Efficacy Study of a Neuropsychological Rehabilitation Intervention for Children With Non-symptomatic Epilepsy

March 24, 2020 updated by: IRCCS Eugenio Medea

Studio di Efficacia di Percorsi di Riabilitazione Neuropsicologica Tramite Piattaforma Lumosity: Evidenze Comportamentali e Neurofisiologiche in Pazienti Con Epilessia Non Sintomatica in età Pediatrica

Patients with non-symptomatic epilepsy, even in the presence of a normative cognitive functioning, present different levels of neuropsychological weaknesses, especially in executive functions and social competences. Such difficulties can significantly influence academic achievement and social inclusion. To date, there is limited evidence on small samples that training focusing on executive functions, also through tele-rehabilitation methods, may be effective in limiting these difficulties. Therefore, the purpose of this research project is to evaluate the effectiveness of a training of the executive functions (administered via the Lumosity platform) in patients with non-symptomatic focal and generalized epilepsy. A cognitive and behavioral assessment will be performed before and after the treatment to evaluate its efficacy. Moreover, a predefined neurophysiological marker will be recorded before and after treatment to detect changes in cortical activity which may reflect expected treatment effects.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

First, all eligible patients will be screened for inclusion and exclusion and will be assigned to the experimental group and the control group. The experimental group will participate in a remote rehabilitation program via Lumosity platform, providing video-games aimed at strengthening specific cognitive functions for 30 minutes a day, 5 days a week, for a total of 8 weeks. The control group will watch a series of animated / TV shows, again for 30 minutes a day, 5 days a week, for 8 weeks. Once a week the patient (or his family) will be contacted by the researcher to check the progress of the treatment. All patients will be evaluated within a week before the start of treatment and after the end of treatment with a standardized neuropsychological assessment battery (NEPSY-II) designed to evaluate the effects of the treatment. Patients (or their parents according to participants' age) will also compile a questionnaire to assess behavioral problems (CBCL); a questionnaire for the assessment of cognitive functions in an ecological context (BRIEF-2); a quality of life questionnaire (TACQOL) and ad-hoc treatment appreciation questionnaire. In addition to the cognitive-behavioral assessment, specific parameters of cortical activity will be recorded (via EEG), in order to evaluate any changes in predefined neurophysiological markers able to reflect the effects of the treatment. Evidence gathered from the literature reports that the relationship between theta and beta waves (the so-called theta/beta ratio) may be considered an index of a behavioral adaptation deficit in populations with poor executive control. Therefore, this index appears to be the ideal candidate to detect changes in cortical activity which may underlay behavioral effects of home rehabilitation treatment. Thus, resting-state cortical activity will be recorded before and after the treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

48

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

7 years to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis of non-symptomatic epilepsy;
  • Absence of intellectual disability (total IQ> 70);
  • Absence of significant visual, auditory or motor impairments that may prevent the use of the computerized training;
  • Basic ability to use PC.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of psychiatric comorbidity and / or behavioral disturbances that may hamper the participation to training sessions;
  • Diagnosis of photosensitive epilepsy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Home rehabilitation training
The rehabilitation training will be provided via Lumosity platform. Participants will be asked to play computer video-games aimed at strengthening specific sub-functions pertaining to the macro area of executive functions for 30 minutes a day, 5 days a week, for a total of 8 weeks. Specifically, 20 games out of a total of 64 available games provided by the platform have been selected. The selected games are aimed at training 4 cognitive skills: memory, attention, cognitive flexibility and problem solving. In particular, 5 different games were chosen for each cognitive ability.
Active Comparator: Home control activity
The control group will watch a series of animated / TV shows suitable for the sample age, again for 30 minutes a day, 5 days a week, for 8 weeks. The videos will be provided by the experimenter and participants will watch them on their personal computer. At the end of each videos, participants will answer a series of multiple-choice questions aimed at evaluating the attention deployed to the content of the videos.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
NEPSY-II Neuropsychological Battery
Time Frame: baseline

Assessment of executive functions, language, memory and visuo-spatial skills

Subscales (all subscales range from 1 to 19 scalar scores):

  • Design fluency, raw score 0/70
  • Auditory attention, 0/30 and Response Set 0/36
  • Inhibition (denomination 0/80 - 0/360') (inhibition 0/80 - 480') (switching 0/80 - 480') REVERSE (higher raw scores indicate worse perfomance)
  • Animal sorting, 0/12
  • Word generation, 0/75
  • Memory for faces, 0/32
  • Word list interference (repetition 0/20; recall 0/40)
  • Imitating hand position, (0/24)
  • Visuo-motor precision (0/307; 0/360') REVERSE (higher raw scores indicate worse perfomance)
  • Manual motor sequences, 0/60
  • Affect recognition, 0/35
  • Design copying (general 0/21; motor 0/42; global 0/42; local 0/36; total specific 0/120)
  • Picture puzzles, 0/20
  • Geometric puzzles, 0/40
baseline
Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children Fourth Edition (WISC-IV)
Time Frame: baseline

