- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04337541
Reduction in COVID-19 Infection Using Surgical Facial Masks Outside the Healthcare System
In the current COVID-19 pandemic with coronavirus, SARS-COV2, the Danish Health Authorities recommend using facial masks in the health care system when handling patients presumed or proven to be infected with the virus. However, the use of facial masks outside the health care system is not recommended by the Danish Health Authorities. Here, Health Authorities in other countries have different recommendations for the use of facial masks.
Challenges when using facial masks outside the health care system include wearing the mask consistently, an efficacy of the mask of app. 8 hours necessitating a change of mask throughout the day, and that it is not sufficiently tight enough to safely keep the virus out. Moreover, the eyes (mucous membrane) remain exposed. Compliance could also be another challenge.
SARS-COV2 is assumed to primarily enter the body via the mouth through respiratory droplets - or possibly through inhalation of aerosol containing the virus. From the mouth the virus is assumed to spread to the airways and the gastro-intestinal tract. SARS-COV2 is also known to be transmitted via physical contact, helped along by the fact that the virus can survive on surfaces for at least 72 hours. Touching such a contaminated surface can transfer the virus to the mouth via the hand - and thus lead to infection of the person.
Facial masks are expected to protect against viral infection in two ways;
- By reducing the risk of getting the virus in via the mouth or nose via respiratory droplets or aerosol
- By reducing the transfer from virus-contaminated hands to the mouth or nose
Hypothesis The use of surgical facial masks outside the hospital will reduce the frequency of COVID-19 infection.
All participants will follow authority recommendations and be randomized to either wear facial masks or not. The participants will be screened for antibodies at study start and study end. They will perform swab-test if they experience symptoms during the study as well as the end of study.
Study Overview
Detailed Description
Background In the current COVID-19 pandemic with coronavirus, SARS-COV2, the Danish Health Authorities recommend using facial masks in the health care sector when handling patients presumed or proven to be infected with the virus. However, the use of facial masks outside the healthcare system is not recommended by the Danish Health Authorities. Challenges when using facial masks outside the health care system include wearing the mask consistently, an efficacy of the mask of app. 8 hours necessitating a change of mask throughout the day, and that it is not sufficiently tight enough to safely keep the virus out. Moreover, the eyes (mucous membrane) remain exposed. Compliance could also be another challenge. Health Authorities in other countries have different recommendations for the use of facial masks and the authors of the Lancet study concluded; "Universal use of face masks could be considered if supplies permit. In parallel, urgent research on the duration of protection of face masks, the measures to prolong life of disposable masks, and the invention on reusable masks should be encouraged."
SARS-COV2 is assumed to primarily enter the body via the mouth through respiratory droplets or possibly through inhalation of aerosol containing the virus. From the mouth the virus is assumed to spread to the airways and the gastro-intestinal tract. SARS-COV2 is also known to be transmitted via physical contact, helped along by the fact that the virus can survive on surfaces for at least 72 hours. Touching such a contaminated surface can transfer the virus to the mouth via the hand - and thus lead to infection of the person. A study with 26 medical students showed that they touched their face on average 23 times per hour, and that in 44 % of the incidents they touched their mucous membranes3. A Japanese questionnaire study showed that facial masks reduced the risk for school children for getting influenza by 15 %4. N95 mask and surgical facial masks are presumed to have the same effect for healthcare personnel when providing protecting from infection with influenza.
Facial masks are assumed to protect against viral infection in two ways;
- By reducing the risk of getting the virus via mouth or nose through the air via respiratory droplets or aerosol
- By reducing the transfer from virus-contaminated hands to the mouth or nose
About 10 % of the Danish population is estimated to get COVID-19 during the present pandemic-wave; this corresponds to 600,000 Danes. Later COVID-19 waves are expected to occur. The epidemic in Denmark is expected to be at the highest point in medio April. In April and May it be estimated that >2 % of the population will be infected per month.
Hypothesis The use of surgical facial masks outside the hospital will reduce the frequency of COVID-19 infection.
