Tiny Cargo, Big Deal! An ED-Based Study of Child Passenger Safety Behaviors

March 25, 2026 updated by: Michelle Macy, MD, Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago

Tiny Cargo, Big Deal! An Adaptive ED-Based eHealth Intervention to Promote Correct and Consistent Size-Appropriate Child Passenger Safety Behaviors and Reduce Disparities

This study involves an emergency department (ED)-based intervention utilizing Motivational Interviewing (MI) techniques and patient-centered eHealth materials (e.g., a tailored, mobile-friendly website and text messages) to promote the correct and consistent use of size-appropriate child passenger restraints (car seats, booster seats, and seat belts). This study is designed as an adaptive randomized controlled trial, recruiting English and Spanish speaking caregivers of children 6 months to 10 years old.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Motor vehicle collisions (MVCs) remain the leading cause of unintentional injury deaths among children in the United States (U.S.) and racial/ethnic minority children are disproportionately impacted as suboptimal child passenger safety behaviors are more prevalent in some communities. Existing universal approaches to promote child passenger safety have fallen short of ensuring that all child passengers are correctly using size-appropriate child passenger restraints according to guidelines published by the American Academy of Pediatrics and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Precision prevention programs are urgently needed to improve child passenger safety behaviors among caregivers who have not been responsive to guidelines, laws, and public education campaigns. The proposed research will test the efficacy of Tiny Cargo, Big Deal/Abróchame Bien, Cuídame Bien (TCBD/ABCB), a bilingual emergency department (ED)-based precision prevention intervention grounded in Self-Determination Theory. TCBD/ABCB integrates personalized counseling based on principles of motivational interviewing (MI) and eHealth components including a tailored educational mobile-friendly website "site" and short message service (SMS) communications with the goal of improving child passenger safety. We hypothesize that by providing tailored child passenger safety education and personalized skills for restraint use in a manner that supports autonomous motivation the TCBD/ABCB intervention will be more efficacious than universal approaches (laws/guidelines) for realizing correct use of size-appropriate child passenger restraints.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

513

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 months to 10 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Child refers to the child of the caregiver (parent/legal guardian) who is being evaluated for recruitment and participation in the study.

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Child is age 6 months to 10 years old at screening
  • Child is seeking care in the Emergency Department (ED) for a non-critical injury or illness
  • Child sought emergency or urgent care at a study site
  • Caregiver/parent is the legal guardian of the child who is receiving or received emergency or urgent care at a study site
  • Child is less than 55 inches tall
  • Caregiver speaks English or Spanish
  • Caregiver is 18 years old or older
  • Caregiver screening survey responses indicate: child travels at least once per week in a passenger vehicle
  • AND child is able to use a standard car seat or booster seat (child restraint system) but is not using an age and size-appropriate child restraint system OR travels unrestrained OR sits in the vehicle front seat OR caregiver plans to stop using the age and size-appropriate restraint in the next 6 months (planned premature transition)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Caregiver does not understand/speak English or Spanish
  • Child is seeking/sought care for child abuse/neglect
  • Child is seeking/sought care that requires intensive psychosocial services
  • Child is seeking/sought treatment for a motor vehicle related injury
  • Child is too tall for study (height = >55 inches tall)
  • Caregiver is under 18 years of age
  • Caregiver does not have a smart phone
  • Caregiver lives outside of the state of Illinois
  • Caregiver is already enrolled in this study
  • Caregiver completed the screen to determine eligibility for study in the past 6 months

Exclusions applied only to in-person recruitment in the ED:

  • Child is seeking treatment for a new long-term diagnosis
  • Child has anticipated need for admission
  • Child is seeking care for a critical illness or injury

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Enhanced Usual Care

Participants will be randomized after completion of the baseline survey and receive a basic information sheet (print or electronic).

Months 1-12: Participants receive monthly, unscheduled requests to submit photographs as their child usually travels. Feedback is provided for critical errors and misuse. Follow-up occurs at 6 months. Outcomes are assessed at 12 months.

Experimental: Basic Intervention

Participants will be randomized after completion of the baseline survey and receive a basic information sheet (print or electronic). Participants receive a counseling session, access to the study's tailored, educational website, and tailored informational and motivational text messages.

Months 1-6: Participants receive monthly, unscheduled requests to submit photographs as their child usually travels. Feedback is provided. Follow-up occurs at 6 months.

After completion of their 6 month follow-up, participants in the Basic Intervention group will be eligible for re-randomization if they continue to not adhere to guidelines or plan a premature transition.

Months 7-12: Participants continue to receive monthly, unscheduled requests to submit photographs as their child usually travels. Feedback is provided. Outcomes are assessed at 12 months.

