Oxytocin and Approach-avoid in Grief

April 27, 2021 updated by: University of Arizona

A Pull to be Close: the Differentiating Effects of Oxytocin and Grief Stimulus Type on Approach Behavior in Complicated Grief

This is a completed project which was initiated prior to January 18,2017

Background: Theoretical models of complicated grief (CG) suggest that maladaptive approach (e.g., perseverative proximity-seeking of the deceased) or avoidance (e.g., excessive avoidance of reminders) behaviors interfere with a person's ability to integrate the loss and recover from their loved one's death. Due in part to conflicting evidence, little mechanistic understanding of how these behaviors develop in grief exists. We sought to (1) identify behavioral differences between CG and non-CG groups based on implicit bias for grief-, deceased-, and social-related stimuli, and (2) test the role of the neuropeptide oxytocin in shaping approach/avoidance bias.

Methods: Widowed older adults with (n = 17) and without (n = 22) CG completed an approach/avoidance task measuring implicit bias for personalized, non-specific, grief-related, and other stimuli. In a double-blinded, randomized, counterbalanced design, each participant attended both an intranasal oxytocin session and a placebo session. Aims were to (1) identify differential effects of CG and stimulus type on implicit approach/avoidance bias [placebo session], and (2) investigate interactive effects of CG, stimulus type, and oxytocin vs. placebo on approach/avoidance bias [both sessions].

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

44

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85721
        • University of Arizona

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

55 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Adult individual experiencing death of a spouse or partner between 6 and 36 months prior to enrollment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to comprehend English;
  • medical contraindications for other components of the study,
  • active suicidality
  • active homicidality
  • active psychotic symptoms
  • ongoing major health conditions such as cancer; uncontrolled hypertension; and medications likely to impact the oxytocin system (e.g., systemic corticosteroids).
  • pregnant status or suspected pregnant status
  • premenopausal status

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Syntocinon First
Crossover design, all participants received experimental condition at either visit one or visit two, and the placebo at the other visit. This arm designates those who received syntocinon at visit one and placebo at visit two. Syntocinon is 24 IU dose administered intranasally in spray form.
Synthetic oxytocin spray, 24 IU per spray.
Placebo spray with no active ingredient.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo First
Crossover design, all participants received experimental condition at either visit one or visit two, and the placebo at the other visit. This arm designates those who received placebo at visit one, and syntocinon at visit two.
Synthetic oxytocin spray, 24 IU per spray.
Placebo spray with no active ingredient.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reaction Time
Time Frame: 120 minutes
Participant reaction time to visual stimuli in a behavioral task
120 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 20, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 12, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

May 12, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 4, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 6, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

August 10, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 29, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 27, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prolonged Grief Disorder

Clinical Trials on Syntocinon

3
Subscribe