Safety and Efficacy of NP-120 (Ifenprodil) for the Treatment of Hospitalized Patient With Confirmed COVID-19 Disease

December 1, 2021 updated by: Algernon Pharmaceuticals

A Randomized Open Label Phase 2b/3 Study of the Safety and Efficacy of NP-120 (Ifenprodil) for the Treatment of Hospitalized Patient With Confirmed COVID-19 Disease

The purpose of this adaptive trial is to determine the clinical efficacy of Ifenprodil in the treatment of patients infected with COVID-19. This Protocol is largely based on the recommendations of the World Health Organization (WHO) R&D Blueprint Clinical Trials Expert Group COVID-19 Therapeutic Trial Synopsis, and associated Master Protocol.

The choice of the primary outcome measure will be determined by a pilot study of the first 150 subjects. Subject clinical status (on a 7-point ordinal scale) at day 15 in treatment versus the control group is the default primary endpoint.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

NP-120 (Ifenprodil) is an N-methyl-D-Aspartate (NDMA) inhibitor that is specific for the NR2B subunit of the NMDA Receptor. The NMDA receptor, and specifically the NR2B subunit, is involved in glutamate signaling, and is expressed on both neutrophils and T cells. In the case of neutrophils, activation of the NMDA receptor can (1) result in expression of CD11b which targets neutrophils via ICAM-1 to areas of inflammation, and (2) trigger the autocrine release of glutamate. In the case of T-cells, activation of T cells via glutamate can cause (1) T cell proliferation and, (2) the release of cytokines. The activation of T cells and cytokine release can be blocked in vitro by the addition of Ifenprodil. As such it could be a potent anti-inflammatory agent.

Ifenprodil was discovered by a genome wide RNAi assay to uncover gene targets associated with cytoprotective activity against highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza, specifically by preserving cell viability in vitro. When tested in a murine model of H5N1, the drug at clinically relevant doses: (1) improved survivability from 0% at day 6 to 40% day 14 post-infection, (2) the drug significantly reduced edema and lung injury score and (3) reduced infiltrating T cells, neutrophils and NK cells and attenuated the 'cytokine storm'. The mortality rate of H5N1 in humans is >50%, whereas the mortality rate of COVID-19 infected patients is < 5%, and both viruses cause acute lung injury and share similar pulmonary pathologies. NP-120 has also been shown to mediate anti-inflammatory responses and reduce pulmonary fibrosis in a murine model of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, a complication which can occur after a respiratory virus infection.

Based on the fact that H5N1 has a significantly higher mortality rate than COVID-19 but still shares similar lung pathologies, Algernon Pharmaceuticals believes Ifenprodil could reduce lung injury associated with COVID-19 infection, thereby improving lung function and accelerating patient recovery.

The purpose of this Phase 2b/3 trial is to determine the safety and efficacy of NP-120 in the treatment of COVID-19 infection.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

168

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Queensland
      • Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia, 4102
        • Princess Alexandra Hospital
    • Victoria
      • Parkville, Victoria, Australia, 3050
        • Royal Melbourne Hospital
      • Manila, Philippines
        • Philippine General Hospital
      • Manila, Philippines
        • Makati Medical Center
      • Quezon City, Philippines
        • Lung Center Of The Philippines
      • Bucharest, Romania, 021105
        • National Institute of Infectious Diseases
    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33155
        • Westchester Research Center
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60644
        • Affinity Health - Loretto Hospital
    • Missouri
      • Saint Joseph, Missouri, United States, 64507
        • Heartland Regional Medical Center
    • Ohio
      • Toledo, Ohio, United States, 43606
        • Promedica Health: Toledo Hospital and BayPark Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male and female subjects aged ≥18 years of age
  2. Confirmed coronavirus infection

    1. Positive real-time fluorescence polymerase chain reaction of the patient's respiratory or blood specimens for COVID-19 nucleic acid
    2. Viral gene sequences in respiratory or blood specimens that are highly homologous to COVID-19
    3. Any other diagnostic test accepted by local regulatory authorities
  3. Must be hospitalized and requiring supplemental oxygen, or on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices (Score of 4 or 5 on WHO Ordinal Clinical Scale)
  4. Female subjects of childbearing potential who are sexually active with a non-sterilized male partner must use at least 1 highly effective method of contraception (e.g. oral contraceptives, intrauterine device, diaphragm plus spermicide) from the time of screening and must agree to continue using such precautions for 90 days after the final dose of study drug(s)
  5. Non-sterilized males who are sexually active with a female partner of childbearing potential must use condom plus spermicide from day 1 through 90 days after receipt of the last dose of study drug(s)
  6. Subjects (or reasonable legal designate) must have the capacity to understand, sign and date a written, informed consent form and any required authorization prior to initiation of any study procedures