Assessment of general intellectual ability. Indexes (higher T scores indicate better perfomance for all indexes)

  • Verbal Comprehension Index (40/160)
  • Fluid Reasoning Index (40/160)
  • Working Memory Index (40/160)
  • Processing Speed Index (40/160)
  • Full Scale IQ (40/160)
baseline
NEPSY-II Neuropsychological Battery (change)
Time Frame: within 1 week after intervention
Assessment of executive functions, language, memory and visuo-spatial skills
within 1 week after intervention
NEPSY-II Neuropsychological Battery (change)
Time Frame: 3 month after intervention
Assessment of executive functions, language, memory and visuo-spatial skills
3 month after intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) (parent compiled for 6-18 years old participants)
Time Frame: baseline

Questionnaire for the assessment of emotional and behavioural problems.

The CBCL 6-18 is aimed at assessing psychological adjustment and behavioral functioning of children, as rated by parents. This instrument provides a total score, an internalizing score and an externalizing score, together with 8 syndrome scale scores and 6 DSM-oriented scale scores. It contains 113 items. Raw scores of the Total Problems Scale range from 0 to 226. T scores (M = 50, SD = 10) are used to interpret the level of behavioral functioning. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

baseline
Youth Self Report (CBCL self-report version for 11-18 years old participants)
Time Frame: baseline

Questionnaire for the assessment of emotional and behavioural problems.

YSR 11-18 is direcly compiled by adolescents aged 11-18 years. It provides a total score, an internalizing score and an externalizing score, together with eight empirically based syndromes and DSM-oriented scales. It contains 112 items. Raw scores of the Total Problems Scale range from 0 to 224. T scores (M = 50, SD = 10) are used to interpret the level of behavioral functioning. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

baseline
The Children's Quality of Life (TACQOL)
Time Frame: baseline

Questionnaire for the assessment of health-related quality of life.

Scales (higher raw scores indicate higher quality of life)

  • Body (physical functioning) 0/32
  • Motor functioning 0/32
  • Autonomy 0/32
  • Social functioning 0/32
  • Cognition 0/32
  • Emotions (positive) 0/16
  • Emotions (negative) 0/16
baseline
Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF-2) (parent compiled for 5-10 years old participants; self-report version for 11-18 years old participants)
Time Frame: baseline

Questionnaire for the assessesment of executive function and self-regulation competence.

The BRIEF (parent version) questionnaire is aimed at assessing executive functioning at home and school and contains 63 items. Raw scores of the global scale range from 63 to 189; T scores (M = 50, SD = 10). The self-report version contains 55 items. Raw scores of the global scale range from 55 to 165; T scores (M = 50, SD = 10). Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

Subscale and Indexes

  • Inhibit
  • Shift
  • Self-Monitor
  • Emotional Control
  • Initiate
  • Working Memory
  • Plan/Organize
  • Behavioral regulation Index
  • Emotion regulation Index
  • Cognitive regulation Index
  • Global Executive Index
baseline
Theta/beta ratio
Time Frame: baseline
Low theta/beta ratio is a cortical activity considered an index of poor attentional resources. Its recording will be conducted with a 32-channels EEG system at rest (4 minutes: 2 min eyes open and 2 min eyes closed).
baseline
Child Behavior Checklist CBCL (change)
Time Frame: within 1 week after intervention

Questionnaire for the assessment of emotional and behavioural problems

The CBCL 6-18 is aimed at assessing psychological adjustment and behavioral functioning of children, as rated by parents. This instrument provides a total score, an internalizing score and an externalizing score, together with 8 syndrome scale scores and 6 DSM-oriented scale scores. It contains 113 items. Raw scores of the Total Problems Scale range from 0 to 226. T scores (M = 50, SD = 10) are used to interpret the level of behavioral functioning. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

within 1 week after intervention
Youth Self Report (CBCL self-report version for 11-18 years old participants)
Time Frame: within 1 week after intervention

Questionnaire for the assessment of emotional and behavioural problems.

