Mindfulness-Based Relapse Prevention for Opioid and Alcohol Use Disorders (MBRP)

March 6, 2024 updated by: Heidi Zinzow, Clemson University

Randomized Controlled Trial of Mindfulness-Based Relapse Prevention for Opioid and Alcohol Use Disorders

A randomized controlled trial will examine mindfulness-based relapse prevention (MBRP) program outcomes for 240 individuals who have completed treatment for opioid or alcohol use disorders. MBRP is a group aftercare program that integrates mindfulness skills training with cognitive-behavioral relapse prevention strategies. Primary outcomes will include frequency of opioid/alcohol use, craving, withdrawal, and quality of life. Secondary outcomes include time to first opioid/alcohol use, adherence to medication-assisted treatment plans, perceived stress, posttraumatic stress symptoms, and chronic pain. We will also examine the following potential moderators of intervention outcomes: comorbid diagnoses, life events history, and MBRP intervention adherence. In addition, we will examine the following mediators of intervention outcome: mindfulness skills, emotion regulation skills, executive functioning skills, savoring, and positive and negative affect.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A randomized controlled trial will examine mindfulness-based relapse prevention (MBRP) program outcomes for 240 individuals who have completed treatment for opioid or alcohol use disorders. Participants will be recruited from outpatient medical clinics and substance use recovery centers. They will be assigned to an intervention group (Group 1) or waitlist control (Group 2), completing assessments at baseline, 8, and 16 weeks. Group 1 will receive the intervention in weeks 1-8 and group 2 will receive the intervention in weeks 9-16. MBRP is a group aftercare program that integrates mindfulness skills training with cognitive-behavioral relapse prevention strategies. Primary outcomes will include frequency of opioid/alcohol use, craving, withdrawal, and quality of life. Secondary outcomes include time to first opioid/alcohol use, adherence to medication-assisted treatment plans, perceived stress, posttraumatic stress symptoms, and chronic pain. We will also examine the following potential moderators of intervention outcomes: comorbid diagnoses, life events history, and MBRP intervention adherence. In addition, we will examine the following mediators of intervention outcome: mindfulness skills, emotion regulation skills, executive functioning skills, savoring, and positive and negative affect.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

11

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • South Carolina
      • Clemson, South Carolina, United States, 29634
        • Clemson University
      • Greenville, South Carolina, United States, 29605
        • Prisma Health-Upstate Internal Medicine Clinic
      • Greenville, South Carolina, United States, 29607
        • Phoenix Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • over 18 years of age
  • completed behavioral health treatment for Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) or Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) within the previous eight weeks
  • continues to be followed by a behavioral health provider
  • meets DSM-5 criteria for OUD or AUD
  • English fluency
  • able to attend intervention sessions

Exclusion Criteria

  • current psychosis
  • dementia
  • moderate to severe traumatic brain injury
  • pregnancy
  • active suicidality
  • persistent antisocial behavior
  • acute episode of an SUD (past two weeks)
  • persistent self-injury requiring clinical management
  • already completed or attending a mindfulness-based intervention

