CoVid-19 - Infection and Antibody Formation in the Viennese Population

CoVid-19 - Infection and Antibody Formation in the Viennese Population - Data From the Vienna Health Study LEAD

Summary of the study

Study population:

A representative sample of the Viennese population stratified by age and gender (data from the Vienna Health Study LEAD)

Potential output and analysis:

  • Extent of age-specific infection and antibody formation
  • Cumulative incidence of infection
  • Rate of asymptomatic infection
  • Relationship with socioeconomics, lifestyle and risk factors (comorbidities)

Study design:

Prospective, longitudinal, stratified by age and gender

Duration of study:

Initial testing as soon as possible and repeat based on monitoring of the pandemic curve (probably after 2-3 months)

Information to be obtained from participants:

  • serum samples for information on SARS-CoV2 infection and antibody formation
  • data on clinical symptoms

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Both international (WHO; (1) and national are calling for increased testing for the SARS-CoV-2 virus; at present it is completely unclear how many people will actually become infected with the Covid-19 virus or have formed antibodies against it during the pandemic. The greatest uncertainty of all calculation models on hospitalisation rates, morbidity and mortality of the pandemic is the unknown number of unreported cases of citizens infected or having been infected with Covid-19.

Currently the direct detection of the SARS-CoV-2 virus from the mouth/nose/throat swab using PCR is established worldwide with high sensitivity and specificity. This direct method is expensive and not always available in sufficient quantities. Furthermore, the results are strongly influenced by the quality of the smear collection.

The detection of antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 virus is an alternative method for determining whether a person has been infected with SARS-CoV-2 and has developed an immune response to the virus. Recently several companies have been offering such kits for sale. According to national experts, these kits have not yet been sufficiently clinically validated, which is why valid data on their sensitivity and specificity are not yet available. However, on the validation of these tests are being worked hard all over the world, so that it can be assumed (the experts also agree on this) that data on the sensitivity and specificity of the antibody tests will be available in the foreseeable future.

Probably the only reasonable and feasible method of testing the actual rate of Covid-19 infection in a given population is to detect infection (either directly or indirectly by means of antibody testing) from a sample that is as representative as possible for this population.

The selected subjects of the LEAD study, the core project of the Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Lung Health at Otto Wagner Hospital (the hospital association is an official partner of the institute), represent an exemplary representative sample of the general population in Vienna (i.e. the sample corresponds to the Viennese population in terms of age, gender, smoking habits, place of residence, etc.). In the LEAD study, more than 11,000 subjects (aged 6-80) mainly from Vienna were subjected to a "Health examination survey" (2).

Due to the conditions described above, blood should be drawn from the subjects of the LEAD study at two points in time (as early as possible and after two to three months) and blood sera should be frozen to determine antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 and tested with a test of high sensitivity and specificity. According to the WHO this procedure (longitudinal cohort study with serial sampling of the same individuals (in the same geographic area) each time) is recommended in that provides the most comprehensive information on extent of infection.

By testing for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies twice in the subjects of the LEAD study (random sample), an accurate and representative estimate of the actual positive Covid-19 cases in the Viennese population and the rate of spread during the pandemic could be extrapolated for Vienna in the foreseeable future. Since more than 1,500 individual parameters were measured in the participants of the LEAD study, conclusions on socioeconomics, lifestyle factors and possible risk profiles (e.g. co-morbidity, smoking behaviour, etc.) can be drawn from those who tested positive (but also negative). In addition, a query regarding symptoms should be carried out at both dates in order to obtain information on the percentage of asymptomatic infections with SARS-CoV-2.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

12419

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Vienna, Austria, 1140
        • The LEAD Study Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 years to 85 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

General population cohort (The Austrian LEAD Study, NCT01727518), aged 6-85 years from Vienna, Austria

Description

Inclusion Criteria: all participants of the Austrian LEAD study will be invited (www.leadstudy.at) -

Exclusion Criteria: pregnancy, failure due to language

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
General Cohort
Population general cohort from the Austrian LEAD Study
Only a diagnostic test (serum blood and antibody measurement) is planned

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibody titres
Time Frame: 5 weeks
Antibody Titres IgG and IgM
5 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibody titres after 3 Months
Time Frame: 4 Months
Re-Calculation including incidence of the general population
4 Months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Otto C Burghuber, Prof.MD, Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Lung Health

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

April 27, 2020

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

May 27, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

May 27, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 13, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 13, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

April 15, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 4, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 3, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Virus Diseases

Clinical Trials on NO intervention planned due to the observational study design only a diagnostic testing

3
Subscribe