Method The participants recruited are people working outside of their home, who have not previously been infected with COVID-19 and who do not wear facial masks (e.g. healthcare personnel) when working. They will be randomized for
- Normal behavior according to the authority's recommendations or
- Normal behavior according to the authority's recommendations and use of facial masks
Participants will be instructed in using the facial mask consistently when outside their home (and at home when receiving visits from others. The instruction is given in writing and via an instruction video. The participants will be contacted once weekly to optimize compliance. It will be registered if the participants are diagnosed with COVID-19. Participants, who are not tested positive for COVID-19 in the study period will perform a self-test if having symptoms or when the study ends (instruction video).
Perspective The study can determine whether use of facial masks in the public is beneficial and if there is an effect this could have great impact on the current as well as any future, similar epidemics.
Interested participants can register through a link in the add to our research registration database RedCap. The participant will then receive written information and can then register. They will receive a COVID-19 screening test set and (+/-) facial masks ( 2 per day) for the first month. If the participant experience symptoms, he/she will register their symptoms in RedCap, test with a swab-test and send the swab-test to the study investigator for analyses. If negative, new test-sets are sent out - if positive, the participant will be referred to the hospital. This process continues until the participant is tested positive for COVID-19, the pandemic is considered finished by the Danish authorities or when the study ends on May 7 2020. At study end, all participants perform antibody screening and swab test, and send it to the study investigators.
Power calculation With an infection frequency of 2 % in the study period, an expected reduction of the risk to 1 % should be demonstratable with a power of 80 % and a p-value of 5 %, if including a total of 4,636 patients randomized 1:1. If the infection frequency is higher the power of the study will be higher. With an expected defection of 20 % a total of 6,000 participants will be included.
Authority approvals from The Danish National Committee On Health Research Ethics and The Data Protection Agency have been granted.
A detailed study analyses plan (SAP) will be finalized before data are analyzed.
Central registry data will be collected later when made available by national health authorities.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Copenhagen, Denmark, 2100
- Rigshospitalet
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Older than 18 years of age and without symptoms associated with corona-virus (or previously tested positive for corona).
- Participant is outside their home more than 3 hours a day. E.g.for work or for other activities among other people.
- Do not normally wear a facial mask for daily work (e.g. healthcare personnel)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Previously tested positive for corona-virus
- Wear facial mask for work
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
No Intervention: Normal recommendations, no mask
Normal behavior according to the authority's recommendations or
|
|
Experimental: Normal recommendations AND mask
Normal behavior according to the authority's recommendations AND use of facial masks
|
Participants will follow normal Authority recommendations AND wear mask outside their homes, or when receiving visits in their home.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
The primary endpoint is the difference in SARS-CoV-2 infection between the two groups after 1 months and is a combined endpoint consisting of primary outcome components 1, 2 and/or 3:
Time Frame: 1 month
|
Component 1 of primary endpoint: Positive oropharyngeal/nasal swab with SARS-CoV-2 (PCR) and/or
|
1 month
|
The primary endpoint is the difference in SARS-CoV-2 infection between the two groups after 1 months and is a combined endpoint consisting of primary outcome components 1, 2 and/or 3:
Time Frame: 1 month
|
Component 2 of primary endpoint: Antibody test; Development of positive SARS-CoV-2 antibody test (IgM and/or IgG) during the study period and/or
|
1 month
|
The primary endpoint is the difference in SARS-CoV-2 infection between the two groups after 1 months and is a combined endpoint consisting of primary outcome components 1, 2 and/or 3:
Time Frame: 1 month
|
Component 3 of primary endpoint: SARS-CoV-2 infection diagnosed in a hospital/health care facility
|
1 month
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Positive oropharyngeal/nasal swab (PCR);