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Mindfulness Based Relapse Prevention
MBRP is a group aftercare program that integrates mindfulness skills training with cognitive-behavioral relapse prevention strategies. The intervention consists of eight weekly two-hour group therapy sessions, delivered by two facilitators with 6-12 people. The experimental group will complete the intervention in weeks 1-8. They will continue treatment as usual for weeks 9-16.
The intervention is a group skills training program that is delivered once weekly for eight weeks. Content focuses on mindfulness and cognitive-behavioral relapse prevention skills, including psychoeducation, experiential exercises, and between session homework assignments.
No Intervention: Control
The waitlist control group will not receive the MBRP program during weeks 1-8 and will continue treatment as usual. During weeks 9-16, the control group will receive MBRP.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in frequency of opioid/alcohol use
Time Frame: Baseline, 8 weeks (post-intervention for experimental group), 16 weeks (follow-up for experimental group, post-intervention for control group)
Frequency and time to first use will be assessed with both self-timeline follow-back method and collateral timeline follow-back for the past 60 days (Wray et al 2016; Donohue et al., 2004), as well as urine samples.
Baseline, 8 weeks (post-intervention for experimental group), 16 weeks (follow-up for experimental group, post-intervention for control group)
Change in opioid/alcohol craving
Time Frame: Baseline, 8 weeks (post-intervention for experimental group), 16 weeks (follow-up for experimental group, post-intervention for control group)
We will assess craving with the Penn Alcohol Craving Scale, which will be modified to assess opioid craving for individuals with opioid use disorder (Garland et al., 2014; Flannery, Volpicelli, & Pettinati, 1999). The Penn Scale is a 5 item self-report measure with scores ranging from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating higher levels of craving.
Baseline, 8 weeks (post-intervention for experimental group), 16 weeks (follow-up for experimental group, post-intervention for control group)
Change in withdrawal symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline, 8 weeks (post-intervention for experimental group), 16 weeks (follow-up for experimental group, post-intervention for control group)
Assessed with The Short Opiate Withdrawal Scale (Gossop, 1990) and the Short Alcohol Withdrawal Scale (Gossop et al., 2002). The Short Opiate Withdrawal Scale and the Short Alcohol Withdrawal Scale are each10 item self-report scales, with scores ranging from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating more withdrawal symptoms.
Baseline, 8 weeks (post-intervention for experimental group), 16 weeks (follow-up for experimental group, post-intervention for control group)
Change in quality of life: World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL)-BREF
Time Frame: Baseline, 8 weeks (post-intervention for experimental group), 16 weeks (follow-up for experimental group, post-intervention for control group)
Quality of life will be assessed with the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL)-BREF. The WHOQOL-BREF is a 26 item self-report measure that assesses four domains: physical health, psychological, social relationships, and environment. Transformed scores range from 0 to 100 for each of the four domains, with higher scores indicating greater quality of life.
Baseline, 8 weeks (post-intervention for experimental group), 16 weeks (follow-up for experimental group, post-intervention for control group)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in perceived stress
Time Frame: Baseline, 8 weeks (post-intervention for experimental group), 16 weeks (follow-up for experimental group, post-intervention for control group)
Perceived stress will be assessed with the Short Form Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-4) (Warttig et al 2013). This scale is 14 items and asks the frequency of feeling stressed on a 0 to 4 scale (total score range of 0-56), with higher scores indicating lower perceived stress.
Baseline, 8 weeks (post-intervention for experimental group), 16 weeks (follow-up for experimental group, post-intervention for control group)
Change in posttraumatic stress symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline, 8 weeks (post-intervention for experimental group), 16 weeks (follow-up for experimental group, post-intervention for control group)
The PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) will be used to assess PTSD symptoms (Weathers et al, 2013). This scale includes 20 items on a five point scale to assess for PTSD symptom severity. The total score ranges from 0 to 80 with higher scores indicate more severe symptoms.
Baseline, 8 weeks (post-intervention for experimental group), 16 weeks (follow-up for experimental group, post-intervention for control group)
Change in pain severity: Brief Pain Inventory
Time Frame: Baseline, 8 weeks (post-intervention for experimental group), 16 weeks (follow-up for experimental group, post-intervention for control group)
Pain severity will be assessed with the pain severity subscale of the Brief Pain Inventory (Cleeland & Ryan, 1994). The subscale consists of four self-report items (rated 0 to 10), with a total score ranging from 0 to 40. Higher scores indicate higher pain severity.
Baseline, 8 weeks (post-intervention for experimental group), 16 weeks (follow-up for experimental group, post-intervention for control group)
Change in medication adherence
Time Frame: Baseline, 8 weeks (post-intervention for experimental group), 16 weeks (follow-up for experimental group, post-intervention for control group)
Adherence to other medication treatments; 12-item self-report scale, scores range from 12-34, where lower scores indicate better adherence (adherence to medications not given as part of this study) (Kripalani et al. 2009)
Baseline, 8 weeks (post-intervention for experimental group), 16 weeks (follow-up for experimental group, post-intervention for control group)
Change in mindfulness skills
Time Frame: Baseline, 8 weeks (post-intervention for experimental group), 16 weeks (follow-up for experimental group, post-intervention for control group)
The Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (Baer et al, 2006) includes 39 self-report items assessing five dimensions of mindfulness. Items are rated on a 5 point scale ranging from 1 to 5, with total score ranging from 39 to 195. Higher scores indicate greater dispositional tendency to be mindful in daily life (e.g., observing, describing, acting with awareness, nonjudging of inner experience, nonreactivity to inner experiences).
Baseline, 8 weeks (post-intervention for experimental group), 16 weeks (follow-up for experimental group, post-intervention for control group)
