Convalescent Plasma of Covid-19 to Treat SARS-COV-2 a Randomized Doble Blind 2 Center Trial (CPC-SARS)

December 16, 2020 updated by: Angel Augusto Perez Calatayud, Grupo Mexicano para el Estudio de la Medicina Intensiva

Plasma From Covalescent Donors With Covid-19 for the Management of Patients With SARS-COV-2 Fase II and III, a Doble Center Randomized Doble Blind Trial

The new SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus is an emerging virus originating in Wuhan, China that has spread rapidly throughout the world. As of March 24, 2020, China had reported 81,767 cases with 3,281 deaths, and the World Health Organization (WHO) declared coronavirus 19 (COVID-19) a pandemic. COVID-19 disease is currently a pandemic without specific therapeutic agents and substantial mortality. So it is of utmost importance to find new treatments. Various therapies, such as Remdesivir and Favipiravir, are being investigated but the antiviral efficacy of these drugs is not yet known. The use of convalescent plasma was used as an empirical treatment during the Ebola virus outbreaks in 2014 and in 2015 a protocol was established for the treatment of the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS) with convalescent plasma. This approach with other viral infections such as SARS-CoV, H5N1 avian influenza and H1N1 influenza suggesting that plasma transfusion from convalescent donors was effective.

For this study, plasma from convalescent donors will be collected from those donors who have recovered from SARS-CoV-2 and are between 10 and 14 days after illness. Immunoassays will be carried out to detect total IgM and IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. Patients will receive 1 to 3 convalescent plasma transfusions, depending on the response to treatment.

The expected results are: normal body temperature, decrease in viral load or negative between 10-12 days after transfusion of convalescent plasma, which does not progress to ARDS, extubation of mechanical ventilation within two weeks of treatment, recovery of patient.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Currently, SARS-CoV-2 disease represents a Public Health emergency of international concern. The new coronavirus COVID-19 is estimated to have infected more than 1.8 million people worldwide. The WHO estimates that the contagion rate (R0) of the virus is 1.4 to 2.5, which affects its exponential replication. In the absence of an effective treatment for SARS-CoV-2 disease, there is an urgent need to evaluate therapeutic alternatives that reduce the mortality and morbidity of this virus. There is scientific evidence that supports the use of convalescent donor plasma for the treatment of emerging virus outbreaks and suggests that the transfusion of convalescent donor plasma is effective, and therefore the following question is established:

The use of plasma from convalescent donors by COVID-19 in patients with SARS-CoV-2 disease, stage II (moderate) and III (severe), is a treatment that reduces mortality?

Given that the mortality rate is a very relevant fact, which concerns the general population, the clinical treatments that can be used to reduce the mortality rate of critical cases are of great relevance. There are patients recovered from COVID-19 who are potential plasma donors, and in turn, many critical patients who need to receive it.

Currently, there are no effective treatments to address COVID-19 disease. A recent WHO report indicates that early results with the use of convalescent plasma suggest that it may be a potentially useful treatment modality for severe SARS-CoV-2 disease. The use of convalescent plasma from COVID-19 in acute infected patients is currently considered an experimental therapy. This implies the need to promote clinical trials in order to demonstrate their efficacy. It is recommended that the entire process from donor selection, processing, labeling, storage and distribution to be carried out in a specifically licensed institution. These institutions must have all the guarantees that prove the correct practice of the procedures.

The use of convalescent plasma has been used as rescue therapy in patients with SARS whose condition continues to deteriorate despite treatment with methylprednisolone pulses, in addition, different studies have shown a decrease in hospital stay, and lower mortality in patients treated with convalescent plasma compared to those in which this treatment was not used.

