How Gas-Filled Intragastric Balloons or Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty Affect Hunger, Hunger Hormones, and Gastric Emptying Compared to Meal Replacements

April 21, 2022 updated by: University of Colorado, Denver

The Effect of a Gas-filled Intragastric Balloon or Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty for Weight Loss Compared With a Meal Replacement Weight Loss Program on Gastric Emptying, Hormonal Adaptation to Weight Loss, and Hunger

The disease obesity continues to be a major health issue in the US with over one third of the population having a mass index >30 kg/m2. Obesity is associated with serious cardiometabolic complications including diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia and myocardial infarction. Rates of successful obesity treatment with weight loss and weight maintenance remain low. Several endoscopic bariatric therapies and procedures have been approved for use in the United States, including three intragastric balloon systems (2 fluid-filled and one gas-filled) and endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG), both of which have lower risks than bariatric surgery and do not alter gastrointestinal anatomy. Weight loss with all intragastric balloons and ESG is higher than lifestyle therapy or weight loss medications, but less than bariatric surgery. Unlike weight loss medications where weight loss from the medication is regained within 6-8 months after therapy ends, weight loss maintenance with intragastric balloons remains high with 66-88.5% of the weight loss maintained 6 months after device removal. Data suggests that space occupying devices with a volume of 400 ml or more in the stomach increase feelings of fullness and result in weight loss, but this does not explain the prolonged effect of weight loss maintenance after balloon removal. Although few studies have investigated the mechanism of action of fluid-filled balloons and one study with 4 patients undergoing ESG on weight loss, these data suggest that gastric emptying as well as space occupation contribute to weight loss. However, no studies have investigated the mechanisms of action of gas filled intragastric balloons on weight loss.

Understanding the mechanisms responsible for weight loss with the gas filled intragastric balloon system and ESG as well as any weight loss independent effects on blood glucose control would lay the groundwork for studies evaluating predictors of response to improve patient selection as well as studies understanding the mechanisms behind weight loss maintenance and developing strategies to prolong weight loss maintenance.

Therefore, the purpose of this pilot study is to determine the effects 10% total body weight loss (%TBWL) in patients with obesity treated with the intragastric balloon (GF- IGB) system or ESG compared to patients with obesity treated with a meal replacement program (MRP) on 1) gastric emptying, 2) hormonal adaptation to weight loss and 3) hunger.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Obesity is a chronic disease, which is associated with and contributes to multiple medical co- morbidities including but not limited to cardiovascular disease, diabetes, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, and many different cancers. Obesity is also associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality. Despite these known risks, treatment remains limited. This has contributed to the increase in the prevalence of obesity with 42.4%% of adults in the US adults having a body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m2.

Endoscopic bariatric therapies are a new class of treatment for obesity, which have demonstrated more weight loss than lifestyle therapy alone and fewer complications than bariatric surgery with less weight loss than bariatric surgery. Four endoscopic devices are currently approved by the FDA for the treatment of obesity, including two intragastric balloons (IGB). One of the balloons systems are fluid filled (FF-IGB) and one is gas filled (GF-IGB). Although the GF-IGB system is swallowed, all the balloon systems require an endoscopist for endoscopic removal. In clinical registry series, these balloons demonstrate similar weight loss at 6 months. Unlike weight loss medications, weight loss maintenance is prolonged after IGB removal, which was demonstrated meta-analysis of studies and case series outside of the US of the single FF-IGB demonstrated weight loss maintenance after balloon removal 9 and in the US pivotal trials. While the occupancy of space in the stomach by IGB is known to induce satiation and satiety, this mechanism is only present with the IGB in place. Therefore, the prolonged effects of weight loss maintenance after IGB removal suggest other mechanisms contributing to weight loss with IGB treatment beyond space occupation. ESG is completed endoscopically with a device that has FDA 510k clearance for tissue apposition in the GI tract. Weight loss with ESG in a recent meta-analysis in 1772 patients demonstrated 16.5% TBWL at 12 months and 17.2% TBWL at 18-245 months. Understanding the mechanisms contributing to weight loss with the GF-IGB system and ESG will lay the groundwork for future studies to enhance the effect of IGBs and ESG on initial weight loss, patient selection, and weight loss maintenance; increasing benefits to patients treated with IGBs or ESG.