Change in emotion regulation skills
Time Frame: Baseline, 8 weeks (post-intervention for experimental group), 16 weeks (follow-up for experimental group, post-intervention for control group)
The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale-Short Form (Kaufman et al., 2016) includes 18 items that assess four areas of emotion regulation: awareness/understanding, acceptance, ability to engage in goal-directed behavior, ability to control impulsive behavior. The items are rated on a 1 (almost never) to 5 (almost always) scale based on frequency of feelings and use of emotion regulation skills, with a total score range of 18-90. Higher scores reflect greater impairments in emotion regulation skills.
Baseline, 8 weeks (post-intervention for experimental group), 16 weeks (follow-up for experimental group, post-intervention for control group)
Change in executive functioning
Time Frame: Baseline, 8 weeks (post-intervention for experimental group), 16 weeks (follow-up for experimental group, post-intervention for control group)
The Executive Function Index has 27-item self-report inventory and assesses five facets of executive functioning (Spinella, 2005); Items rated "how well the following statement describes me" 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much), with a total score range of 27-135, with higher scores indicating higher levels of executive functioning.
Baseline, 8 weeks (post-intervention for experimental group), 16 weeks (follow-up for experimental group, post-intervention for control group)
Change in Savoring
Time Frame: Baseline, 8 weeks (post-intervention for experimental group), 16 weeks (follow-up for experimental group, post-intervention for control group)
The Savoring Beliefs Inventory (Bryant, 2003) is a 24-item self-report instrument with three subscales: anticipating, savoring the moment, and reminiscing. These items are rated on a 1 to 5 scale, half with a negative anchor and half with a positive anchor. Total scores can range from -72 to +72, with higher scores indicating higher levels of savoring.
Baseline, 8 weeks (post-intervention for experimental group), 16 weeks (follow-up for experimental group, post-intervention for control group)
Change in positive and negative affect
Time Frame: Baseline, 8 weeks (post-intervention for experimental group), 16 weeks (follow-up for experimental group, post-intervention for control group)
The Positive and Negative Affect scales assess dispositional dimensions of affect (Watson, Clark, & Tellegen, 1998). Two separate subscales will be used. There are 10 items to evaluate positive affect and 10 items to evaluate negative affect with a range of 10-50 for each scale. Each item is rated according to frequency of feeling a certain way, with higher scores on each scale indicating higher positive or negative affect.
Baseline, 8 weeks (post-intervention for experimental group), 16 weeks (follow-up for experimental group, post-intervention for control group)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Satisfaction with Treatment
Time Frame: Assessed at 8 weeks for the experimental group and 16 weeks for the control group.
The Treatment Satisfaction Survey (Zgierska et al. 2008) is a 5 item self-report measure, with qualitative and quantitative items. The quantitative total scale ranges from 0 to 16, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction with mindfulness intervention.
Assessed at 8 weeks for the experimental group and 16 weeks for the control group.
Demographics
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline
Self-report items will assess gender identity, race/ethnicity, family income, health insurance status, educational attainment, marital status, and employment status.
Assessed at baseline
Adverse life event history
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline
The Adverse Life Events Questionnaire is a 10 item self-report scale assesses adverse events in the first 18 years of life (Felitti, 1998). Total scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater number or adverse events.
Assessed at baseline
Trauma History
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline
The Life Events Checklist for DSM-5 includes 17 self-report items that assess a number of different types of traumatic events across the lifespan and personal occurrence versus learning about a traumatic event (Weathers et al., 2013). There is no formal scoring protocol, although endorsing 1 or more items indicates lifetime exposure to a traumatic event.
Assessed at baseline
Comorbid Mental Health Conditions
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline
Current substance use disorders, major depressive disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder diagnoses will be assessed with the respective modules from the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (First, 2014). Each module includes structured interview questions in "yes/no" response format, with a scoring protocol that indicates whether the participant met criteria for the DSM-5 psychological disorder diagnosis. A categorical outcome will be used (scored "0" for did not meet criteria for the diagnosis, "1" for met criteria for the diagnosis).
Assessed at baseline
Psychological Treatment History
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline
The Adult Service Use Schedule includes 15 open-ended, self-report items assessing use of psychological services, accessibility, and length of service use (Bower et al., 2000).
Assessed at baseline
Intervention Adherence/Mindfulness Practice Frequency
Time Frame: Assessed at 8 weeks (post-intervention for experimental group), and 16 weeks (follow-up for experimental group, post-intervention for control group)
Additional mindfulness practices engaged in outside of the study sessions assessed with four self-report items: 'Did you engage in mindfulness meditation in the past month?' (yes = 1, no = 0), 'How many days per week did you engage in mindfulness meditation?' (range = 0-7), 'How long in minutes did you meditate per session of mindfulness meditation?' (range = 0 to unspecified), 'Describe your practice of mindfulness meditation (what exercises/activities/techniques did you practice?). Each quantitative item will be analyzed separately as moderators of intervention outcome and reported descriptively.
Assessed at 8 weeks (post-intervention for experimental group), and 16 weeks (follow-up for experimental group, post-intervention for control group)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lu Shi, Ph.D., Clemson University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 18, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 19, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

February 20, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 8, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alcohol Use Disorder

Clinical Trials on Mindfulness Based Relapse Prevention

3
Subscribe