Time Frame: 1 month
|
Para-influenza-virus type 1, Para-influenza-virus type 2, Human coronavirus 229E, Human coronavirus OC43, Human coronavirus NL63, Human coronavirus HKU1, Respiratory Syncytial-Virus A, Respiratory Syncytial-Virus B, Influenza A virus or Influenza B virus
|
1 month
|
Positive oropharyngeal/nasal swab (PCR);
Time Frame: 1 month
|
SAR-CoV-2, Para-influenza-virus type 1, Para-influenza-virus type 2, Human coronavirus 229E, Human coronavirus OC43, Human coronavirus NL63, Human coronavirus HKU1, Respiratory Syncytial-Virus A, Respiratory Syncytial-Virus B, Influenza A virus or Influenza B virus
|
1 month
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Difference between the two study groups
Time Frame: 1 month
|
Returned swabs
|
1 month
|
Discribtion of the face mask users psycological aspects of wearing face masks
Time Frame: 1 month
|
Psychological aspects of face mask wearing in the community
|
1 month
|
Costs associated with wearing vs not wearing face masks
Time Frame: 1 month
|
Cost-effectiveness analyses on the use of surgical face masks
|
1 month
|
Differences in the participants preferences
Time Frame: 1 month
|
Preference for self-conducted home swab vs. healthcare conducted swab at hospital or similar
|
1 month
|
Difference between the two study groups
Time Frame: 1 month
|
Symptoms of COVID-19
|
1 month
|
Difference between the two study groups with stratification between subgroups (age, gender, occupation, comorbidities)
Time Frame: 1 month
|
Self-assessed compliance with health authority guideline on hygiene
|
1 month
|
Discribtion of the face mask users willingness to wear face masks
Time Frame: 1 month
|
Willingness to wear face masks in the future
|
1 month
|
Healthcare diagnosed COVID-19 between study groups
Time Frame: 1 month
|
Healthcare diagnosed COVID-19 or identified SARS-CoV-2 infection as assessed by number of participants with antibodies against SARS-CoV-2, and/or positive maso/pharyngeal swab (PCR), mortality associated with COVID-19 and all cause mortality
|
1 month
|
Hospital based diagnostics of bacteria between the two study groups
Time Frame: 1 month
|
Presence of bacteria: Mycoplasma pneumonia, Haemophilus influenza and Legionella pneumophila (to be obtained from registries when made available)
|
1 month
|
Infection in the household between the two study groups
Time Frame: 1 month
|
Frequency of infected house-hold members between the two groups
|
1 month
|
Sick leave among participants beteeen the two study groups
Time Frame: 1 month
|
Frequency of sick leave between the two groups (to be obtained from registries when made available)
|
1 month
|
Predictors of primary outcome; age, gender, size of household, comorbidities, medications, social factors, occupation, mask compliance, compliance to general SARS-CoV-2 recommendations, hours outside home)
Time Frame: 1 month
|
Predictors of primary outcome or its components
|
1 month
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Henrik Ullum, Prof., DMSc, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
- Principal Investigator: Kasper Karmark Iversen, Prof., DMSc, Herlev Hospital
- Principal Investigator: Thomas Benfield, Prof., DMSc, Hvidovre University Hospital
- Principal Investigator: Christian Torp-Pedersen, Prof., DMSc, Nordsjællands Hospital
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Feng S, Shen C, Xia N, Song W, Fan M, Cowling BJ. Rational use of face masks in the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet Respir Med. 2020 May;8(5):434-436. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30134-X. Epub 2020 Mar 20. No abstract available.
- van Doremalen N, Bushmaker T, Morris DH, Holbrook MG, Gamble A, Williamson BN, Tamin A, Harcourt JL, Thornburg NJ, Gerber SI, Lloyd-Smith JO, de Wit E, Munster VJ. Aerosol and Surface Stability of SARS-CoV-2 as Compared with SARS-CoV-1. N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 16;382(16):1564-1567. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2004973. Epub 2020 Mar 17. No abstract available.
- Kwok YL, Gralton J, McLaws ML. Face touching: a frequent habit that has implications for hand hygiene. Am J Infect Control. 2015 Feb;43(2):112-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2014.10.015.
- Uchida M, Kaneko M, Hidaka Y, Yamamoto H, Honda T, Takeuchi S, Saito M, Kawa S. Effectiveness of vaccination and wearing masks on seasonal influenza in Matsumoto City, Japan, in the 2014/2015 season: An observational study among all elementary schoolchildren. Prev Med Rep. 2016 Dec 6;5:86-91. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.12.002. eCollection 2017 Mar.
- Gralton J, McLaws ML. Protecting healthcare workers from pandemic influenza: N95 or surgical masks? Crit Care Med. 2010 Feb;38(2):657-67. doi: 10.1097/ccm.0b013e3181b9e8b3.
