Engaging and Activating Cancer Survivors in Genetic Services Study (ENGAGE)

July 20, 2026 updated by: University of Chicago
To address the gap in access to genetic services, this study will evaluate the effectiveness of an adapted model of remote delivery of genetic services to increase the uptake of recommended genetic assessment and testing in childhood cancer survivors.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

As childhood cancer survivors receive care locally from PCPs, the in-home, collaborative PCP model is designed to increase access to genetic services and uptake of genetic testing in childhood cancer survivors. In this model, individual survivors can access remote telegenetic services and genetic counselors will partner with PCPs to order genetic testing.

This study comprises of a 3-arm randomized Hybrid 1 Effectiveness and Implementation study in 360 CCSS survivors to evaluate the effectiveness of our in-home, collaborative PCP model of remote telegenetic services to increase uptake of cancer genetic testing in childhood cancer survivors compared to usual care options for genetic testing.

Aims are as follows:

To evaluate the effectiveness of our in-home, collaborative PCP model of remote telegenetic services to increase uptake of genetic testing at 6 months as compared to usual care among childhood cancer survivors who meet criteria for cancer genetic testing. Our primary outcome will be a composite variable indicating whether a person had pre-test counseling or genetic testing.

To evaluate the effectiveness of remote videoconferencing to provide greater increase in knowledge and decrease in distress and depression as compared to remote phone services, to examine the moderators of patient outcomes with remote telegenetic services, and to estimate intervention costs and incremental cost-effectiveness of the three study arms.

To conduct a multi-stakeholder, mixed-methods process evaluation to understand patient, provider and system factors associated with uptake of counseling and testing in our adapted in-home, collaborative PCP model and facilitators and barriers to uptake to provide recommendations for future implementation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

511

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60637
        • University of Chicago Medical Center
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • University of Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
      • Memphis, Tennessee, United States, 38105-3678
        • St Jude Children's Research Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Able to understand and communicate in English or Spanish
  • Currently residing in the US
  • Childhood Cancer Survivor Study Participant survivors of the following primary cancers:

    • CNS tumor
    • Sarcoma (except Ewing sarcoma)
    • Hepatoblastoma
    • Leukemia
  • Childhood Cancer Survivor Study Participant with a family history of a child with cancer:

    • 2 or more malignancies in childhood (age 18 or younger)
    • A first degree relative (parent or sibling) with cancer aged 45 or younger
    • 2 or more second degree relatives with cancer aged 45 or younger (same side of family)
    • Parents of the child with cancer are related (consanguinity)
    • Other family history that meets NCCN criteria
  • Able to communicate remotely through remote telegenetic platforms (phone or videoconference) with genetic counselors

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Uncorrected or uncompensated speech defects that would lead to the participant being unable to communicate effectively with genetic counselor
  • Currently residing in a US state or territory where genetic counselors are not licensed to provide care
  • Uncontrolled psychiatric/mental condition or severe physical, neurological or cognitive deficits rendering individual unable to understand study goals and task
  • Participants who have already completed and received a clinically appropriate multi-gene panel genetic testing

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Remote Telegenetics: TELEPHONE (ARM A)

Remote Phone Telegenetics:

Participants with complete pre-test and disclosure counseling with a Genetic Counselor using remote services - TELEPHONE.

Participants will receive standard of care pre-test and disclosure genetic counseling with a genetic counselor by Telephone.
Experimental: Remote Telegenetics: VIDEOCONFERENCING (ARM B)

Remote Videoconferencing Telegenetics:

Participants with complete pre-test and disclosure counseling with a Genetic Counselor using remote services - VIDEOCONFERENCING.

Participants will receive standard of care pre-test and disclosure genetic counseling with a genetic counselor using Videoconferencing Technology.
Experimental: USUAL CARE (ARM C)

Usual Care:

Participants will receive referrals to genetic counseling providers, initiating services on their own. At 6 months, if participants have not sought and received genetic counseling services, they will be offered randomization to ARM A/ARM B.

