Nurse-led Placement of Peripheral Venous Catheters in Overweight Patients Using Standard or Dynamic Ultrasound-guided Technique (DUST)

June 26, 2020 updated by: Daniel Wilhelms, University Hospital, Linkoeping

A Randomized, Controlled Comparison of Nurse-led Placement of Peripheral Venous Catheters in Overweight Patients Using Standard or Dynamic Ultrasound-guided Technique

Overweight and obesity may be associated with difficult intravenous access leading to longer procedure time and more placement attempts of peripheral venous catheters (PVC). Dynamic ultrasound-guided short-axis needle tip navigation (DUST) may facilitate the procedure.

This was a prospective, randomized, non-blinded study to compare time and placement attempts for nurse-led standard (ST) and ultrasound guided PVC placement in 90 emergency patients with a BMI ≥25kg/m2.

Consenting patients were randomized at a 1:1 ratio to receive PVC by either ST or DUST.

Application time was defined as the time from applying stasis to visible blood in the PVC flash-chamber.

No difference in time was found (medians: ST 42 s; DUST 53.5 s, P = 0.535). There were on average 17 % less placement attempts in the DUST-group (median 1 attempt; Q1 = 1 Q3 = 1) compared to the ST-group (median 1 attempt; Q1 = 1 Q3 = 1.5), (p = 0.031). Patients reported no differences in perceived pain (p = 0.955) or perceived satisfaction (p = 0.342). Pain and subcutaneous infiltrations were the only side-effects reported (ST-group 6, DUST-group 5).

DUST does not decrease time to functional PVC but reduces the number of PVC placement attempts in patients with BMI ≥25 kg/m2.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

89

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Östergötland
      • Linköping, Östergötland, Sweden, 58185
        • University Hospital Linköping

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • REETS prioritization level of "Orange", "Yellow", "Green" or "Blue"
  • 18 years old
  • BMI ≥25 Kg/m2
  • Need of PVC according to Emergency department guidelines
  • Able to give written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable or unwilling to provide informed consent
  • Life threatening patient status (REETS prioritization level of "Red")
  • Immunosuppression
  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Blood infections
  • Puncture zone skin damaged (burns, eczema, infection)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard Technique PVC placement
Standard PVC placement technique
Standard technique with palpation or Visual inspection of the pvc placement site
Experimental: DUST
Dynamic ultrasound-guided short-axis needle tip navigation (DUST)
placement of peripheral venous catheters using ultrasound guided technique

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to application
Time Frame: 1 hour
Application time was defined as the time from applying stasis to visible blood in the PVC flash-chamber.
1 hour
Number of cannulation attempts
Time Frame: 1 hour
The total number of cannulation attempts performed per patient
1 hour

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 1 hour
The perceived satisfaction of the patient as indicated by Numeric Rating scale (NRS, 0 = not satisfied, 10 = maximum satisfaction)
1 hour
Perceived Pain
Time Frame: 1 hour
The perceived pain of the patient as indicated by Numeric Rating scale (NRS, 0 = no pain, 10 = the worst pain possible)
1 hour

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 16, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

June 3, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 27, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

June 2, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 30, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 26, 2020

Last Verified

June 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SE-2020 JG DUST

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Emergencies

Clinical Trials on Standard technique of placing a PVC

3
Subscribe