The Influence of Tissue Adhesive to Palatal Donor Site Healing.

May 27, 2020 updated by: Gencay Keceli, Hacettepe University

The Influence of Tissue Adhesive to Palatal Donor Site Healing. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

CTG was harvested from 21 patients in each group. Donor site was treated with either GS (control) or GS+CY (test). Palatal tissue thickness, graft dimensions, working time (WT) and primary bleeding time were recorded intraoperatively. Patients recorded the quantity of analgesics (QA) taken, presence of secondary bleeding (SB) and pain perception (PP) daily for first postoperative week. Sensation loss (SL), color match (CM), epithelization level (EL) were evaluated at days 7, 14, 21 and 28.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

42

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ankara, Turkey, 06100
        • Hacettepe University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age ≥18;
  • PPS indication that needs CTG in anterior mandible;
  • stable periodontium after phase I therapy;
  • full-mouth plaque and bleeding scores <15%

Exclusion Criteria:

  • previous palatal harvesting history;
  • unstable endodontic conditions;
  • tooth mobility at surgical site;
  • systemic disease;
  • pregnancy;
  • use of medications with potential adverse effects to periodontal tissues

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Gelatine Sponge
After local anesthesia (2% articaine HCl with epinephrine 1:100,000) administration, palatal thickness was measured by perpendicularly inserting a Michigan-O periodontal probe from the corners of the rectangular donor area and mean value was recorded as 'palatal tissue thickness (PTT)'. Epithelialized gingival graft was harvested with the method described by Zucchelli et al.19 After a rectangular shaped initial incision, graft with 1-1.5 mm thickness was harvested approximately 1.5 to 3 mm away from gingival margins of upper teeth. After harvesting, excess fatty tissues were removed and de-epithelialization was performed to obtain DGG. Donor site was closed either with GS (Spongostan®, Ethicon, Somerville, USA)
Donor site was closed either with GS (Spongostan®, Ethicon, Somerville, USA) (GS group)
Active Comparator: Gelatine sponge +Cyanoacrylate
After local anesthesia (2% articaine HCl with epinephrine 1:100,000) administration, palatal thickness was measured by perpendicularly inserting a Michigan-O periodontal probe from the corners of the rectangular donor area and mean value was recorded as 'palatal tissue thickness (PTT)'. Epithelialized gingival graft was harvested with the method described by Zucchelli et al.19 After a rectangular shaped initial incision, graft with 1-1.5 mm thickness was harvested approximately 1.5 to 3 mm away from gingival margins of upper teeth. After harvesting, excess fatty tissues were removed and de-epithelialization was performed to obtain DGG. Donor site was closed either with GS (Spongostan®, Ethicon, Somerville, USA) and GS covered with high viscosity CY (PeriAcryl®, Glustitch Inc., Delta, Canada) (GS+CY group)
Donor site was closed either with GS (Spongostan®, Ethicon, Somerville, USA) (GS group) and GS covered with high viscosity CY (PeriAcryl®, Glustitch Inc., Delta, Canada) (GS+CY group).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Donor site pain perception (PP)
Time Frame: first week
Patients score their daily donor site pain perception (PP) level by giving numbers from 0 to 10 according to the visual analog scale (VAS) (0: no pain, 1: minimal pain, 10: severe pain)
first week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary bleeding time (PBT)
Time Frame: during surgery
Immediately after harvesting, sterile gauze was compressed to the palatal wound for 2 minutes, blood wiped once in every 30 seconds until bleeding stops. The duration was recorded as primary bleeding time (PBT).
during surgery
Graft height (GH)
Time Frame: during surgery
Dimensions were measured with periodontal probe
during surgery
Graft width (GW)
Time Frame: during surgery
Dimensions were measured with periodontal probe
during surgery
Graft thickness (GT)
Time Frame: during surgery
Dimensions were measured with periodontal probe
during surgery
Working time (WT)
Time Frame: during surgery
Harvesting process was recorded
during surgery
Quantity of analgesics (QA)
Time Frame: first week
Patients recorded the quantity of analgesics (QA) taken
first week
Secondary bleeding (SB)
Time Frame: first week
Patients recorded presence/absence of secondary bleeding (SB) (yes or no).
first week
Sensation loss (SL)
Time Frame: first week, second week , third week, fourth week.
Sensation loss (SL) was scored as none, medium or severe
first week, second week , third week, fourth week.
Color match (CM)
Time Frame: first week, second week, third week, fourth week.
Color match (CM) with the adjacent tissue was determined by using a VAS scale (0: absence of harmony, 10: excellent harmony)
first week, second week, third week, fourth week.
Epithelization level (EL)
Time Frame: first week, second week, third week, fourth week.
Epithelization level (EL) was scored as none, partial or full epithelization by means of bubble formation after dripping hydrogen peroxide (3%) to the wound surface following surgery
first week, second week, third week, fourth week.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 21, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 21, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

May 27, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 29, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 27, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Cyanoacrylate

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Donor Site Complication

Clinical Trials on Gelatin Sponge;Thrombin, Bovine 5000 IU Multiple Routes Kit [GELFOAM-JMI SPONGE KIT]

3
Subscribe