A bilingual emergency department (ED)-based precision prevention intervention grounded in Self-Determination Theory. The Basic TCBD/ABCB intervention integrates one personalized counseling session based on principles of motivational interviewing (MI) and eHealth components including a tailored mobile-friendly educational website and short message service (SMS) text message communications with the goal of improving child passenger safety.

Participants receive monthly text message requests to submit photographs depicting the child as they usually travel. Feedback is provided via text message to correct any observed errors or misuse. Tailored informational and motivational text messages are sent twice each month.

Experimental: Enhanced Intervention

After completion of their 6 month follow-up, participants re-randomized to Enhanced Intervention receive Basic Intervention components plus an additional counseling session (Months 7/8) and additional tailored text messages (Months 7-12).

Months 7-12: Participants continue to receive monthly, unscheduled requests to submit photographs as their child usually travels. Feedback is provided. Outcomes are assessed at 12 months.

A bilingual emergency department (ED)-based precision prevention intervention grounded in Self-Determination Theory. The Basic TCBD/ABCB intervention integrates one personalized counseling session based on principles of motivational interviewing (MI) and eHealth components including a tailored mobile-friendly educational website and short message service (SMS) text message communications with the goal of improving child passenger safety.

Participants receive monthly text message requests to submit photographs depicting the child as they usually travel. Feedback is provided via text message to correct any observed errors or misuse. Tailored informational and motivational text messages are sent twice each month.

The Enhanced TCBD/ABCB Intervention includes a second motivational interviewing session. Basic Intervention text messages continue with an additional 1-2 tailored text messages per month.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Guideline Adherent Child Passenger Safety Behaviors at 6 Months
Time Frame: 6-Month Assessment

At the 6-month follow-up assessment, conducted remotely, we reassessed the child's restraint system use and safety behaviors. For this dichotomous outcome, caregivers were considered guideline adherent if: 1) the caregiver-reported usual restraint was age and size APPROPRIATE;* and 2) the child was reported to NEVER travel UNRESTRAINED; and 3) ALWAYS seated in the vehicle BACK SEAT.

*weight, height, and age parameters: Rear-facing appropriate if child <40 pounds; <40 inches; up to age 3 Forward-facing appropriate if child >=22 pounds, <65 pounds; >=28 inches, <49 inches, at least 3 years old Booster appropriate if child >=40 pounds, <100 pounds; High Back >=38 inches/Backless >=43 inches; <57 inches, at least 5 years old Seat Belt alone appropriate if child >=100 pounds; at least 57 inches

6-Month Assessment
Number of Participants With Guideline Adherent Child Passenger Safety Behaviors at 12 Months
Time Frame: 12-Month Assessment

At the 12-month follow-up assessment, conducted remotely, we reassessed the child's restraint system use. For this dichotomous outcome, caregivers were considered guideline adherent if: 1) the caregiver-reported usual restraint was age and size APPROPRIATE;* and 2) the child was reported to NEVER travel UNRESTRAINED; and 3) ALWAYS seated in the vehicle BACK SEAT.

*weight, height, and age parameters: Rear-facing appropriate if child <40 pounds; <40 inches; up to age 3 Forward-facing appropriate if child >=22 pounds, <65 pounds; >=28 inches, <49 inches, at least 3 years old Booster appropriate if child >=40 pounds, <100 pounds; High Back >=38 inches/Backless >=43 inches; <57 inches, at least 5 years old Seat Belt alone appropriate if child >=100 pounds; at least 57 inches

12-Month Assessment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
CPaSS Trajectories
Time Frame: 12 month follow-up
We will use latent growth curve models to identify characteristic trajectories for Child Passenger Safety Scores based on photographs of children as they typically travel obtained at baseline, months 1-4, 6-month assessment, months 8-11, and 12-month assessment.
12 month follow-up

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
CPaSS Trajectories
Time Frame: 12-Month Assessment
We will use latent growth curve models to identify characteristic trajectories for Child Passenger Safety Scores based on photographs of children as they typically travel obtained at baseline, months 1-4, 6-month assessment, months 8-11, and 12-month assessment.
12-Month Assessment
Child Passenger Safety Score (CPaSS)
Time Frame: 12-Month Assessment
At the 12-month follow-up assessment, we obtained photographs from the caregiver remotely or by research staff in-person. Photographs will be reviewed using the Child Passenger Safety Score checklist. Points will be deducted from a perfect score of 100 based on observe errors and misuse.
12-Month Assessment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michelle Macy, MD, Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 5, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 29, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

October 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 20, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 20, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

January 23, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 15, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 25, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual participant data that underlie the results, the study protocol, statistical analysis plan, and informed consent forms will be shared.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning 9 months and ending 36 months following article publication.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Accident, Traffic

Subscribe