Comparison of Postoperative Wound Between Dermabond Prineo(2-octyl Cyanoacrylate Adhesive and Polyester Mesh) and Subcuticular Suture in Simultaneous Total Knee Arthroplasty

August 6, 2020 updated by: Yong In, The Catholic University of Korea

Comparison of Postoperative Wound Between Dermabond PRINEO™(2-octyl Cyanoacrylate Adhesive and Polyester Mesh) and Subcuticular Suture in Simultaneous Total Knee Arthroplasty

This study aims to compare the clinical results of postoperative wound between Dermabond PRINEO™(2-octyl Cyanoacrylate adhesive and polyester mesh) and subcuticular suture in simultaneous total knee arthroplasty

There is previous studies over whether or not to use skin adhesive material is superior or inferior to subcuticular suture This study prospectively randomized patients receiving bilateral total knee arthroplasty(TKA). Patients preference and clinical results was investigated in both knee of same patients who received skin adhesive or subcuticular suture in each knee.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

17 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients for total knee arthroplasty
  • having medicare insurance

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Rheumatoid arthritis
  • Other inflammatory arthritis
  • Neuropsychiatric patients
  • Allergy or intolerance to study material
  • Patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists(ASA) score of IV (angina, congestive heart failure, dementia, cerebrovascular accident)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Dermabond group
close capsule using 1-0 vicryl suture material close subq layer using 1-0 and 2-0 bicryl suture material and close skin layer using DERMABOND™ PRINEO™
DERMABOND™ PRINEO™(2-octyl Cyanoacrylate Adhesive and Polyester Mesh) and subcuticular nylon suture are applied for each knee
No Intervention: Subcuticular group
close capsule using 1-0 vicryl suture material close subq layer using 1-0 and 2-0 bicryl suture material and close skin layer using 3-0 Dermalon with subcuticular suture method

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
wound Hypertrophy scale at postoperative 6 month
Time Frame: at postoperative 6 months
Vancouver scar scale, patient and observer report scar assessment scale
at postoperative 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Skin closure time
Time Frame: operation day
Skin closure time for each group
operation day
wound complication
Time Frame: postoperative 2 weeks
postoperative 2 weeks
wound complication
Time Frame: postoperative 6 weeks
postoperative 6 weeks
wound complication
Time Frame: postoperative 3 month
postoperative 3 month
wound complication
Time Frame: postoperative 6 month
postoperative 6 month
Stitch out time
Time Frame: postoperative 2 weeks
postoperative 2 weeks
Stitch out visual visual analogue scale(VAS)
Time Frame: postoperative 2 weeks
VAS range from 1 to 10 ( 1means minimal pain 10 means maximal pain)
postoperative 2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 6, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

July 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 1, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 6, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

August 10, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 10, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 6, 2020

Last Verified

August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Dermabond vs. Subcuticular

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis, Knee Cutaneous Suture, Dermabond, Subcuticular Suture

Clinical Trials on DERMABOND™ PRINEO™(2-octyl Cyanoacrylate Adhesive and Polyester Mesh) vs subcuticular nylon suture

3
Subscribe