- Bundgaard H, Bundgaard JS, Raaschou-Pedersen DET, von Buchwald C, Todsen T, Norsk JB, Pries-Heje MM, Vissing CR, Nielsen PB, Winslow UC, Fogh K, Hasselbalch R, Kristensen JH, Ringgaard A, Porsborg Andersen M, Goecke NB, Trebbien R, Skovgaard K, Benfield T, Ullum H, Torp-Pedersen C, Iversen K. Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers : A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Intern Med. 2021 Mar;174(3):335-343. doi: 10.7326/M20-6817. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
- Bundgaard H, Bundgaard JS, Raaschou-Pedersen DET, Mariager AF, Schytte N, von Buchwald C, Todsen T, Skovgaard K, Trebbien R, Andersen MP, Benfield T, Ullum H, Torp-Pedersen C, Iversen K. Face masks for the prevention of COVID-19 - Rationale and design of the randomised controlled trial DANMASK-19. Dan Med J. 2020 Aug 18;67(9):A05200363.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2020-04-02
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on COVID-19
-
University of Roma La SapienzaQueen Mary University of London; Università degli studi di Roma Foro Italico; Bios Prevention SrlCompletedPost Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 | Post COVID-19 Condition | Long-COVID | Chronic COVID-19 SyndromeItaly
-
Yang I. PachankisActive, not recruitingCOVID-19 Respiratory Infection | COVID-19 Stress Syndrome | COVID-19 Vaccine Adverse Reaction | COVID-19-Associated Thromboembolism | COVID-19 Post-Intensive Care Syndrome | COVID-19-Associated StrokeChina
-
Massachusetts General HospitalRecruitingPost Acute COVID-19 Syndrome | Long COVID | Post Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 | Long COVID-19United States
-
Indonesia UniversityRecruitingPost-COVID-19 Syndrome | Long COVID | Post COVID-19 Condition | Post-COVID Syndrome | Long COVID-19Indonesia
-
Erasmus Medical CenterDa Vinci Clinic; HGC RijswijkNot yet recruitingPost-COVID-19 Syndrome | Long COVID | Long Covid19 | Post COVID-19 Condition | Post-COVID Syndrome | Post COVID-19 Condition, Unspecified | Post-COVID ConditionNetherlands
-
Dr. Soetomo General HospitalIndonesia-MoH; Universitas Airlangga; Biotis Pharmaceuticals, IndonesiaRecruitingCOVID-19 Pandemic | COVID-19 Vaccines | COVID-19 Virus DiseaseIndonesia
-
University of Witten/HerdeckeInstitut für Rehabilitationsforschung NorderneyCompletedPost-COVID-19 Syndrome | Long-COVID-19 SyndromeGermany
-
Jonathann Kuo, MDActive, not recruitingSARS-CoV2 Infection | Post-COVID-19 Syndrome | Dysautonomia | Post Acute COVID-19 Syndrome | Long COVID | Long Covid19 | COVID-19 Recurrent | Post-Acute COVID-19 | Post-Acute COVID-19 Infection | Post Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 | Dysautonomia Like Disorder | Dysautonomia Orthostatic Hypotension Syndrome | Post... and other conditionsUnited States
-
University Hospital, Ioannina1st Division of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of IoanninaRecruitingCOVID-19 Pneumonia | COVID-19 Respiratory Infection | COVID-19 Pandemic | COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome | COVID-19-Associated Pneumonia | COVID 19 Associated Coagulopathy | COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease 2019) | COVID-19-Associated ThromboembolismGreece
Clinical Trials on Surgical facial mask
-
University of Split, School of MedicineRecruitingSkin Condition | Skin Inflammation | Facial Skin ChangesCroatia
-
Nantes University HospitalCompletedHypoxemic Acute Respiratory FailureFrance
-
Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université...Unknown
-
University of PadovaUnknownNeonatal ResuscitationVietnam
-
Università degli Studi di FerraraCompletedPostoperative Complications | Diaphragm InjuryItaly
-
Bozok UniversityCompletedCovid-19 | Pregnant | Mask | FetusTurkey
-
Riphah International UniversityCompletedHealthy VolunteersPakistan
-
McMaster UniversityHealth CanadaCompleted
-
Qilu Hospital of Shandong UniversityCompleted
-
Fundacion Clinica Valle del LiliCompleted