Enhancing Ultrasound & Photoacoustic for Recognition of Intestinal Abnormalities (EUPHORIA)

March 29, 2023 updated by: iThera Medical GmbH

Enhancing Ultrasound & Photoacoustic for Recognition of Intestinal Abnormalities (EUPHORIA)

The clinical investigation aims to generate clinical data to support the use of Multispectral Optoacoustic Tomography (MSOT) in clinical practice, its inclusion in diagnostic guidelines and to support its reimbursement, specifically to

  • Further validate the application with respect to including ulcerative colitis patients
  • Prepare a study protocol for large-scale clinical validation study in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)
  • Successfully execute the clinical validation study

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The clinical investigation, EUPHORIA, will pave the way to establish Multispectral Optoacoustic Tomography (MSOT) technology for the non-invasive assessment of intestinal inflammation in patients. EUPHORIA will enable commercialization of the technology by finalizing technical improvements that will increase diagnostic outcome beyond what has been shown in a first feasibility study, will improve usability, prepare CE marking for the new device and validate clinical results in a large clinical investigation.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic condition, posing significant burden to patients and health care systems. Patients suffer from a relapsing course of intestinal inflammation, and to date, there is no satisfying noninvasive diagnostic modality for monitoring disease activity. In a recent clinical study conducted by University Hospital Erlangen, MSOT, a technology developed by iThera Medical (ITM), has proven to be superior in diagnostic performance to other procedures.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

540

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Berlin, Germany, 12203
        • Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Infektiologie und Rheumatologie, Hindenburgdamm 30
      • Erlangen, Germany, 91054
        • Universitätsklinikum Erlangen Medizinische Klinik 1
      • Jena, Germany, 07747
        • Universitätsklinikum Jena
      • Milan, Italy, 20132
        • I.R.C.C.S.San Raffaele, Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Via Olgettina 60
    • Lazio
      • Roma, Lazio, Italy, 00133
        • Policlinico Tor Vergata
    • Lombardia
      • Rozzano, Lombardia, Italy, 20133
        • Centro per la Ricerca e la Cura delle Malattie Infiammatorie Croniche Intestinali IRCCS Humanitas

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with confirmed diagnosis of CD or UC in whom endoscopy is indicated

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Established diagnosis of UC or CD for at least three months prior to enrollment
  2. Age ≥ 18 years
  3. Indication for endoscopy according to institutes routine care
  4. Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Stoma independent of localization, ileoanal pouch
  2. Prior bowel surgery other than ileocecal resection, which potentially affects the study procedure by fundamentally changing bowel anatomy by removing the ROI (e.g. (partial) resection of the sigmoid, left sided colon) or repositioning the ROI to an inaccessible location (e.g. right-sided colectomy with transversostomy)
  3. Indeterminate Colitis, irritable bowel syndrome (IBS)
  4. Involvement of the upper gastrointestinal (GI) track only
  5. Isolated proctitis
  6. Complications, such as infectious enteritis, infectious colitis and infectious enterocolitis, abscess formation, intestinal obstruction, toxic megacolon
  7. Tattoo in skin area of interest
  8. Skin lesions, scar tissue or skin diseases affecting the area of imaging
  9. Highly pigmented skin in the area of imaging (e.g. Fitzpatrick skin type V and VI)
  10. The bowel wall is invisible in the Ultrasound image of the MSOT system
  11. Medication leading to increased light sensitivity
  12. Pregnant and breastfeeding women
  13. Mental retardation of the patient with restriction of general judgment and awareness
  14. Exclusion due to safety concerns of investigator (subject who has any condition, including any physical, psychological, or psychiatric condition, which in the opinion of the Investigator, would compromise the safety of the subject or the quality of the data and renders the subject an unsuitable candidate for the study)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Derivation cohort

The derivation sub-cohort will be used to derive optimum reconstruction algorithm parameters of MSOT images.

Primary objective of the derivation cohort is to derive Multispectral Optoacoustic Tomography (MSOT) thresholds maximizing receiver operating characteristic (ROC) to distinguish endoscopic remission from active disease.

