Efficacy of Efavirenz 400mg vs. 600mg Combined With Lamivudine and Tenofovir in Treatment Naive HIV Infection

July 3, 2020 updated by: LI Taisheng, Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Peking Union Medical College Hospital

The present study will be a randomized controlled study in which 500 treatment-naive HIV patients will be randomized 1:1 to Efaviren 400mg v.s. 600mg combined with lamivudine and tenofovir. The whole cohort will be followed for two years. Efficacy and safety of each regimen will be evaluated throughout the study.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

As efaviren has been commonly used as the first-line therapy in HIV infection worldwide, its major side effect i.e. the mental effects have been noticed and has a major influence on the adherence and efficacy of ART regimen. Mental effects of efaviren have been especially critical in Chinese patients, as the effective and toxic ranges of efaviren plasma concentration in Chinese patients are very close to each other.

In this study, 500 treatment-naive Chinese patients with a body weight < 60kg will be screened and recruited. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to efaviren 400mg v.s. 600mg combined with lamivudine and tenofovir. All patients will be followed regularly for 2 years, at 0, 2w, 4w, 3m and every 3 months. Virological and immunological measurements will be done at each visit. Meanwhile, various mental scales will be performed at each visit to evaluate the mental effects of each arm.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

500

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100730
        • Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Provision of signed and dated informed consent form
  • Willingness and availability to engage in study activities for the duration of the study
  • Age between 18-65
  • Documented HIV-1 infection (confirmed by Western blot)
  • Received no prior antiretroviral therapy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding or anticipated pregnancy in two years
  • History of AIDS-defining illness
  • Hemoglobin < 9g/dl;or peripheral white blood cell counts < 2000/μl;or neutrophil counts < 1000 /μl;or platelet count < 75,000/μl;
  • Liver disease (transaminase and alkaline phosphatase levels more than three times the upper limit of the normal range (ULN), bilirubin level more than 2.5 times the ULN)
  • Chronic kidney disease (serum creatinine level more than 1.5 times the ULN)
  • Patients with a history of injection drug usage
  • Patients with a history of mental disorders

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Efavirenz 400MG Oral Tablet
Recruited treatment-naive HIV infected patients will be given Lamivudin 300mg per day, tenofovir 300mg per day and efavirenz 400mg per day as antiretroviral treatment.
The experimental arm will receive 400mg efavirenz per randomization with other two antiretroviral medication (tenofovir and lamivudine).
Active Comparator: Efavirenz 600MG Oral Tablet
Recruited treatment-naive HIV infected patients will be given Lamivudin 300mg per day, tenofovir 300mg per day and efavirenz 600mg per day, per standard dose.
The active comparator arm will receive 600mg efavirenz per randomization with other two antiretroviral medication (tenofovir and lamivudine).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline Virological measurements at 12 weeks
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Plasma viral load
12 weeks
Change from Baseline Virological measurements at 24 weeks
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Plasma viral load
24 weeks
Change from Baseline Virological measurements at 48 weeks
Time Frame: 48 weeks
Plasma viral load
48 weeks
Change from Baseline Virological measurements at 72 weeks
Time Frame: 72 weeks
Plasma viral load
72 weeks
Change from Baseline Virological measurements at 96 weeks
Time Frame: 96 weeks
Plasma viral load
96 weeks
Change from Baseline Immunological measurements at 12 weeks
Time Frame: 12 weeks
CD4 T cell count
12 weeks
Change from Baseline Immunological measurements at 24 weeks
Time Frame: 24 weeks
CD4 T cell count
24 weeks
Change from Baseline Immunological measurements at 48 weeks
Time Frame: 48 weeks
CD4 T cell count
48 weeks
Change from Baseline Immunological measurements at 72 weeks
Time Frame: 72 weeks
CD4 T cell count
72 weeks
Change from Baseline Immunological measurements at 96 weeks
Time Frame: 96 weeks
CD4 T cell count
96 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse effects measured by Dizziness Handicap Inventory
Time Frame: 0, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96 weeks
Measure statistically significant difference in perception of dizziness by administering the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) between two groups at different time point. The 25-item tool comprises three sub-scales: physical (DHI-P; 7 items), emotional (DHI-E; 9 items), and functional (DHI-F; 9 items) and each item is scored from 0 to 4. Grading standard: 0-30 points is defiend as minor obstacles, 31-60 points as moderate obstacle, and 61-100 points as serious obstacle with high risk of falling.
0, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96 weeks
Adverse effects measured by Hamilton Depression Scale-24
Time Frame: 0, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96 weeks
Measure statistically significant difference in perception of depression by administering the Hamilton Depression Scale-24 (HAMD-24) between two groups at different time point. The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) has a total of 24 items. 14 items were scored from 0 to 4, and 10 items were scored from 0 to 2. The total score that less than 8 points is defined as no depression, 8 to 20 points as may be depression, scores that more than 20 is defined as mild or moderate depression, and more than 35 points as severe depression.
0, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96 weeks
Adverse effects measured by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
Time Frame: 0, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96 weeks
Measure statistically significant difference in perception of sleep quality by administering the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) between two groups at different time point. PSQI was used to assess the sleep quality of subjects in the last month. It consists of 19 self-evaluation items and 5 other evaluation items, of which only 18 self-evaluation items participate in scoring. 18 items constitute 7 components, and each component is scored according to 0 ~ 3 grades. The PSQI total score ranges from 0 to 21. The higher the score indicates the worser sleep quality.
0, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Taisheng Li, PhD, MD, Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 15, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 3, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

July 9, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 9, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 3, 2020

Last Verified

July 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV/AIDS

Clinical Trials on Efavirenz 400Mg Oral Tablet

3
Subscribe