- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04474574
How Differences in Oximeter Performance May Affect Clinical Decision
How Differences in Oximeter Performance May Affect Clinical Decision: A Pragmatic Clinical Trial in Patients Under CPAP or Noninvasive Ventilation
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Pulse oximetry estimates oxygen saturation in the arterial blood by trans-illuminating a translucent tissue (usually a fingertip, or an ear lobe) with light-emitting diodes at 2 specific wavelengths. Absorption of light at these different wavelengths (660 nm, red, and 940 nm, infrared respectively) differs between oxygenated and deoxygenated hemoglobin. The amount of light which is transmitted at both wave lengths is then quantified and processed by an algorithm that displays a saturation value. The signals are corrected for the pulsatile nature of arterial oxygen flow. Devices also provide pulse rate measured by plethysmography (pulse-related changes in volume of fingertip or earlobe). Since its introduction in the early 1980s, pulse oximetry has proven to be an essential tool for the non-invasive assessment of blood oxygen saturation (SpO2). The use of pulse oximeter is now widespread and interests acute care settings as well as primary care settings. Although there have been recent improvements in signal analysis such as increasing sampling frequency and improving reflectance technology [4], the accuracy of commercially available oximeters differs. First of all, there is variability in the way accuracy of pulse oximetry devices is reported within 2% (± 1 SD) or within 5% (± 2 SD) of reference measurements obtained by blood gases analysis [5]. Secondly, there is a variability between commercially available devices, especially below a SpO2 of 90%. This is partly explained by the fact that calibration of the different algorithms employed in signal processing is limited by the range of saturations that can be safely obtained in healthy volunteers. In respiratory medicine, it has been shown that such variability of accuracy could affect the diagnosis of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Hypopnea Syndrome (OSAHS) and impact on clinical decisions as the recorded number of apneas/hypopneas varied between devices during nocturnal sleep studies [8] Nocturnal hypoxemia (NH) is considered as one of the major determinants of adverse cardiovascular complications and neurocognitive impairment in patients suffering of chronic respiratory failure (CRF). Because of its simplicity, short set-up time and short time response, pulse oximetry is a valuable screening tool for nocturnal hypoxemia despite its disadvantages such as motion artefacts or sensitivity to perfusion. Therefore, definitions of NH rely solely on nocturnal oximetry recording: for instance, in a consensus statement on noninvasive ventilation, spending > 5% of sleep time under 88% of SpO2 was considered as a relevant threshold. Definitions of NH remain arbitrary and different expert-based thresholds have been suggested in the medical literature [10]. Patients suffering from nocturnal hypoventilation, especially those with an average daytime SpO2 close to the steep portion of the hemoglobin dissociation curve (SpO2 between 90-94%), are at higher risk for NH. Therefore, in these patients, device imprecision could have a significant impact on medical decisions, such as deciding to adjust ventilator settings in patients under noninvasive ventilation (NIV) and/or implementing nocturnal oxygen supplementation.
In patients with CRF and NIV, after optimal adjustment of ventilator settings, prescription of nocturnal oxygen supplementation is common practice although impact of nocturnal oxygen supplementation on survival, patient comfort, or prevention of cor pulmonale has yet to be demonstrated. Practically speaking, it increases considerably the burden of the treatment for the patient and care givers (additional connections and tubings, noise of the oxygen concentrator etc.). To our knowledge, no study has evaluated how the use of different pulse oximeters could impact on this decision. Three types of devices are used in clinical practice: pulse oximetry using a probe connected to the home ventilator device, pulse oximetry combined with transcutaneous capnography, or using a "wrist watch" type of device.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Geneva, Switzerland, 1205
- Geneva University Hospital
-
Contact:
- Jean-Paul Janssens, Professor
- Phone Number: +41223722944
- Email: jean-paul.janssens@hcuge.ch
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion criteria:
- > 18 years old
- Awake room air SpO2 between 90 and 94%
- NIV or CPAP therapy
- Ambulatory or hospitalized patient in a clinically stable respiratory condition without any vasopressor treatment.
