Engaging and Activating Cancer Survivors in Genetic Services Study (ENGAGE)

April 12, 2024 updated by: University of Chicago
To address the gap in access to genetic services, this study will evaluate the effectiveness of an adapted model of remote delivery of genetic services to increase the uptake of recommended genetic assessment and testing in childhood cancer survivors.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

As childhood cancer survivors receive care locally from PCPs, the in-home, collaborative PCP model is designed to increase access to genetic services and uptake of genetic testing in childhood cancer survivors. In this model, individual survivors can access remote telegenetic services and genetic counselors will partner with PCPs to order genetic testing.

This study comprises of a 3-arm randomized Hybrid 1 Effectiveness and Implementation study in 360 CCSS survivors to evaluate the effectiveness of our in-home, collaborative PCP model of remote telegenetic services to increase uptake of cancer genetic testing in childhood cancer survivors compared to usual care options for genetic testing.

Aims are as follows:

To evaluate the effectiveness of our in-home, collaborative PCP model of remote telegenetic services to increase uptake of genetic testing at 6 months as compared to usual care among childhood cancer survivors who meet criteria for cancer genetic testing. Our primary outcome will be a composite variable indicating whether a person had pre-test counseling or genetic testing.

To evaluate the effectiveness of remote videoconferencing to provide greater increase in knowledge and decrease in distress and depression as compared to remote phone services, to examine the moderators of patient outcomes with remote telegenetic services, and to estimate intervention costs and incremental cost-effectiveness of the three study arms.

To conduct a multi-stakeholder, mixed-methods process evaluation to understand patient, provider and system factors associated with uptake of counseling and testing in our adapted in-home, collaborative PCP model and facilitators and barriers to uptake to provide recommendations for future implementation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

450

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Able to understand and communicate in English or Spanish
  • Currently residing in the US
  • Childhood Cancer Survivor Study Participant survivors of the following primary cancers:

    • CNS tumor
    • Sarcoma (except Ewing sarcoma)
    • Hepatoblastoma
    • Leukemia
  • Childhood Cancer Survivor Study Participant with a family history of a child with cancer:

    • 2 or more malignancies in childhood (age 18 or younger)
    • A first degree relative (parent or sibling) with cancer aged 45 or younger
    • 2 or more second degree relatives with cancer aged 45 or younger (same side of family)
    • Parents of the child with cancer are related (consanguinity)
    • Other family history that meets NCCN criteria
  • Able to communicate remotely through remote telegenetic platforms (phone or videoconference) with genetic counselors

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Uncorrected or uncompensated speech defects that would lead to the participant being unable to communicate effectively with genetic counselor
  • Currently residing in a US state or territory where genetic counselors are not licensed to provide care
  • Uncontrolled psychiatric/mental condition or severe physical, neurological or cognitive deficits rendering individual unable to understand study goals and task
  • Participants who have already completed and received a clinically appropriate multi-gene panel genetic testing

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Remote Telegenetics: TELEPHONE (ARM A)

Remote Phone Telegenetics:

Participants with complete pre-test and disclosure counseling with a Genetic Counselor using remote services - TELEPHONE.

Participants will receive standard of care pre-test and disclosure genetic counseling with a genetic counselor by Telephone.
Experimental: Remote Telegenetics: VIDEOCONFERENCING (ARM B)

Remote Videoconferencing Telegenetics:

Participants with complete pre-test and disclosure counseling with a Genetic Counselor using remote services - VIDEOCONFERENCING.

Participants will receive standard of care pre-test and disclosure genetic counseling with a genetic counselor using Videoconferencing Technology.
Experimental: USUAL CARE (ARM C)

Usual Care:

Participants will receive referrals to genetic counseling providers, initiating services on their own. At 6 months, if participants have not sought and received genetic counseling services, they will be offered randomization to ARM A/ARM B.

Participants in the usual care arm will receive usual care services depending on which referral method they choose and if they initiate services. After a 6 month status survey, if they have not had genetic services through usual care they will be offered services and re-randomized to ARM A/ARM B.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants who received testing or genetic counseling
Time Frame: 6 Months status survey (ARM C)
Primary composite outcome collected via remote services records-Yes/No (ARMS A/B)
6 Months status survey (ARM C)
Genetic Knowledge Scale
Time Frame: Baseline - Within 7 Days After Result Disclosure
Change in knowledge (ARMS A/B only). Increased change score indicates increase in knowledge (better).
Baseline - Within 7 Days After Result Disclosure
Impact of Events Scale (IES)
Time Frame: Baseline - Within 7 Days After Result Disclosure
Change in Cancer Specific Distress (ARMS A/B only). Score Range = 0-40. Decreased score change indicates a decrease in distress (better).
Baseline - Within 7 Days After Result Disclosure
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)
Time Frame: Baseline - Within 7 Days After Result Disclosure
Change in Depression (ARMS A/B only). Score Range = 4-20. Decreased score change indicates a decrease in depression (better).
Baseline - Within 7 Days After Result Disclosure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Uptake of genetic counseling, testing, and identification of genetic carriers
Time Frame: 6 month status survey (ARM C)
Collected via remote services records (ARMS A/B)
6 month status survey (ARM C)
Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS)
Time Frame: Baseline - Within 7 Days After Result Disclosure
Change in Anxiety (ARMS A/B only). Score Range = 4-20. Decreased score change indicates a decrease in anxiety (better).
Baseline - Within 7 Days After Result Disclosure
Multi-dimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment Questionnaire (MICRA)
Time Frame: Baseline - Within 7 Days After Result Disclosure
Change in Uncertainty (ARMS A/B only). Score Range = 0-85. Decreased score change indicates a decrease in uncertainty (better).
Baseline - Within 7 Days After Result Disclosure
Change in Health Behaviors (Selected from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Questionnaire and the Health and Diet survey Dietary Guidelines Supplement)
Time Frame: Baseline - 6 Months After Result Disclosure
Change in performance of risk reductive and screening behaviors and communication of results - Yes/No responses (ARMS A/B only).
Baseline - 6 Months After Result Disclosure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tara O Henderson, MD, MPH, FASCO, University of Chicago
  • Principal Investigator: Angela Bradbury, MD, University of Pennsylvania

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 16, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 15, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 25, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 29, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

July 2, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

April 15, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 12, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CIRB21-0176

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer

Clinical Trials on Remote Telegenetic Counseling by Phone

3
Subscribe