Deltoid Ligament Arthroscopic Repair in Ankle Fractures: Case Series

July 15, 2021 updated by: Nacime Salomão Barbachan Mansur, Federal University of São Paulo
To demonstrate the functional results of patients with ankle fractures operated with arthroscopic deltoid repair.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Introduction: The diagnosis and treatment of ankle medial ligament lesions in malleolar fractures have always been surrounded by controversies. Even in the certainty of deltoid involvement and its consequent instability, the direct repair of this structure is not a consensus. In recent years, the arthroscopic technique to approach this ligament has been described with the objective of potentiating clinical results and minimizing possible complications.

Objective: To demonstrate the functional results of patients with ankle fractures operated with arthroscopic deltoid repair.

Methods: This is a retrospective study in patients diagnosed with ankle fractures associated with acute deltoid injuries and submitted to a malleolar fixation and deltoid arthroscopic repair between January 2018 and January 2020. All patients will fill an epidemiological questionnaire and will be evaluated for pain and function according to the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Score (AOFAS) at 12 months (6-24 months) average of follow-up.

Discussion: The inclusion of the deltoid complex and the low invasiveness of this technique can improve the clinical outcomes of these patients. Additional studies, with a prospective and comparative methodology are required to sustain this proposal.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • SP
      • Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil, 04022-001
        • Federal University of São Paulo

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years to 75 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Tertiary/Quaternary hospital patients

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- acute (less than two weeks) ankle fracture containing a medial ligament injury suspicion will be included. Syndesmotic lesion with a deltoid association will also be addressed

Exclusion Criteria:

  • previous surgery
  • autoimmune diseases
  • neuropathy
  • inflammatory diseases
  • radiographic preoperative findings of ankle arthritis
  • open medial wound
  • coagulopathies
  • any other condition that would contraindicate surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Arthroscopic
Deltoid Arthroscopic Repair in Ankle Fractures
. A 4.5 mm arthroscopic set was used to clean the joint and assess medial and associated injuries. After deltoid injury confirmation through the method already mentioned, the medial gutter was prepared. The ideal positioning for the bone anchor in the medial malleolus followed Vega's recommendations and was located in the inferolateral quadrant created by the intersection of two lines: (1) tibia-talar joint line and (2) tangent line to the medial malleolus joint surface.(14). Sutures were passed respecting the safe zone illustrated by Acevedo at al, at the area between the posterior tibial tendon and the saphenous vein (16-25mm) (15). Sutures were passed but not tightened.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society - Hindfoot Score (AOFAS)
Time Frame: Time Frame: 6th post-operative month
Functional Score (0 to 100 | 100 best score possible | 0 worst score possible)
Time Frame: 6th post-operative month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Time Frame: 6th post-operative month
Pain Score (0 to 10 | 10 worst score possible | 0 best score possible)
Time Frame: 6th post-operative month
Number of Complications related to Treatment
Time Frame: 6th post-operative month
Complications were established as dehiscence, neural damage, infection, and re-rupture. Dehiscence was set inability to heal the soft tissue coverage until the end of the 4th post-operative week. Peripherical nerve damage defined as hypoesthesia or paresthesia not solved until the end of the 6th month after the surgery. Infection termed as clinical signs infection or pus drainage at the wound that required the use of antibiotics. Re-rupture classified as an ankle sprain event during the follow-up.
6th post-operative month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nacime Salomão Barbachan Mansur, MD, PhD, Federal University of São Paulo

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

July 10, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 13, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 13, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

July 16, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 19, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 15, 2021

Last Verified

July 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Arthroscopic_Deltoid_Fx_EPM

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

According to the ICMJE data sharing police, core records will be shared at an online depository and available upon request.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After article publication.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

A formal requisition will be needed, directly addressed to the main researcher. A good scientific reason must be included.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ankle Injuries

Clinical Trials on Arthroscopic Deltoid Repair

3
Subscribe