Clinical Trial Comparing Negative Pressure Wound Therapy and Standard Dry Dressings (BERLYTZ)

May 23, 2022 updated by: Sylvain Steinmetz, University of Lausanne Hospitals

Monocentric Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (PREVENA™) and Standard Dry Dressings on Oozing of Closed Incision After Revision Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Surgery or Lower Extremity Amputation Surgery

Negative pressure dressings are currently widely used in wound management. Their use is gradually being extended to surgical scars. However, studies demonstrating a clear benefit are rare, particularly in terms of postoperative discharge, the need for surgical revision due to prolonged oozing and cost.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the benefit of such a device in post-operative revision prosthesis surgery (hip and knee), as well as lower limb amputations.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Vaud
      • Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland, 1011
        • Recruiting
        • Lausanne University Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Sylvain Steinmetz, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Diane Wernly, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Olivier Borens, PR

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Signed informed consent
  • Age ≥ 18 years old
  • Planned Surgery :

    1. revision of a hip or knee prosthesis, in 1 or 2 stages, at explantation and/or reimplantation, where
    2. elective amputation of a lower limb (transmetatarsal, trans-tibial (Burgess) or trans-femoral (Gritti-Stokes) level (nb: patients for whom amputation of both lower limbs is planned will be excluded)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known allergy to dry dressings
  • Patient already included in another clinical trial
  • Inability to discern and/or inability to follow study procedures
  • Known allergy to silver or another component of the system Prevena™
  • Amputation for tumor pathology

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard dry dressing in total hip or knee arthroplasty
Standard dressing in total hip or knee arthroplasty surgery revision: a dry sterile dressing is applied on the surgical wound at the end of surgery
A standard dry sterile dressingwith non-adherent absorbent pad is applied on the surgical wound at the end of surgery
Experimental: Prevena in total hip or knee arthroplasty

Prevena incision management system in total hip or knee arthroplastsy surgery revision:

The Prevena incision management system is applied on the surgical wound at the end of surgery

A Prevena Plus DuoTM Dressing Kit (KCI) is applied on the surgical wound at the end of surgery.
Active Comparator: Standard dry dressing in lower limb amputation
Standard dressing in lower limb amputation: a dry sterile dressing is applied on the surgical wound at the end of surgery
A standard dry sterile dressingwith non-adherent absorbent pad is applied on the surgical wound at the end of surgery
Experimental: Prevena in lower limb amputation

Prevena incision management system in lower limb amputation:

The Prevena incision management system is applied on the surgical wound at the end of surgery

A Prevena Plus DuoTM Dressing Kit (KCI) is applied on the surgical wound at the end of surgery.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Discharge after 7 days
Time Frame: Day 7- Day 8
Presence of discharge at 7 days postoperatively (Day 7) Condition of the dry dressing applied on Day 7 and evaluated at least 24 hours after application (Day 8)
Day 7- Day 8

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Complications
Time Frame: Day 0 - Day 14
Occurrence of post-operative complications from Day 0 to hospital discharge (or max Day 14)
Day 0 - Day 14
Revision surgery
Time Frame: Day 0 - Day 14
Occurrence of revision surgery due to persistent discharge from the day of the operation (Day 0) until discharge from hospital (or max Day 14)
Day 0 - Day 14
Hospitalisation
Time Frame: Day 0 - Day 14
Duration of hospitalisation from Day 0 to end of hospitalisation (in days)
Day 0 - Day 14
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: Day 7
Reported patient satisfaction based on the responses obtained from the "Patient Evaluation Form" questionnaire completed by the patient. A numeric pain scale is included: the patient rates his pain on a scale of 0 to 10 when the last dry dressing (Opsite TM) is changed or when Prevena system (TM) is removed. Zero means "no pain," and 10 means "the worst possible pain."Participant will complete the questionnaire on Day 7.
Day 7
Costs
Time Frame: Day 0 - Day 7
Dressing repair costs (sum of the price of all dressings and materials needed for dressing repair) from Day 0 to Day 7 (in Swiss francs)
Day 0 - Day 7
AE & ADE
Time Frame: Day 0 - Day 14
Occurrence, intensity, severity, causal link with the medical device and the procedure, and characteristics of the adverse events (AEs) considered to be at least possibly related to the medical device or the procedure (= adverse events, ADEs), occurring from the day of the operation (Day 0) until discharge from hospital (or max Day 14).
Day 0 - Day 14

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sylvain Steinmetz, MD, Lausanne University Hospital (Switzerland)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 15, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 18, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

August 20, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 25, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 23, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Amputation

Clinical Trials on Dry dressing

3
Subscribe