Is Long-term Use of Amantadine Effective in PD?

February 6, 2020 updated by: BS Jeon, Seoul National University Hospital

Is Long-term Use of Amantadine Effective in Parkinson Disease?

The investigator aims to assess whether long-term use of amantadine is effective in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Amantadine is used in the early stages of Parkinson's disease (PD). However, amantadine is known to be relatively weak compared to other antiparkinsonian drugs such as levodopa, dopamine agonist or Mao-B inhibitor and its effects are limited in early months, so it is rarely used than other drugs.

Recently, several studies have identified the long-term effects of amantadine on dyskinesia, but the basis is still insufficient.

Therefore, this study aims to investigate the long-term effectiveness of amantadine in patients with PD. Participants who have used amantadine since the early stages of diagnosis undergo clinical evaluations including the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS), Freezing of Gait-Questionnaire (FOG-Q), Non-motor Symptom Scale (NMSS) and Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39). Then, participants stop taking amantadine. To investigate the long-term effect, clinical evaluations except MoCA are repetitively assessed at 4- and 8-week follow-ups.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients who have been taking amantadine since the beginning of diagnosis
  2. Patients who have taken amantadine for more than five years
  3. Patients with Parkinson's disease who are aged 40 years or older

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient who stops amantadine or is hypersensitive to amantadine
  2. Patients who have undergone brain surgery, including deep brain stimulation
  3. Patient identified as atypical parkinsonism
  4. Patients with psychiatric conditions such as dementia, major depression or bipolar disorder who are difficult to assess
  5. Patients who are currently unable to follow up at our hospital

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: PD patients who have taken amantadine
Patients will discontinue amantadine, which has been taken since beginning of diagnosis.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 4-week f/u in Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III score
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks
Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III score will be used to determine the efficacy of amantadine. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. [minimum 0, maximum 132]
Baseline, 4 weeks
Change from baseline to 8-week f/u in Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III score
Time Frame: Baseline, 8 weeks
Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III score will be used to determine the efficacy of amantadine. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. [minimum 0, maximum 132]
Baseline, 8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 4-week f/u in Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part I score
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks
Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part I score will be used to determine the efficacy of amantadine. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. [minimum 0, maximum 52]
Baseline, 4 weeks
Change from baseline to 8-week f/u in Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part I score
Time Frame: Baseline, 8 weeks
Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part I score will be used to determine the efficacy of amantadine. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. [minimum 0, maximum 52]
Baseline, 8 weeks
Change from baseline to 4-week f/u in Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part II score
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks
Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part II score will be used to determine the efficacy of amantadine. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. [minimum 0, maximum 52]
Baseline, 4 weeks
Change from baseline to 8-week f/u in Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part II score
Time Frame: Baseline, 8 weeks
Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part II score will be used to determine the efficacy of amantadine. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. [minimum 0, maximum 52]
Baseline, 8 weeks
Change from baseline to 4-week f/u in Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part IV score
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks
Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part IV score will be used to determine the efficacy of amantadine. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. [minimum 0, maximum 24]
Baseline, 4 weeks
Change from baseline to 8-week f/u in Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part IV score
Time Frame: Baseline, 8 weeks
Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part IV score will be used to determine the efficacy of amantadine. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. [minimum 0, maximum 24]
Baseline, 8 weeks
Change from baseline to 4-week f/u in Hohr and Yahr stage score
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks
Hohr and Yahr stage score will be used to determine the efficacy of amantadine. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. [minimum 0, maximum 5]
Baseline, 4 weeks
Change from baseline to 8-week f/u in Hohr and Yahr stage score
Time Frame: Baseline, 8 weeks
Hohr and Yahr stage score will be used to determine the efficacy of amantadine. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. [minimum 0, maximum 5]
Baseline, 8 weeks
Change from baseline to 4-week f/u in Freezing of Gait Questionnaire score
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks
Freezing of Gait Questionnaire score will be used to determine the efficacy of amantadine. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. [minimum 0, maximum 24]
Baseline, 4 weeks
Change from baseline to 8-week f/u in Freezing of Gait Questionnaire score
Time Frame: Baseline, 8 weeks
Freezing of Gait Questionnaire score will be used to determine the efficacy of amantadine. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. [minimum 0, maximum 24]
Baseline, 8 weeks
Change from baseline to 4-week f/u in Non-motor Symptom Scale score
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks
Non-motor Symptom Scale score will be used to determine the efficacy of amantadine. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. [minimum 0, maximum 360]
Baseline, 4 weeks
Change from baseline to 8-week f/u in Non-motor Symptom Scale score
Time Frame: Baseline, 8 weeks
Non-motor Symptom Scale score will be used to determine the efficacy of amantadine. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. [minimum 0, maximum 360]
Baseline, 8 weeks
Change from baseline to 4-week f/u in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 score
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks
Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 score will be used to determine the efficacy of amantadine. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. [minimum 0, maximum 156]
Baseline, 4 weeks
Change from baseline to 8-week f/u in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 score
Time Frame: Baseline, 8 weeks
Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 score will be used to determine the efficacy of amantadine. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. [minimum 0, maximum 156]
Baseline, 8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

March 1, 2020

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

February 28, 2021

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

February 28, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 5, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

February 7, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 7, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson Disease

Clinical Trials on Determination of drug effects through amantadine cessation

3
Subscribe