-
Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyNational Cancer Institute (NCI)RecruitingGastric Adenocarcinoma | Epstein-Barr Virus Positive | Mismatch Repair Protein Deficiency | Stage IB Gastric Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage II Gastric Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IIA Gastric Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IIB Gastric Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage III Gastric Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IIIA Gastric Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage... and other conditionsUnited States
Clinical Trials on Tool and training
-
Pusan National University HospitalCompleted
-
Boston Children's HospitalHarvard Risk Management FoundationCompletedPatient Safety | Resident Workflow | Resident ExperienceUnited States
-
Brigham and Women's HospitalUnited States Department of Defense; Walter Reed Army Medical Center; Madigan...Completed
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentVA Palo Alto Health Care System; VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System; VA Ann Arbor...Enrolling by invitationHepatocellular Carcinoma | CirrhosisUnited States
-
Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyUniversity of OsloActive, not recruiting
-
University of Wisconsin, MadisonJohns Hopkins University; University of Colorado, Denver; Northwestern University and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingKidney Diseases | Kidney Failure, Chronic | Communication | End-Stage Renal Disease | Palliative Care | End of Life | Dialysis | Renal Dialysis | Decision Making | Decision Aid | Decision Support Techniques | Nephrologists | Late-Stage Renal Disease | Life-Supporting TreatmentsUnited States
-
Stanford UniversityActive, not recruitingVaccine Hesitancy | Vaccine Refusal | Vaccine KnowledgeKenya
-
Hospices Civils de LyonRecruiting
-
AirEmail Holdings LimitedRecruitingBurnout, Professional | Communication Research | Work Related Stress | Well-Being, Psychological | TechnostressUnited Kingdom
-
Chang Gung Memorial HospitalCompleted