- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04468113
Clip Marker Placement in Primary Lesions of Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Therapy (Ultra3Detect)
Prospective, Multicenter Registry Study Evaluating the Feasibility of Ultrasound-guided Clipping of Suspicious Intramammary Lesions in Primary Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Therapy (Ultra3Detect)
Neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) is increasingly recommended for patients with early breast cancer, and the rate of patients with pathological complete remission (pCR) is increasing due to the use of modern chemotherapy regimens and targeted therapies, especially in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive (HER2+) breast cancer and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). It is therefore important to mark a lesion (with e.g. clip) before the start of NST in order to safely identify and localize a clip and (former) tumor bed after completion of NST. Reliable sonographic detection of the clip would be preferred to mammography-guided detection and marking. In addition to avoiding radiation exposure by mammography and reducing time, personnel and financial expenditure, ultrasound-guided wire marking of the clip is less painful for the patient than stereotactic wire marking.
The present prospective registry study aims to evaluate how often the intramammary Tumark® Vision clip can be detected by ultrasound after completion of NST in patients with TNBC and HER2+ breast cancer and thus, in the case of pCR, how often the elaborate clipping with mammographic (stereotactic) guidance can be avoided.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Breast cancer patients whose carcinomas have an aggressive tumor biology which implies the need for chemotherapy are increasingly being treated with NST. As a standard procedure, clip placement of the suspicious lesion is performed after ultrasound-guided core biopsy or mammography-guided vacuum biopsy. Clipping is necessary to enable the clear identification of the sonographically suspicious area of the breast and safe surgical removal of the remaining tumor tissue (if any) during a later surgery, even following a good response under NST. The placement of a marker (clip) is particularly important for the precise localization of the original tumor bed in patients with pCR.
There are a number of commercially available markers (clips) which are indicated for intramammary marking of a lesion and which differ in terms of shape and material. Difficulties may arise in placing the clip in the tumor or the tumor center. In addition, the clip can dislocate from the initial location and/or the clip might not be visualized during response monitoring. Evaluations of the ultrasound-visible clip made of nitinol investigated in this study showed very good results regarding marker dislocation and visibility within 7 days after inital placement.The clip, which immediately unfolds into a 3-dimensional spherical structure after insertion into the tissue, could be detected by both sonography and mammography in all 50 cases after the intervention; however, long-term data data at follow-up controls during and after NST are not available so far.
According to current German guidelines, imaging-assisted wire marking is recommended without restriction before breast conserving surgery for non-palpable lesions. The clip is considered the target lesion for wire marking, which can be done under sonographic or stereotactic control. If the clip is reliably visible on ultrasound (even in patients with pCR), the stereotactic control of wire marking can be omitted. Therefore, the ability to visualize a clip in breast ultrasonography is of great importance.
The present multicenter study aims to evaluate the sonographic detection rate of the intramammary Tumark® Vision clips after NST in clinical routine and the proportion of cases in which the clip cannot be detected, and thus the rate of mammography-guided wire markings.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Sherko Kümmel, MD, PhD
- Phone Number: 33001 +49 201174
- Email: S.Kuemmel@kem-med.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Breast Cancer Trials group (several people), MD or PhD
- Phone Number: 33001 +49201174
- Email: breastcancer-trials@kem-med.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Essen, Germany, 45136
- Recruiting
- Interdisciplinary Breast Unit, Kliniken Essen-Mitte
-
Contact:
- Sherko Kuemmel, MD, PhD
- Phone Number: 020117433001
- Email: S.Kuemmel@kem-med.com
-
Contact:
- Mattea Reinisch, MD
- Phone Number: +4920117433001
- Email: M.Reinisch@kem-med.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- female patient aged ≥ 18 years
