Comparison of Multi-point Pacing and Conventional CRT Through Non-invasive Hemodynamics Measurement and Global Longitudinal Strain Assessment (COMPACT-MPP)

March 6, 2020 updated by: Antonio Curcio, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Mater Domini, Catanzaro
Pilot, perspective, multi-center non-randomized study comparing Multi-point pacing and conventional CRT through non-invasive hemodynamics measurement and Global Longitudinal Strain assessment

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

52

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Napoli, Italy, 80100
        • AO Cardarelli
      • Napoli, Italy, 80100
        • AOU Federico II
    • CZ
      • Catanzaro, CZ, Italy, 88100
        • Azienda Ospedaliera Policlinico Mater Domini

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

- Patients with standard indications to CRT satisfying the study Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Recent or scheduled implantation of CRT-D system with quadripolar lead and MPP technology in patient with indications to CRT according to current guidelines

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients in Atrial Tachycardia (AT) or Atrial Fibrillation (AF) at the time of the enrollment or with persistent or long-standing persistent/chronic AF
  • NYHA IV patients
  • Right Bundle Branch Block

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
standard BIV
the following group describes the effects of the left ventricular stimulation involving a dipole of two electrodes located inside a suitable vessel branch of the coronary sinus (CS). Standard BIV pacing modality can be achieved by either a quadripolar electrode implanted in the CS, of which only two poles will be used for cardiac resynchronization therapy, or by a bipolar electrode equipped with just two electrodes. The latter describes the old technology, requiring a change into typology of generator which has to display an IS-1 connection (due to different distal terminal of the electrode itself), instead of the new one IS-4 connection that has been developed for quadripolar electrodes.
MPP BIV
Such modality of left ventricular stimulation requires a dynamic use of the four electrodes located in the proximal segment of the electrocatheter that allows the recruitment of a vast area of the left ventricle. It is limited by the presence of scars on left ventricle surface, or phrenic nerve inadvertent stimulation.
Implanted CRT-D devices settings will be programmed based on the best acute hemodynamic response assessed non-invasively

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acute improvement in cardiac function (1)
Time Frame: 24-48 hours after CRT-D implantation
change in dP/dtmax, expressed in mmHg/s, assessed through photoplethysmography. This assessment represents in a non-invasive fashion, the rise in pressure (P) developed inside left ventricle during contraction over time.
24-48 hours after CRT-D implantation
Acute improvement in cardiac function (2)
Time Frame: 24-48 hours after CRT-D implantation
change in global longitudinal strain, assessed through echocardiography. This assessment elucidates longitudinal shortening of the left ventricle as a percentage (change in length as a proportion to baseline length). GLS is derived from speckle tracking, and analyzed by post-processing of apical images of the left ventricle.
24-48 hours after CRT-D implantation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Delayed response (1)
Time Frame: 3 Months
change in GLS. Participants will investigate whether left ventricular remodeling upon "patient-tailored" biventricular stimulation will behave differentially according to type of stimulation; the total amount of CRT-responder patients will be therefore considered
3 Months
Delayed response (2)
Time Frame: 3 Months
change in NYHA class. Participants will check if functional status will change after optimized biventricular stimulation therapy and will provide clinical data on CRT responders.
3 Months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 21, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 30, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

February 27, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 12, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 5, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

March 6, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 10, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 178

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Clinical Trials on Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy device programming

3
Subscribe