Masotherapy With Neural Tension in Patients With Parkinson's Disease

October 22, 2020 updated by: Alexander Achalandabaso, University of Jaen

Effectiveness of Adding Neural Tension to Masotherapy in Patients With Parkinson's Disease

The objective of this study is to assess if the masotherapy with neural tension is more effective than non-neural tension to improve and reduce tremor in patients with Parkinson's disease. The project will be carried out in clinics, where both data collection, assessments and scales will be carried out, as well as the plan and intervention in which the neural tension massage therapy of the radial nerve will be applied to the first intervention group; and massage therapy without neural tension in the second group.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In this study the investigators are going to compare the effectiveness of two treatments (masotherapy with neural tension and masotherapy with non-neural tension) in patients with Parkinson disease based on the improved of pain, tremor, functional and life quality.

The investigators are going to divide the number of volunteers in two groups. The first group is going to be treated during 8 weeks with conventional (non-neural tension) masotherapy in the upper limb, the other group is going to be treated with radial neural tension masotherapy during 8 weeks also. To apply the neural tension, the investigators position the patient's upper limb lowering the scapula, elbow extended, internal rotation glenohumeral, forearm pronation, bend and cubital deviation of the wrist, fingers bended and thumb adduction, and finally glenohumeral abduction.

To compare the results between the different groups, the investigators are going to value the patients 4 times, the first one before the beginning of the treatment, the second one and the end of the treatment, the third one after one month completing the treatment, and the last one after three months completing the treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

52

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Madrid, Spain
        • Physiotherapy clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • People diagnosed with Parkinson disease in mild or moderate degree.
  • Age between 50-80 years old.
  • People who can answer the questionnaires without held.
  • People who commit to attend the treatment assigned in the study.
  • People with tremor that limit his/her functionality or cause discomfort.
  • People who is not treated the upper limb

Exclusion Criteria:

  • People with mental disease.
  • People who do not sign the informed consent.
  • People who present comorbidities that can affect the final result of the study.
  • People whose medication is modified through the study.
  • People who take medication whose secundary effect is the tremor appearance.
  • People who is participating in other research studies.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Masotherapy with neural tension
The investigators are going to massage the patient´s upper limb applying a radial nerve neural tension. In order to the upper limb should be positioned lowering the scapula, elbow extended, internal rotation glenohumeral, forearm pronation, bend and cubital deviation of the wrist, fingers bended and thumb adduction, and finally glenohumeral abduction.
To compare the effectiveness of masotherapy with neural tension and masotherapy with non-neural tension
Other Names:
  • Neurodynamic
Active Comparator: Masotherapy with non-neural tension
The investigators are going to practice a conventional upper limb massage
To compare the effectiveness of masotherapy with neural tension and masotherapy with non-neural tension
Other Names:
  • Neurodynamic

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in the tremor
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 month after intervention
Using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Ratin Scale (UPDRS). Each item is scored 0-4 (0= normal; 10= severe affectation) yielding a total between 0 and 159.
Baseline and 1 month after intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in the health-related quality of life: Parkinson Disease Quality of Questionnaire (PDQ-39)
Time Frame: Baseline 8 weeks and 1 month after intervention
Using the Parkinson Disease Quality of Questionnaire (PDQ-39). Each item is scored 0-4 (0= better life quality; 4= bad life quality) yielding a total between 0 and 156.
Baseline 8 weeks and 1 month after intervention
Changes in the strength
Time Frame: Baseline 8 weeks and 1 month after intervention
Using the MicroFet 2 Hoggan
Baseline 8 weeks and 1 month after intervention
Changes in the manual dexterity
Time Frame: Baseline 8 weeks and 1 month after intervention
Using the Coin Rotation Task (CRT)
Baseline 8 weeks and 1 month after intervention
Changes in the pain: Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Baseline 8 weeks and 1 month after intervention
Using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Each item is scored 0-10 (0= no pain; 10= the major pain that the patient can imagine) yielding a total between 0 and 10.
Baseline 8 weeks and 1 month after intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 20, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 16, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

April 13, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 8, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

March 11, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 23, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 22, 2020

Last Verified

October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson Disease

Clinical Trials on Masotherapy with neural tension and masotherapy with non-neural tension

3
Subscribe