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with vasodilatory shock, orthostatic hypotension, hypotension, or tachycardia at screening/baseline
  2. Patients experiencing cerebral hemorrhage or cerebral infarction at baseline
  3. ALT/AST > 5 times the upper limit of normal; Child-Pugh Score 10 to 15
  4. Stage 4 severe chronic kidney disease or requiring dialysis (i.e. eGFR < 30)
  5. Patients on mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)
  6. Patients taking droxidopa
  7. Pregnant and lactating women and those planning to get pregnant
  8. Known or suspected allergy to the trial drug or the relevant drugs given in the trial
  9. Presence of other disease that may interfere with testing procedures or in the judgement of the Investigator may interfere with trial participation or may put the patient at risk when participating in this trial
  10. Know inability of patient to comply with the protocol for the duration of the study
  11. Involvement in a clinical research study within 4 weeks prior to screening and/or prior enrollment in the study or plan to participate in another interventional clinical trial during the study period. Participation in observational registry studies is permitted.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Treatment Arm A
NP-120 (Ifenprodil) 20 mg TID + Standard of Care
Ifenprodil, 20 mg TID Ifenprodil, 40 mg TID
No Intervention: Control Arm
Standard of Care only
Experimental: Treatment Arm B
NP-120 (Ifenprodil) 40 mg TID + Standard of Care
Ifenprodil, 20 mg TID Ifenprodil, 40 mg TID

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Clinical Status (on the WHO 7-point Ordinal Scale) at Day 15 in IP Versus SOC Control Group Patients:
Time Frame: Day 15
  1. Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities
  2. Not hospitalized, limitation on activities
  3. Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen
  4. Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen
  5. Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices
  6. Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO
  7. Death
Day 15

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Status on an Ordinal Scale Assessed Daily While Hospitalized and on Days 15 and 28 in IP Versus Control Group Patients
Time Frame: Days 1 through 28

WHO status of subjects at timepoints from baseline to day 28

  1. Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities
  2. Not hospitalized, limitation on activities
  3. Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen
  4. Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen
  5. Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices
  6. Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO
  7. Death
Days 1 through 28
NEWS Assessed Days 3, 5, 8 ,11 Daily While Hospitalized and on Days 15 and 29 in IP Versus Control Group Patients
Time Frame: Days 3, 5, 8, 11, 25, 29

National Early Warning Score assessed between baseline and Day 29 on subjects in 20, 40 mg TID NP-120 arms versus control group

The National Early Warning Score (NEWS) scale is a composite of 7 physiological parameters: Respiration Rate (per minute),Oxygen Saturations (%), Any Supplemental Oxygen, Temperature (°C), Systolic BP (mmHg), Heart Rate (per minute), Level of Consciousness. The aggregate results from all 7 physiological parameters are used to obtain the NEW Score., ranging from 0 - 20. Higher values reflect a worse outcome.

Days 3, 5, 8, 11, 25, 29
Rate of Mechanical Ventilation in IP Versus Control Group Patients
Time Frame: Up to Day 28
Rate of mechanical ventilation in 20 and 40 mg TID NP-120 versus control group
Up to Day 28
Duration of Mechanical Ventilation (if Applicable) in IP Versus Control Group Patients
Time Frame: Up to day 28
Duration of mechanical ventilation in 20 and 40 mg TID subjects versus control who experience mechanical ventilation
Up to day 28
Duration of Supplemental Oxygen in IP Versus Control Group Patients
Time Frame: Up to Day 29
Duration in patients only receiving supplemental oxygen in IP versus control group up to Day 29
Up to Day 29
Time to Return to Room Pressure (SpO2 > 94%) on Room Air
Time Frame: Up to Day 29

Time to return to room pressure (SpO2 > 94%) on room air in patients in 20, 40 mg TID NP-120 groups versus control group with 94% blood oxygen levels at enrolment

Time-to-event endpoints with competing risk were analysed for each dosing group using the Cumulative Incidence Function-CIF (KM) graphical display. Data represents the time (in Days) it took for all participants in the group to return to room pressure air (e.g. the time when the CIF curve hit 100%).

Up to Day 29
Duration in ICU (if Applicable) in IP Versus Control Group Patients
Time Frame: Up to Day 29
Duration of subject in ICU in 20 and 40 TID mg groups versus control group patients
Up to Day 29
Rate of Mortality in IP Versus Control Group Patients
Time Frame: Up to Day 29
Rate of Overall Mortality in 20, 40 mg TID groups versus control group
Up to Day 29
Duration of Hospitalization in IP Versus Control Group Patients
Time Frame: Day 15, 28
Day 15, 28
Time to Discharge in IP Versus Control Group Patients
Time Frame: Day 15, 28
Day 15, 28
Effect on the Rate of Change of Partial Pressure of Oxygen (PaO2) and PaO2/FiO2 Ratio Taken at Baseline and Measured Once Daily up to 2 Weeks of Treatment in IP Versus Control Group Patients
Time Frame: Up to day 15, day 28
Up to day 15, day 28

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 5, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 24, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

January 26, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 8, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

May 11, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 3, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 1, 2021

Last Verified

December 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on COVID

Clinical Trials on NP-120 (Ifenprodil)

3
Subscribe