FF-IGB are known to delay gastric emptying. This is consistent with practice patterns as patients reliably have food left in their stomachs after an overnight fast requiring multiple days of liquid diet prior to endoscopic removal to avoid aspiration. In one study, the FF-IGB delayed gastric emptying compared to both baseline and a control group and the change in gastric emptying was associated with weight loss. Gastric emptying has been studied in only 4 patients before and after ESG. In these 4 patients, there was a 90-minute increase to the time for 50% of emptying of solid foods, however the limited number of patients in that study reduce overall certainty of the effect of ESG on gastric emptying. No studies have investigated the effects of the GF-IGB on gastric emptying. This protocol will clarify the effects of the GF-IGB and ESG on gastric emptying compared with a control group matched on weight loss. This will elucidate the weight loss independent effects of the devices since patients will be studied at baseline and 10% total body weight loss.

Another possible mechanism by which IGBs and ESG may induce weight loss and weight loss maintenance is through alterations in gut hormones. Ghrelin is a hormone secreted by X/A like cells, which are predominantly in the fundus of the stomach. Ghrelin concentrations fluctuate with eating, increasing pre-meals and decreasing in response to food in the stomach. Moreover, infusion of ghrelin stimulates eating in humans and is the only known hormone secreted from the GI tract to stimulate hunger. Weight loss with lifestyle therapy alone has been shown to increase fasting and meal test "active" or acyl-ghrelin concentrations, which correlated with increased hunger on visual analogue scale (VAS) testing. Acyl-Ghrelin concentrations were still elevated at one year after weight loss despite weight regain of almost 50%, which suggests that acyl-ghrelin plays and important role in weight regain. Studies investigating ghrelin concentrations in the setting of FF-IGBs have been mixed, demonstrating decreased fasting plasma total ghrelin concentrations, no change in fasting or meal test ghrelin concentrations in FF-IGB or control groups, increased fasting plasma ghrelin compared to a control group at months 1 and 6 with decreased ghrelin in the active arm compared to the control arm after removal and increased ghrelin concentrations in a single arm. However, these studies measured total ghrelin not acyl ghrelin. This limits the reliability of the data especially since no change in ghrelin concentrations were seen in control patients with weight loss in which an increase in acyl- ghrelin is expected. Moreover, all the studies were with FF-IGB and none were in the GF-IGB system.

Balloon type may have an effect on acyl-ghrelin concentrations, as GF-IGB tend to float in the fundus and body of the stomach, which may affect the IGB's ability to suppress acyl-ghrelin secretion. In one of the aforementioned studies a post-hoc analysis demonstrated that the small number of patients whose FF-IGBs localized to the fundus had greater suppression of ghrelin.

Fasting ghrelin has been evaluated in one study with 12 patients pre and post ESG. Fasting ghrelin concentrations did not increase with weight loss, but meal testing was not performed.

Therefore, this protocol will determine the effects of 10% TBWL from either GF-IGB system treatment or ESG treatment compared to lifestyle and meal replacement therapy on acyl-ghrelin concentrations, the active form of ghrelin, which stimulates hunger, and the sensation of hunger with the VAS. This will allow for the detection of effects that are specific to either procedure and independent of weight loss.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

75

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

22 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male and female participants aged 22-65
  • Weight Stable (<5% weight change in the last 3 months)
  • Initiating treatment with GF-IGB, ESG, or medically supervised MRP
  • BMI of 30-40

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of liver disease
  • History of uncontrolled thyroid disease
  • History of anemia
  • History of diabetes
  • History of eating disorder
  • History of uncontrolled depression defined as a score of ≥ 10 on PHQ-9 (Patient Health Questionnaire-9)
  • Use of weight loss medications in the past 3 months
  • History of gastroparesis
  • History of bariatric surgery
  • History to allergy or intolerance to any component of the meal used in the gastric emptying study or mixed meal test
  • Women who are pregnant or lactating
  • Currently incarcerated
  • Non English speaking
  • Decisionally challenged adults