Participants in the usual care arm will receive usual care services depending on which referral method they choose and if they initiate services. After a 6 month status survey, if they have not had genetic services through usual care they will be offered services and re-randomized to ARM A/ARM B.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Who Received Genetic Services
Time Frame: Assessed at 6 Months for ARMS A/B/C
Primary composite outcome collected via remote services records-Yes/No
Assessed at 6 Months for ARMS A/B/C
Genetic Knowledge Scale
Time Frame: Average time from baseline to disclosure was 152.3 days (standard deviation=150.0). (ARMS A/B only)
Change in knowledge. Score range=0-16, and increased change score indicates increase in knowledge (better).
Average time from baseline to disclosure was 152.3 days (standard deviation=150.0). (ARMS A/B only)
Impact of Events Scale (IES)
Time Frame: Average time from baseline to disclosure is 152.3 days, standard deviation = 150.0 days.(ARMS A/B only)
Change in Cancer Specific Distress. Raw Score Range = 0-40. Decreased score change indicates a decrease in distress (better).
Average time from baseline to disclosure is 152.3 days, standard deviation = 150.0 days.(ARMS A/B only)
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)
Time Frame: Average time from baseline to disclosure is 152.3 days, standard deviation = 150.0 days.(ARMS A/B only)
Change in Depression. Score Range = 4-20. Decreased score change indicates a decrease in depression (better).
Average time from baseline to disclosure is 152.3 days, standard deviation = 150.0 days.(ARMS A/B only)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Uptake of Genetic Counseling and Testing
Time Frame: 6 month status survey (ARMS A/B/C)
The uptake of genetic services was obtained through available GC records for the telehealth genetic services arms. The 6-month post-enrollment survey was used for the usual care arm and for the telehealth genetic services arms when GC records did not indicate completion.
6 month status survey (ARMS A/B/C)
Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) Anxiety
Time Frame: Average time from baseline to disclosure is 152.3 days, standard deviation = 150.0 days (ARMS A/B only)
Change in Anxiety. Score Range = 4-20. Decreased score change indicates a decrease in anxiety (better).
Average time from baseline to disclosure is 152.3 days, standard deviation = 150.0 days (ARMS A/B only)
Multi-dimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment Questionnaire (MICRA) Uncertainty
Time Frame: Average time from baseline to disclosure is 152.3 days, standard deviation = 150.0 days (ARMS A/B only)
Change in Uncertainty. Score Range = 0-85. Decreased score change indicates a decrease in uncertainty (better).
Average time from baseline to disclosure is 152.3 days, standard deviation = 150.0 days (ARMS A/B only)
Change in Health Behaviors: Change in Number of Wine/Beer/Mixed Drinks Per Day Among Those With Genetic Testing
Time Frame: Average time from baseline to disclosure is 152.3 days, standard deviation = 150.0 days (ARMS A/B only)
Change in performance of risk reductive and screening behaviors and communication of results from (Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Questionnaire and Health/Diet Dietary Guidelines) - Yes/No responses.
Average time from baseline to disclosure is 152.3 days, standard deviation = 150.0 days (ARMS A/B only)
Change in Health Behaviors: Change in Minutes of Vigorous Exercise Per Week Among Those With Genetic Testing
Time Frame: Average time from baseline to disclosure is 152.3 days, standard deviation = 150.0 days (ARMS A/B only)
Change in performance of risk reductive and screening behaviors and communication of results from (Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Questionnaire and Health/Diet Dietary Guidelines) - Yes/No responses.
Average time from baseline to disclosure is 152.3 days, standard deviation = 150.0 days (ARMS A/B only)
Change in Health Behaviors: Change in Minutes of Moderate Exercise Per Week Among Those With Genetic Testing
Time Frame: Average time from baseline to disclosure is 152.3 days, standard deviation = 150.0 days (ARMS A/B only)
Change in performance of ris k reductive and screening behaviors and communication of results from (Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Questionnaire and Health/Diet Dietary Guidelines) - Yes/No responses.
Average time from baseline to disclosure is 152.3 days, standard deviation = 150.0 days (ARMS A/B only)
Change in Health Behaviors: New Sigmoidoscopy or Colonoscopy Among Those Who Did Not Have One Within a Year of the Baseline Visit
Time Frame: Average time from baseline to disclosure is 152.3 days, standard deviation = 150.0 days (ARMS A/B only)
Change in performance of risk reductive and screening behaviors and communication of results from (Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Questionnaire and Health/Diet Dietary Guidelines) - Yes/No responses.
Average time from baseline to disclosure is 152.3 days, standard deviation = 150.0 days (ARMS A/B only)
Change in Health Behaviors: New Mammogram Within One Year at 6 Months Among Those Who Did Not Have One Within a Year at Baseline
Time Frame: Average time from baseline to disclosure is 152.3 days, standard deviation = 150.0 days (ARMS A/B only)
Change in performance of risk reductive and screening behaviors and communication of results from (Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Questionnaire and Health/Diet Dietary Guidelines) - Yes/No responses.
Average time from baseline to disclosure is 152.3 days, standard deviation = 150.0 days (ARMS A/B only)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Angela Bradbury, MD, University of Pennsylvania
  • Principal Investigator: Tara O Henderson, MD, MPH, University of Chicago

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 16, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 5, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 25, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 29, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

July 2, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 12, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 20, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CIRB21-0176
  • R01CA237369 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe