Safety and Efficacy of Non-ablative Er:YAG Laser Therapy for the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Coexisting Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Retrospective Case Series.

November 11, 2020 updated by: Aleksandra Novakov Mikic
The objective of the study is to retrospectively collect the data on patients who underwent pelvic organ prolapse treatment using a non-ablative Er:YAG laser with SMOOTH mode and to conduct an objective evaluation of safety and efficacy of Er:YAG laser treatment. In a group of patients that have concomitant stress urinary incontinence symptoms, the effectiveness of the treatments on these symptoms will be evaluated as well.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) affect many women and can dramatically decrease their quality of life. Most of the patients diagnosed with stress urinary incontinence also have a degree of pelvic organ prolapse and vice-versa.

One of the more promising new approaches in treating disorders connected to pelvic floor dysfunction has been the introduction of vaginal erbium laser treatment for pelvic organ prolapse.

The primary aim of the present retrospective study was toassess the effectiveness of vaginal erbium laser with SMOOTH mode for the treatment of patients with pelvic organ prolapse and co-existing stress urinary incontinence, if present.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

41

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Novi Sad, Serbia, 21000
        • Poliklinika Novakov i sar.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients that had pelvic organ prolapse with or without concomitant stress urinary incontinence and that were treated using non-ablative Fotona Er:YAG laser (ProlapLase treatment) in the time period from 2015 to 2016 were included in this retrospective study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

All patients that had pelvic organ prolapse with or without concomitant stress urinary incontinence and that were treated using non-ablative Fotona Er:YAG laser (ProlapLase treatment) in the time period from 2015 to 2016 will be included in this retrospective study.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients who failed to attend a follow-up appointment will be excluded from this retrospective case series study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cystocele stage
Time Frame: Before and at all follow ups (up to 3 months after last treatment)
Assesment of POP grade using Baden-Walker scale
Before and at all follow ups (up to 3 months after last treatment)
Severity of stress urinary incontinence
Time Frame: Before and at all follow ups (up to 3 months after last treatment)
assessment of SUI severity using ICIQ-UI questionnaire
Before and at all follow ups (up to 3 months after last treatment)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assesment of safety
Time Frame: Before and at all follow ups (up to 3 months after last treatment)
Assesment of adverse effects
Before and at all follow ups (up to 3 months after last treatment)
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: Before and at all follow ups (up to 3 months after last treatment)
Assesment of patient satisfaction using 0-10 VAS scale
Before and at all follow ups (up to 3 months after last treatment)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 2, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

June 4, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 13, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 11, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Clinical Trials on Fotona ProlapLase

3
Subscribe