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: GF-IGB: Obalon Balloon
Obalon balloons are gas-filled balloons used for weight loss by taking up more space in the stomach. There are three separate balloons that are placed. They are inflated once the capsules containing the balloons are swallowed. The second balloon is swallowed two weeks after the first balloon, and the third balloon is swallowed four to eight weeks after the second balloon. All three balloons are removed six months after the first balloon is placed.
Device: GF-IGB: Obalon Balloon
The balloon, which is attached to a thin catheter, is swallowed by the patient in a standing position. Once the two-step verification of balloon passage into the stomach by both fluoroscopy and pressure reading, the balloon is inflated to a volume of 250 ml with a nitrogen-mix gas, additional imaging of the inflated balloon is obtained, the catheter is ejected from the balloon, and the catheter is pulled out through the patient's mouth. The process is repeated at week 2 for the second balloon and between weeks 4-8 for the third balloon. All patients are given an individualized calorie prescription by a registered dietitian for a goal of up to 2 pounds of weight loss per week. The balloons are removed endoscopically 6 months after placement of the first balloon. Patients also attend monthly virtual individual diet coaching and monthly virtual group behavior coaching sessions both delivered by a registered dietitian for twelve months focused on long-term behavior change.
Active Comparator: Medically Supervised Meal Replacement Program: My New Weigh
Meal Replacements are used for weight loss in order to achieve a very low-calorie diet that is nutritionally balanced. Four to five meal replacements are consumed per day. If only four meal replacements are consumed per day, three servings of vegetables and two servings of fruit are consumed as well. This program lasts for about five months or twenty weeks.
Dietary supplement: Medically Supervised Meal Replacement Program: My New Weigh
Patients are given an individualized calorie prescription by a registered dietitian for a goal of 2 pounds weight loss per week. Patients are seen in a group-based program once a week focused on long-term behavior change and use meal replacements for a nutritionally balanced very low-calorie diet for 20 weeks. 4-5 meal replacements are consumed per day. If only 4 meal replacements are consumed, individuals eat 3 servings of vegetables and 2 servings of fruit per day as well.
Active Comparator: Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty: ESG
Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) is a weight loss procedure that uses an endoscopic suturing device known as Overstitch to reduce the size of the stomach. This decreases the amount of food one can consume, which leads to the consumption of fewer calories throughout the day, resulting in weight loss.
Procedure: Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty: (ESG)
Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty is a weight loss procedure that uses an FDA 510K cleared endoscopic suturing device known as Overstitch to reduce the size of the gastric body. The procedure is completed with an endoscope. It is inserted through the mouth, down the esophagus, and into the stomach. Sutures with 8-10 bites 1.5-2 cm apart in a U-shape pattern are placed starting distally 6 cm proximal to the pylorus. Additional sutures are placed moving proximally up to 2 cm distal to the gastroesophageal junction. An additional row of sutures is then placed again in the distal to proximal stomach to complete the gastroplasty. All patients are given an individualized calorie prescription by a registered dietitian for a goal of up to 2 pounds of weight loss per week. Patients also attend monthly virtual individual diet coaching and monthly virtual group behavior coaching sessions both delivered by a registered dietitian for twelve months focused on long-term behavior change.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Weight Loss
Time Frame: 6 months
10%TBWL by GI-IGB, ESG, or Medically Supervised MRP
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gastric emptying measured by technetium 99 gastric emptying study
Time Frame: 6 months
The investigators hypothesize that treatment with GF-IGB and ESG will result in greater gastric retention of contents at 2 hours compared with patients who are treated with MRP.
6 months
Acyl-Ghrelin measured at multiple times points during a mixed meal test (MMT)
Time Frame: 6 months
The investigators hypothesize that weight loss induced increase in active ghrelin concentrations seen during a mixed meal tolerance test will be lower in patients treated with GF- IGB and ESG compared with patients treated with MRP.
6 months
Glucose measured at multiple times points during a mixed meal test (MMT)
Time Frame: 6 months
There will be no difference in glucose concentrations in patients treated with GF-IGB and ESG compared with treatments treated with MRP.
6 months
Insulin measured at multiple times points during a mixed meal test (MMT)
Time Frame: 6 months
There will be no difference in insulin concentrations in patients treated with GF-IGB and ESG compared with treatments treated with MRP.
6 months
Level of hunger measured using a visual analog scale (Hunger VAS)
Time Frame: 6 months
The investigators hypothesize that hunger will increase before and during a MMT after weight loss with MRP but will not change from baseline after weight loss with GF-IGB and ESG treatment. Scales will range from 0-100, with 100 being more hungry (worse outcome) and 0 being less hungry (better outcome).
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

University of Colorado, Denver

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Shelby Sullivan, MD, University of Colorado, Denver

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 2, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 2, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 2, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 6, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 9, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 25, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 21, 2022

Last Verified

April 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 19-0278

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obesity

Clinical Trials on GF-IGB: Obalon Balloon

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Togo

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe