Navigation Endoscopy to Reach Indeterminate Lung Nodules Versus Trans-Thoracic Needle Aspiration (VERITAS)

October 30, 2023 updated by: Fabien Maldonado, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center

Navigation Endoscopy to Reach Indeterminate Lung Nodules Versus Trans-Thoracic Needle Aspiration, a Randomized Controlled Study (VERITAS)

This study will evaluate which procedure is the best for patients referred for biopsy of a lung nodule (growth in the lung) meeting the size and location requirements of the protocol. Two different procedures are available for lung nodule biopsy:

  1. a computed tomography guided biopsy ("CT-guided biopsy") which consists of sampling the nodule from the "outside-in", through the chest wall with CT guidance, and
  2. navigation bronchoscopy, which is a procedure using technology designed to guide a catheter through the natural airway route (wind-pipe and bronchi) to access the nodule.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Endpoints:

Primary:

• To evaluate diagnostic yield

Secondary:

  • To evaluate rate of pneumothorax.
  • To evaluate rate of pneumothorax requiring chest tube placement.
  • To evaluate clinically significant bleeding (defined by bleeding requiring intervention).
  • To evaluate need for hospitalization after procedure.
  • To evaluate duration of the procedure.
  • To evaluate procedural factors associated with improved yield (type of biopsy, number of biopsies, use of radial ultrasound, presence of a bronchus sign, biopsy site).
  • To evaluate need for additional nodule biopsy.
  • To evaluate need for additional procedure for staging.
  • To evaluate radiation exposure from fluoroscopy-guided bronchoscopy and CT for CT-guided biopsy.
  • To evaluate need for F-Nav during navigation bronchoscopy.
  • To evaluate bronchoscopy yield defined as the combination of the primary endpoint (navigation diagnostic yield) and yield from endobronchial ultrasound-guided mediastinal and/or hilar lymph node biopsies.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

256

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92037
        • University of California, San Diego
    • Idaho
      • Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, United States, 83814
        • Kootenai Health
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612
        • Rush University Medical Center
    • Missouri
      • Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64111
        • Saint Luke's Hospital of Kansas City
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Duke University Medical Center
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232
        • Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center
    • Wisconsin
      • Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States, 53226
        • Medical College of Wisconsin

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient is referred for biopsy of a single indeterminate pulmonary nodule, with the following characteristics regarding size, location, accessibility, and probability of malignancy:

    • Intermediate pre-test probability of malignancy as defined by a pre-test probability of malignancy between 10% and 100%, using a validated clinical prediction model, which is either:

      • The Brock model14 if no PET scan data are available, or
      • The Herder model15 if PET-CT data are available.
    • Size between 10 and 30 mm (long diameter).
    • Location peripheral, here defined as occupying the middle or outer third lung zones.
    • Accessible via navigation bronchoscopy and also accessible via CT-guided biopsy (i.e. the nodule is clinically suited to equal access by either procedure), as confirmed by an independent interventional panel.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with proximal nodules, as defined by nodules present in the proximal 1/3 of the lung by dedicated software analysis (described below) will not be eligible for the study.
  • Patients with multiple nodules requiring biopsy (patients may have other nodules not considered for biopsy).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Navigation Bronchoscopy (NB) with F-Nav
A virtual three-dimensional map of the lung will be generated enabling the physician to perform an anatomically precise biopsy
Experimental: CT-guided Biopsy
Images will be generated by a CT scanner to accurately insert a needle into the lung nodule allowing a sample to be removed for testing

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic yield
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Rate of technically successful biopsies leading to a definitive diagnosis
Up to 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of pneumothorax
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Number of instances of pneumothorax
Up to 12 months
Rate of pneumothorax requiring chest tube placement
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Number of instances of pneumothorax requiring chest tube placement
Up to 12 months
Need for hospitalization after procedure
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Number of instances of hospitalization after a procedure
Up to 12 months
Duration of procedure
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Total time required to complete the procedure
Up to 12 months
Procedural factors associated with improved yield (type of biopsy)
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Count of type of biopsy
Up to 12 months
Procedural factors associated with improved yield (number of biopsies)
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Count of biopsies
Up to 12 months
Procedural factors associated with improved yield (use of radial ultrasound)
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Number of instances of use of radial ultrasound
Up to 12 months
Procedural factors associated with improved yield (presence of a bronchus sign)
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Count of presence of a bronchus sign
Up to 12 months
Procedural factors associated with improved yield (biopsy site)
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Count of biopsy site
Up to 12 months
Need for additional nodule biopsy
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Count of instances of need for an additional nodule biopsy
Up to 12 months
Need for additional procedure for staging
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Count of instances of need of an additional procedure for staging
Up to 12 months
Radiation exposure from fluoroscopy-guided bronchoscopy and CT for CT-guided biopsy
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Count of total radiation exposure from fluoroscopy-guided bronchoscopy
Up to 12 months
Radiation exposure from CT-guided biopsy
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Count of total radiation exposure from fluoroscopy-guided bronchoscopy
Up to 12 months
Need for F-Nav during navigation bronchoscopy
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Count of instances of need for F-Nav during navigation bronchoscopy
Up to 12 months
Bronchoscopy yield
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
The combination of the primary endpoint (navigation diagnostic yield) and yield from endobronchial ultrasound-guided mediastinal and/or hilar lymph node biopsies.
Up to 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Fabien Maldonado, MD, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 22, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 29, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

January 31, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 1, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 30, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • VICC THO 19102
  • NCI-2020-00632 (Registry Identifier: NCI, Clinical Trials Reporting Program)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lung Nodule

Clinical Trials on Navigation bronchoscopy

3
Subscribe