Evaluation of a Health Monitoring Platform for Elderly in Home Care Context (ACCORDS)

August 17, 2020 updated by: Rennes University Hospital

Combinatorial Approach of Connected Functions for Multimodal Health Data Collection

This study aims at, as a primary objective, studying acceptability of elderly about a health monitoring platform for home support and home care. The secondary objective consists in studying the correlation of different health data evolution and the frailty trajectory of the subject.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

80 years and older (OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 80 years old
  • Living at home or in senior residence
  • Evaluated as being robust according to the Fried's frailty test (0 met criteria)
  • Affiliated or beneficiary of a social protection scheme
  • Having given written consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hospitalization during the month preceding the first visit
  • Subject suffering from cognitive disorders preventing proper use of the device
  • Subject being unable to give by himself / herself his / her consent to participate in the trial
  • Person subject to legal protection (safeguard of justice, trusteeship, guardianship, persons deprived of liberty)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: OTHER
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Health monitoring
Subjects have to monitor their health autonomously using the monitoring platform (connected health devices and app on the touchpad).
  • The connected scale (iHealth HS2) measures weight from 5 to 180kg and BMI.
  • The connected actimeter (iHealth AM4) monitors activity (number of steps, distance, calories), sleep (automatic sleep recognition, effective sleep time, number of awakenings) and swimming (automatic activity recognition, session duration, swim type recognition and number of laps).
  • The connected blood pressure monitor (iHealth Track KN-550BT)is a medical device that measures blood pressure and pulse rate.
  • The activity monitor (manufactured by RF Track) consists of a housing that can be positioned as a pendant or at the hip. It includes an accelerometer, gyroscope, magnetometer, barometer, radio transceiver, and led. The sensor records the raw signals.
  • The touchpad allows the subject to connect to the Calliope app. This app allows the data recovery, storage, analysis, visualization, and all the required settings for the platform to work together.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Beliefs modified questionnaire
Time Frame: 1 month
questionnaire by Fishbein & Ajzen (1975), is a qualitative questionnaire, with no scoring
1 month
UTAUT modified questionnaire
Time Frame: 1 month
questionnaire by Venkatesh et al. (2003) Final score is graded 1 to 10, 10 being the best score
1 month
Usability SUS questionnaire
Time Frame: 1 month
questionnaire by Brooks (1996) Final score is graded 10 to 70, 70 being the best score
1 month
Comfort modified questionnaire
Time Frame: 1 month
questionnaire by Knight & Baber (2005) Final score is graded 11 to 77, 77 being the best score
1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Motivation modified questionnaire
Time Frame: inclusion
questionnaire by Deci & Ryan (1987), is a qualitative questionnaire, with no scoring
inclusion
Beliefs modified questionnaire
Time Frame: inclusion
questionnaire by Fishbein & Ajzen (1975), is a qualitative questionnaire, with no scoring
inclusion
Beliefs modified questionnaire
Time Frame: 12 months
a priori acceptability questionnaire by Fishbein & Ajzen (1975), is a qualitative questionnaire, with no scoring
12 months
Beliefs modified questionnaire
Time Frame: 24 months
a priori acceptability questionnaire by Fishbein & Ajzen (1975), is a qualitative questionnaire, with no scoring
24 months
UTAUT modified questionnaire
Time Frame: inclusion
questionnaire by Venkatesh et al. (2003) Final score is graded 1 to 10, 10 being the best score
inclusion
UTAUT modified questionnaire
Time Frame: 12 months
questionnaire by Venkatesh et al. (2003) Final score is graded 1 to 10, 10 being the best score
12 months
UTAUT modified questionnaire
Time Frame: 24 months
questionnaire by Venkatesh et al. (2003) Final score is graded 1 to 10, 10 being the best score
24 months
Comfort modified questionnaire
Time Frame: inclusion
questionnaire by Knight & Baber (2005) Final score is graded 11 to 77, 77 being the best score
inclusion
Comfort modified questionnaire
Time Frame: 12 months
questionnaire by Knight & Baber (2005) Final score is graded 11 to 77, 77 being the best score
12 months
Comfort modified questionnaire
Time Frame: 24 months
questionnaire by Knight & Baber (2005) Final score is graded 11 to 77, 77 being the best score
24 months
Usability SUS questionnaire
Time Frame: inclusion
questionnaire by Brooks (1996) Final score is graded 10 to 70, 70 being the best score
inclusion
Usability SUS questionnaire
Time Frame: 12 months
questionnaire by Brooks (1996) Final score is graded 10 to 70, 70 being the best score
12 months
Usability SUS questionnaire
Time Frame: 24 months
questionnaire by Brooks (1996) Final score is graded 10 to 70, 70 being the best score
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Dominique SOMME, MD, PhD, Rennes University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

September 1, 2020

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

September 1, 2023

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

March 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 12, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 12, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

August 17, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 19, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 17, 2020

Last Verified

August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2019-A02316-51

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Frailty

Clinical Trials on Health monitors

3
Subscribe