Early Oral Feeding vs Traditional Post-operative Care In Emergency Abdominal Surgeries

June 12, 2020 updated by: Ayesha Masood, College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan

EARLY ORAL FEEDING VS TRADITIONAL POST-OPERATIVE CARE IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING EMERGENCY ABDOMINAL SURGERY FOR PERFORATED DUODENAL ULCER(Emergency Abdominal Surgeries)

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been widely studied in elective abdominal surgeries and have shown better outcomes. However the utility of these protocols in emergency abdominal surgeries has not been widely investigated.

OBJECTIVE: To study the outcomes of application of ERAS protocols in patients undergoing perforated duodenal ulcers repairs in emergency abdominal surgeries.

METHODS: This randomized controlled trial was conducted in Surgical Unit 1 BBH from August 2018 to December 2019 with a total sample size of 36 patients with the diagnosis of perforated duodenal ulcer. Patients were randomly divided in two groups. Group A consisted of early oral feeding group and group B consisted of traditional postoperative care group. Outcome results studied were the length of hospital stay, duodenal repair site leak, severity of pain (VAS score) and duration of post-operative ileus. Results were analysed on SPSS version 20 and chi-square and independent t-test were applied.

KEY WORDS: Perforated duodenal ulcer, ERAS protocol, randomized controlled trial, duodenal repair site leak, length of hospital stay, VAS score, post-operative ileus

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

36

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Punjab
      • Rawalpindi, Punjab, Pakistan, 46000
        • Surgical Unit I,Benazir Bhutto Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

13 years to 78 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients older than 15 years with acute abdominal symptoms admitted in ER department, suspected as perforated duodenal ulcer and operated within 24 hours of admission by emergency department surgeon.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients presenting with the following criteria were excluded:
  • Refusal to join the study
  • Peptic ulcers with both bleeding and perforation.
  • Spontaneously sealed off perforations.
  • Malignant ulcers
  • Concurrent extra-abdominal surgery
  • Oral incapacity i.e endotracheal intubation
  • Reoperation within a month
  • ASA grade III/IV
  • Alternative per operative diagnosis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Early oral feeding group(A)
Patients admitted in the HDU postoperatively.NG tube and foley's catheter removed within 12 hours and patients allowed oral sips on day 1 with gradual shift to liquid diet after 12 hrs and semisolid food started after 24 hours later.Patients were given i/v antibiotics,painkillers and i/v PPIs and shifted to oral pain killers on 2nd POD.
Early oral feeding refers to NG tube and foley's catheter removed within 12 hours and patients allowed oral sips on day 1 with gradual shift to liquid diet after 12 hrs and semisolid food started after 24 hours later.Patients were given i/v antibiotics,painkillers and i/v PPIs and shifted to oral pain killers on 2nd POD.
No Intervention: Traditional postoperative care group(B)
Patients in this group were managed traditionally

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: upto 10 Days
Length of hospital stay is defined as duration of single episode of hospitalization. Inpatient days are calculated by subtracting day of admission from day of discharge
upto 10 Days
DAYS OF RETURN OF BOWEL FUNCTION.
Time Frame: Upto 24 hours
It is defined as time to passage of flatus or stools after abdominal surgery.
Upto 24 hours
Pain score by Visual Analog Scale
Time Frame: upto 36 hours
Pain is defined as "an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience that is associated with actual or potential tissue damage or described in such terms" according to International Association for the Study of Pain,measured by Visual Analog Scale(VAS).
upto 36 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Bleeding peptic ulcer
Time Frame: intraoperative period
Frequency of bleeding peptic ulcer
intraoperative period
Mortality rate
Time Frame: immediate postoperative period
Estimation of mortality rate associated with perforated duodenal ulcer
immediate postoperative period

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gender distribution
Time Frame: Perioperative period
To assess the frequency of perforated duodenal ulcer according to gender
Perioperative period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 13, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 30, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

December 27, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 3, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

June 16, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 16, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2020

Last Verified

June 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

Data can be shared on request.Only that described in the text of full article.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Perforated Duodenal Ulcer

Clinical Trials on Early oral feeding/Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols

3
Subscribe