Exclusion criteria:
- Hospitalization in an acute care setting (e.g. emergency room, Intensive Care Unit, Intermediate Care Unit)
- Any vasopressor treatment
- Peripheral vascular pathologies that can affect digital perfusion (e.g. history of ischemia, Raynaud's phenomenon, any type of vasculitis).
- Mechanical obstacles that may limit quality of signal (e.g. nail polish, bandage, splint, plaster).
- Patient already treated by long term nocturnal oxygen therapy (LTOT)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Case-Only
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Degree of agreement
Time Frame: 3 months
|
The primary endpoint is the degree of agreement between 3 different devices used simultaneously for overnight SpO2 recording for 3 commonly used threshold values defining nocturnal hypoxemia: 5% of time with an SpO2 < 88%, 10% of time with an SpO2 < 90% or 20% of time with an SpO2 < 90%.
|
3 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Bland and Altman analysis of agreement
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Bland and Altman analysis of agreement between devices , two by two (A vs B, A vs C)
|
3 months
|
Degree of agreement with threshold values
Time Frame: 3 months
|
an analysis of agreement of oxygen desaturation index between devices, comparing devices 2 x 2, and using a threshold value of 10/hour as clinically significant
|
3 months
|
Minimal SpO2 value
Time Frame: 3 months
|
a comparison of the minimal SpO2 value and time spent under different threshold levels (88 and 90%) between devices
|
3 months
|
Mean pulse rate
Time Frame: 3 months
|
A comparison of average pulse rate between devices
|
3 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2020-01813
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Sleep Apnea
-
ResMedCRI-The Clinical Research Institute GmbH; University Hospital RegensburgCompletedObstructive Sleep Apnea | Central Sleep Apnea | Mixed Sleep Apnea | Complex Sleep ApneaSwitzerland, Spain, Denmark, Portugal, France, Germany
-
ResMedCompletedObstructive Sleep Apnea | Central Sleep Apnea (Diagnosis) | Chronic Opioid UseUnited States
-
ResMedRWTH Aachen UniversityRecruitingObstructive Sleep Apnea | Central Sleep Apnea | Mixed Sleep ApneaGermany
-
Somnarus IncCompletedObstructive Sleep Apnea | Cheyne-Stokes Respiration | Central Sleep Apnea | Mixed Sleep ApneaUnited States
-
Medtronic - MITGCompletedObstructive Sleep Apnea | Sleep Apnea | Sleep-Disordered Breathing | Central Sleep ApneaUnited States
-
University of California, Los AngelesRecruiting
-
Brigham and Women's HospitalCompletedObstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA)United States
-
LivaNovaRecruitingApnea | Obstructive Sleep Apnea | OSA | Apnea, Obstructive | Apnea+Hypopnea | Apnea, Obstructive Sleep | Hypopnea, SleepUnited States
-
The Hospital for Sick ChildrenRecruitingObstructive Sleep Apnea | Hypoventilation | Central Sleep ApneaCanada
-
Cleveland Medical Devices IncJohns Hopkins University; The Cleveland Clinic; National Institutes of Health...CompletedObstructive Sleep Apnea | Sleep Disordered Breathing | Central Sleep ApneaUnited States
Clinical Trials on Simultaneous recording of nocturnal SpO2
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, AmiensActive, not recruitingPreterm Infant | Exposure to RadiofrequencyFrance
-
Tepecik Training and Research HospitalCompletedComplication | HyperoxiaTurkey
-
University Hospital, GrenobleHôpital Raymond Poincaré; Association Française contre les Myopathies (AFM)...CompletedNeuromuscular Diseases | Alveolar HypoventilationFrance
-
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation TrustUniversity of Oxford; Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, UKCompleted
-
University Hospital, AntwerpCompletedRespiration, Artificial | COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeBelgium
-
Laval UniversityPhilips Respironics; OxynovRecruitingChronic Heart Failure | Central Sleep ApneaCanada
-
G-Tech CorporationEminence Clinical Research, Inc.CompletedGastrointestinal DiseasesUnited States
-
Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de RothschildLa Teppe InstituteRecruiting