- written informed consent
- patient's consent to NST
- suspicious unilateral or bilateral intramammary foci that can be safely identified by ultrasound
- no evidence of distant metastasis (complete staging does not have to be present at inclusion)
- indication for breast conserving therapy
- no prior clip placement in the confirmed intramammary carcinoma
- patient is able to undergo NST treatment (even if the indication based on tumor biology is not yet available)
- high compliance and high number of planned relevant surgical interventions in participating study center
- patient can understand the scope of this prospective registry study
Exclusion Criteria:
- allergy to titanium and/or nickel
- pregnancy
- ipsilateral relapse (when NST: no exclusion criterion)
- prior extensive breast surgery (starting from quadrant resection)
- inflammatory breast cancer
- extramammary breast cancer
- multicentric or multifocal breast cancer
- patient is not operable
- patient is already undergoing adjuvant/neoadjuvant therapy
- inability to understand the purpose of the clinical trial or to comply with study procedures
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
US-guided core biopsy and clip placement
Female patients with sonographically suspicious, intramammary foci, scheduled for ultrasound-guided core biopsy and marking of the lesion with the Tumark® Vision Clip
|
Suspicious intramammary lesion is marked with clip
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Sonographic detection rate of clip at the time of surgery after completion of NST
Time Frame: At the time of surgery
|
Intraoperative detection rate of the clip in patients with HER2+ breast cancer or TNBC after at least 12 weeks of NST treatment
|
At the time of surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Number of ultrasound-guided clip placements per patient
Time Frame: Immediately after placement of clip
|
a) Number of lesions marked with a clip per patient and b) Number of clips per lesion
|
Immediately after placement of clip
|
Rate of successful clip placements in the tumor center
Time Frame: Immediately after placement of clip
|
Not successful: clip placement technically not possible or clip was placed outside the tumor (indication of the distance from the tumor center in mm)
|
Immediately after placement of clip
|
Visibility of the device (Tumark® Vision) cannula
Time Frame: During placement of clip
|
Visibility (very good, good, sufficient or bad) of the cannula during US-guided clip placement
|
During placement of clip
|
Complications associated with the application of the clip
Time Frame: Up to 6 months after placement of clip
|
e.g.
hematoma, infection, dislocation, pain (in patients with or without NST)
|
Up to 6 months after placement of clip
|
Sonographic detection rate of clips in patients receiving NST
Time Frame: Immediately after placement of clip as well as after 4-8, 9-12, 13-26 weeks of NST treatment and preoperatively
|
Detection rate at different time points in all patients receiving NST
|
Immediately after placement of clip as well as after 4-8, 9-12, 13-26 weeks of NST treatment and preoperatively
|
Sonographic detection rate of clips in TNBC and HER2+ patients receiving NST
Time Frame: Immediately after clip placement as well as after 4-8, 9-12, 13-26 weeks of NST treatment and preoperatively
|
Detection rate at different time points in TNBC or HER2+ breast cancer receiving NST
|
Immediately after clip placement as well as after 4-8, 9-12, 13-26 weeks of NST treatment and preoperatively
|
Sonographic detection rate of clips in all patients receiving NST and with pCR
Time Frame: Immediately after clip placement as well as after 4-8, 9-12,13-26 weeks of NST treatment and preoperatively
|
Definition of pCR according to residual cancer burden (RCB) score
|
Immediately after clip placement as well as after 4-8, 9-12,13-26 weeks of NST treatment and preoperatively
|
Sonographic detection rate of clips in patients not receiving NST
Time Frame: Immediately after clip placement and preoperatively
|
Subgroup of study population not receiving NST
|
Immediately after clip placement and preoperatively
|
Intraoperative detection rate of the clip in specimen radiographs
Time Frame: At the time of surgery
|
Detection of clip in surgical specimen from the breast subjected to radiography
|
At the time of surgery
|
Intraoperative detection rate of the clip on specimen utrasound images
Time Frame: At the time of surgery
|
Detection of clip in surgical specimen from the breast subjected to ultrasonography
|
At the time of surgery
|
Proportion of patients requiring preoperative, mammography-guided wire marking
Time Frame: Preoperatively
|
If ultrasound-guided wire marking is not feasible, mammography-guided wire marking is performed