YSR 11-18 is direcly compiled by adolescents aged 11-18 years. It provides a total score, an internalizing score and an externalizing score, together with eight empirically based syndromes and DSM-oriented scales. It contains 112 items. Raw scores of the Total Problems Scale range from 0 to 224. T scores (M = 50, SD = 10) are used to interpret the level of behavioral functioning. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

within 1 week after intervention
The Children's Quality of Life TACQOL (change)
Time Frame: within 1 week after intervention

Questionnaire for the assessment of health-related quality of life. Scales (higher raw scores indicate higher quality of life)

  • Body (physical functioning) 0/32
  • Motor functioning 0/32
  • Autonomy 0/32
  • Social functioning 0/32
  • Cognition 0/32
  • Emotions (positive) 0/16
  • Emotions (negative) 0/16
within 1 week after intervention
Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF-2) (change)
Time Frame: within 1 week after intervention

Questionnaire for the assessesment of executive function and self-regulation competence.

The BRIEF (parent version) questionnaire is aimed at assessing executive functioning at home and school and contains 63 items. Raw scores of the global scale range from 63 to 189; T scores (M = 50, SD = 10). The self-report version contains 55 items. Raw scores of the global scale range from 55 to 165; T scores (M = 50, SD = 10). Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

Subscale and Indexes

  • Inhibit
  • Shift
  • Self-Monitor
  • Emotional Control
  • Initiate
  • Working Memory
  • Plan/Organize
  • Behavioral regulation Index
  • Emotion regulation Index
  • Cognitive regulation Index
  • Global Executive Index
within 1 week after intervention
Theta/beta ratio (change)
Time Frame: within 1 week after intervention
Low theta/beta ratio is a cortical activity considered an index of poor attentional resources. Its recording will be conducted with a 32-channels EEG system at rest (4 minutes: 2 min eyes open and 2 min eyes closed).
within 1 week after intervention
Ad-hoc compliance to treatment questionnaire
Time Frame: within 1 week after intervention

A 5 items of a 5-point Likert questionnaire created ad-hoc for the assessment of the compliance to the treatment.

Higher scores indicare better compliance (except for item 4)

within 1 week after intervention
Child Behavior Checklist CBCL (change)
Time Frame: 3 months after intervention

Questionnaire for the assessment of emotional and behavioural problems

The CBCL 6-18 is aimed at assessing psychological adjustment and behavioral functioning of children, as rated by parents. This instrument provides a total score, an internalizing score and an externalizing score, together with 8 syndrome scale scores and 6 DSM-oriented scale scores. It contains 113 items. Raw scores of the Total Problems Scale range from 0 to 226. T scores (M = 50, SD = 10) are used to interpret the level of behavioral functioning. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

3 months after intervention
Youth Self Report (CBCL self-report version for 11-18 years old participants)
Time Frame: 3 month after intervention

Questionnaire for the assessment of emotional and behavioural problems.

YSR 11-18 is direcly compiled by adolescents aged 11-18 years. It provides a total score, an internalizing score and an externalizing score, together with eight empirically based syndromes and DSM-oriented scales. It contains 112 items. Raw scores of the Total Problems Scale range from 0 to 224. T scores (M = 50, SD = 10) are used to interpret the level of behavioral functioning. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

3 month after intervention
The Children's Quality of Life TACQOL (change)
Time Frame: 3 months after intervention

Questionnaire for the assessment of health-related quality of life.

Scales (higher raw scores indicate higher quality of life)

  • Body (physical functioning) 0/32
  • Motor functioning 0/32
  • Autonomy 0/32
  • Social functioning 0/32
  • Cognition 0/32
  • Emotions (positive) 0/16
  • Emotions (negative) 0/16
3 months after intervention
Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF-2) (change)
Time Frame: 3 month after intervention

Questionnaire for the assessesment of executive function and self-regulation competence.

The BRIEF (parent version) questionnaire is aimed at assessing executive functioning at home and school and contains 63 items. Raw scores of the global scale range from 63 to 189; T scores (M = 50, SD = 10). The self-report version contains 55 items. Raw scores of the global scale range from 55 to 165; T scores (M = 50, SD = 10). Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

Subscale and Indexes

  • Inhibit
  • Shift
  • Self-Monitor
  • Emotional Control
  • Initiate
  • Working Memory
  • Plan/Organize
  • Behavioral regulation Index
  • Emotion regulation Index
  • Cognitive regulation Index
  • Global Executive Index
3 month after intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Alessandra Bardoni, MD, PhD, Scientific Institute, IRCCS E. Medea

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

May 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

February 28, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 28, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 25, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

March 2, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 26, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 24, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Epilepsy

Clinical Trials on Home rehabilitation training

3
Subscribe