A multicenter randomized study by Hung showed that the use of convalescent plasma in patients with type A H1N1 influenza was associated with a lower viral load and a reduction in mortality 5 days after the onset of symptoms. A Mair-Jenkins meta-analysis showed that mortality was reduced after several doses of convalescent plasma, and another meta-analysis by Luke identified in 1703 patients with influenza pneumonia (1918-1925) that the use of convalescent plasma blood products an absolute reduction. 21% (95% CI 15-27; p = 0.001) in crude fatality with low risk of bias.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

42

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Mexico City, Mexico, 04470
        • Hospital Nava de Alta Especialidad
      • Mexico City, Mexico, 06720
        • Hospital General de Mexico Dr Eduardo Liceaga

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 68 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults 18 to 70 years of age.
  • Serious or critically ill patients confirmed for SARS-CoV-2 disease (RT-PCR).
  • Meet the criteria for Disease with SARS-CoV-2 disease, phase II (Moderate) and phase III (severe) .
  • Suspected Cytokine Release Syndrome with Hscore 169 points.
  • Presence of severe acute hypoxemia with SpO2 <90% in ambient air and / or PaO2 / FiO2 <300 mmHg.
  • Meet criteria (plain chest tomography or plain chest radiograph) for SARS-CoV-2 disease.
  • Supplemental oxygen requirement either through the facial store plus reservoir bag, high-flow nasal tips or advanced airway management and invasive mechanical ventilation support.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patient has no interest in participating in the trial.
  • Bilateral pulmonary infiltrate related to heart failure or other cause of water overload.
  • Virus positive respiratory viral panel other than COVID-19
  • History of allergy to plasma, sodium citrate, or methylene blue.
  • Patients with a history of autoimmune diseases or selective IgA insufficiency.
  • Those patients who are participating in other protocols.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: EXP-PC-F2
Patients with Pneumonia due to SARS-COV-2 phase 2 with Hyperimmune Plasma from Convalescent patients and conventional Therapy (Azithromycin and Hydroxychloroquine)
Convalescent Plasma from patients with covid-19 by Apheresis, the maximum plasma volume withdrawn per session should not exceed 600 mL, excluding the anticoagulant volume, or 16% of the total blood volume, in the absence of volumetric replacement.
Other Names:
  • Hyperinmunne plasma
Placebo Comparator: EXP-NONPC-F2
20 Patients with Pneumonia due to SARS-COV-2 phase 2 with conventional Therapy (Azithromycin and Hydroxychloroquine) and 20% Albumin in Hartman Solution.
use of albumin 20% in 250cc of Hartmann solution
Experimental: EXP-PC-F3
20 Patients with Pneumonia due to SARS-VOC-2 phase 3 with Hyperimmune Plasma from Convalescent patients and conventional Therapy (Azithromycin and Hydroxychloroquine)
Convalescent Plasma from patients with covid-19 by Apheresis, the maximum plasma volume withdrawn per session should not exceed 600 mL, excluding the anticoagulant volume, or 16% of the total blood volume, in the absence of volumetric replacement.
Other Names:
  • Hyperinmunne plasma
Placebo Comparator: EXP-NONPC-F3
20 Patients with Pneumonia due to SARS-VOC-2 phase 3 with conventional Therapy (Azithromycin and Hydroxychloroquine) and 20% Albumin in Hartman Solution.
use of albumin 20% in 250cc of Hartmann solution

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Death
Time Frame: 15 days
any cause
15 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Lenth of stay ICU
Time Frame: 15 days
Time for discharge from the ICU
15 days
Days of Mechanical Ventilation
Time Frame: 15 days
Number of days with ventilatory support
15 days
Suplemental Oxigen support
Time Frame: 15 days
Number of days with need of oxigen suport without Mechanical Ventilation
15 days
Viral Load by RT-PCR
Time Frame: 15 days
changes in viral load
15 days
Inflamatory biomarkers
Time Frame: 15 days
changes in pro- inflamatory and anti-inflamatory biomarkes (IL-6, PCR, Ferritine, D Dimer, IL-8 IL-10
15 days
SOFA (sequencial Organ Failure Assesment)
Time Frame: 15 days
changes in SOFA scale
15 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 20, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 20, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

December 10, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 26, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 26, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

May 28, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 21, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 16, 2020

Last Verified

December 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • DI/20/201/04/19

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

IPD will be shared by petition.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

3 months after completion up to five years

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

proposal should be directed to gmemiinv@gmails.com, to gain access, requestor will need to sign a data access agreement

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Informed Consent Form (ICF)
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on SARS Pneumonia

Clinical Trials on Convalescent Plasma of patients with COVID-19

3
Subscribe