As secondary objective, performance of the Multispectral Optoacoustic Tomography (MSOT) device will be analyzed.

cMSOT-2 system is indicated for measurement of the Multispectral Optoacoustic Tomography (MSOT) values in the bowel wall of patients with an established diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), specifically Crohn's Disease (CD) and Ulcerative Colitis (UC). The MSOT values provided may be used as an aid to the assessment of inflammatory disease activity in the bowel wall.
Validation cohort
Objective of the validation cohort is to confirm the performance of Multispectral Optoacoustic Tomography (MSOT) using prescribed thresholds from the derivation cohort.
cMSOT-2 system is indicated for measurement of the Multispectral Optoacoustic Tomography (MSOT) values in the bowel wall of patients with an established diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), specifically Crohn's Disease (CD) and Ulcerative Colitis (UC). The MSOT values provided may be used as an aid to the assessment of inflammatory disease activity in the bowel wall.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Derivation Cohort: derive optimum diagnostic MSOT thresholds
Time Frame: 5-10 days
Derivation cohort: The primary endpoint of the derivation cohort is to derive optimum diagnostic MSOT thresholds based on receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis to distinguish endoscopic active disease from remission in Crohn's Disease (CD) or Ulcerative Colitis (UC) patients.
5-10 days
Validation cohort: re-assess the diagnostic accuracy of MSOT
Time Frame: 5-10 days

Validation cohort:

The primary endpoint of the validation cohort is to re-assess the diagnostic accuracy of MSOT to distinguish endoscopic active disease from remission in an independent cohort. It will be considered successful if a lower 90% confidence of limit at least 75% of area under curve (AUC) is reached

5-10 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Derivation Cohort: MSOT thresholds
Time Frame: 9-10 months
Derive MSOT thresholds using histology as a reference: receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis to distinguish histologic active disease from remission.
9-10 months
Derivation Cohort: MSOT performance, diagnostic accuracy measures
Time Frame: 9-10 months
Diagnostic accuracy measures (area under curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity) of MSOT to distinguish endoscopic active disease from remission.
9-10 months
Derivation Cohort: MSOT performance, diagnostic accuracy
Time Frame: 9-10 months
Diagnostic accuracy of MSOT to distinguish histologic active disease from remission
9-10 months
Validation Cohort: MSOT performance, diagnostic accuracy measures
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Further diagnostic accuracy measures (sensitivity, specificity, predictive values) of MSOT to distinguish endoscopic active disease from remission using the MSOT thresholds from the derivation cohort
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Validation Cohort: MSOT performance, diagnostic accuracy
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Diagnostic accuracy (area under curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, predictive values) of MSOT to distinguish histologic active disease from remission using the MSOT thresholds from the derivation cohort.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Both cohorts: diagnostic accuracy
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Diagnostic accuracy of MSOT to distinguish clinical active disease from remission.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Both cohorts: performance of other non-invasive diagnostic modalities
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Assess performance of other non-invasive diagnostic modalities in order to allow for comparison to MSOT performance. Diagnostic accuracy of each of the various non-invasive tests (CRP, fCal, US, MRI) with respect to the endoscopy (reference test) and histology will be calculated using standard techniques for diagnostic studies. This includes cross tabulation of the index test results by the results of the reference standard, as well as plots of their distribution and ROC curves. Area under the Curve (AUC) estimates and confidence intervals (DeLong) will be calculated. Score confidence intervals (Wilson) will be calculated for proportions such as sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values at the predefined thresholds.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Both cohorts: likelihood ratios and predictive values for active inflammation
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Assess the likelihood ratios and predictive values for active inflammation after MSOT examination.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Both cohorts: performance of MSOT in combination with other modalities
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Explore performance of MSOT in combination with other modalities, e.g. in combination with ultrasound (US) or laboratory. AUC will be estimated for all non-invasive tests with a 95% confidence interval (DeLong) both from the derivation cohort and from the pooled cohorts (derivation + validation) for increased precision. Cohen's κ will be used as a measure of overall agreement. Results will be presented in three-way tables, comparing the new test (MSOT), the non-reference standard (non-invasive modalities), and the reference standard (endoscopy).
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Both cohorts: discriminate different grades of disease activity
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Investigate ability of MSOT and other non-invasive diagnostic modalities, i.e. ultrasoiund (US), fecal calprotectin (fCal), clinical scores to discriminate different grades of disease activity (remission, mild, moderate, high according to endoscopy, histology or clinical scores; for cut-offs.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Both cohorts: interobserver variability
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Explore variations in MSOT diagnostic accuracy between sites and operators (interobserver variability).
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Both cohorts: patient preference
Time Frame: 5-10 days
Evaluate patient preference for different tests using a patient survey
5-10 days
Derivation cohort: MSOT thresholds using clinical scores as a reference
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Derive MSOT thresholds using clinical scores as a reference: ROC analysis to distinguish clinical active disease from remission (only derivation cohort).
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 3, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 19, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 29, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

July 2, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 31, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 29, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Clinical Trials on Multispectral Optoacoustic Tomography (MSOT)

3
Subscribe