|
Preoperatively
|
Proportion of patients with mammographic verification after sonographic wire-marking
Time Frame: Preoperatively
|
If ultrasound-guided wire marking is inconclusive
|
Preoperatively
|
Proportion of patients with artifacts caused by clips
Time Frame: Up to 6 months after placement of clip
|
On ultrasound and/or mammography images
|
Up to 6 months after placement of clip
|
Number of patients with complete pathological remission
Time Frame: Up to 10 weeks after surgery
|
ypT0/is, ypN0 status after histological evaluation (according to Residual Cancer Burden [RCB] score) of Symmans (2007)
|
Up to 10 weeks after surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Sherko Kuemmel, MD, PhD, Interdisciplinary Breast Unit, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Germany
- Study Chair: Mattea Reinisch, MD, Interdisciplinary Breast Unit, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Germany
- Study Chair: Jörg Heil, MD, PhD, Department of Gynecology, Breast Center, Heidelberg University, Germany
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Ruland AM, Hagemann F, Reinisch M, Holtschmidt J, Kummel A, Dittmer-Grabowski C, Stoblen F, Rotthaus H, Dreesmann V, Blohmer JU, Kummel S. Using a New Marker Clip System in Breast Cancer: Tumark Vision(R) Clip - Feasibility Testing in Everyday Clinical Practice. Breast Care (Basel). 2018 Apr;13(2):116-120. doi: 10.1159/000486388. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
- Hurvitz SA, Martin M, Symmans WF, Jung KH, Huang CS, Thompson AM, Harbeck N, Valero V, Stroyakovskiy D, Wildiers H, Campone M, Boileau JF, Beckmann MW, Afenjar K, Fresco R, Helms HJ, Xu J, Lin YG, Sparano J, Slamon D. Neoadjuvant trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and chemotherapy versus trastuzumab emtansine plus pertuzumab in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer (KRISTINE): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Jan;19(1):115-126. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30716-7. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
- von Minckwitz G, Untch M, Blohmer JU, Costa SD, Eidtmann H, Fasching PA, Gerber B, Eiermann W, Hilfrich J, Huober J, Jackisch C, Kaufmann M, Konecny GE, Denkert C, Nekljudova V, Mehta K, Loibl S. Definition and impact of pathologic complete response on prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various intrinsic breast cancer subtypes. J Clin Oncol. 2012 May 20;30(15):1796-804. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.8595. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
- Shah AD, Mehta AK, Talati N, Brem R, Margolies LR. Breast tissue markers: Why? What's out there? How do I choose? Clin Imaging. 2018 Nov-Dec;52:123-136. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- V2_16-04-2020
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Primary Breast Cancer
-
Queen Mary University of LondonAstellas Pharma IncUnknownPrimary Breast Cancer ER+ve | Primary Breast Cancer AR+ve TNBNGermany, United Kingdom, Spain, United States, Ireland
-
University Health Network, TorontoCompletedBreast Cancer Invasive Nos | Primary Invasive Breast CancerCanada
-
RWTH Aachen UniversityRecruiting
-
Tao OUYANGPeking University First Hospital; 307 Hospital of PLA; Peking University People... and other collaboratorsActive, not recruiting
-
German Breast GroupCompleted
-
Fudan UniversityChinese Anti-Cancer AssociationCompleted
-
Fudan UniversityCompleted
-
Klinikum WeissenfelsCompletedPrimary Breast CancerGermany
-
German Breast GroupGerman Adjuvant Breast Cancer GroupCompleted
-
Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian...RecruitingPrimary Breast CancerRussian Federation
Clinical Trials on Tumark® Vision clip
-
Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory DiseaseCompletedPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveChina
-
University Hospital, Clermont-FerrandUnknown
-
nthalmic Pty LtdZhong Jing Wei Shi (Suzhou) Optical Technology Ltd.Recruiting
-
SIFI SpAOpera CRO, a TIGERMED Group CompanyTerminatedCataract | PresbyopiaFrance
-
Alcon ResearchCompleted
-
Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal UniversityCompletedThoracic Surgery | Need for Double Lumen TubesSaudi Arabia
-
Jaeb Center for Health ResearchNational Eye Institute (NEI)Terminated
-
Alcon ResearchCompleted
-
Vital Art and Science IncorporatedNational Eye Institute (NEI); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Retina Foundation of the Southwest and other collaboratorsCompletedDiabetic Retinopathy | Diabetic Macular EdemaUnited States
-
AO Clinical Investigation and Publishing DocumentationCompletedHip FractureGermany, United Arab Emirates, United States