Effect of Pulsed Dye Laser on Photodynamic Therapy of Port-Wine Stains

August 29, 2020 updated by: Gang Ma

Effect of Pulsed Dye Laser on Photodynamic Therapy of Port-Wine Stains: a Single Center, Perspective, Paralled, Controlled Clinical Trial

Port-wine stain (PWS) is a congenital capillary malformation with an incidence of 3-5/1000 newborns and grows commensurately with the affected individual.

Although PDL treatment can significantly lighten and reduce most PWS lesions, 20% of cases show little improvement after treatment. Our previous researches suggested that PDT may be a beneficial option for PWS cases that are resistant to multiple PDL treatments.

In this study, a single center, prospective, parallelled, controlled study was conducted to compare the efficacy of PDT on PWS treated with standard PDL and those without any treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Port-wine stain (PWS) is a congenital capillary malformation characterized by ectatic capillaries and postcapillary venules located predominantly in the papillary and mid-reticular layers of the dermis. It has an incidence of 3-5/1000 newborns and grows commensurately with the affected individual.

Pulsed dye laser (PDL) of 585 and 595 nm is considered to be the gold standard for treating PWS. Although PDL treatment can significantly lighten and reduce most PWS lesions, 20% of cases show little improvement after treatment. This ratio therefore represents a relatively large number of patients who may benefit from an alternative treatment modality.

Vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been used to treat PWS since the 1990s. In 1990, Orenstein et al. used a chicken comb model to show that PDT can treat hypervascular dermal lesions while leaving the normal overlying epidermis completely intact. The use of vascular-targeted PDT for treating PWS was first described in 1991. PDT can theoretically target ectatic capillaries of all diameters and, in contrast to PDL, can induce vascular damage deeper in the dermis, with a considerably reduced risk of epidermal necrosis due to its vascular-selective characteristics. Previous studies have also demonstrated that PDT is an effective and safe means of improving the appearance of PWS.

Our previous researches suggested that PDT may be a beneficial option for PWS cases that are resistant to multiple PDL treatments.Therefore, the choice of early treatment for PWS is very important . The effect of PDL therapy on the follow-up photodynamic treatment of PWS unknown.

In this study, a single center, prospective, parallelled, controlled study was conducted to compare the efficacy of PDT on PWS treated with standard PDL and those without any treatment. Our objectis to explore whether the previous PDL treatment will affect the efficacy of the follow-up PDT on PWS, so as to provide early treatment options for children with PWS.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

68

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 months to 12 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged 1-14 years who met the criteria for diagnosis of port-wine stain in The International Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies(ISSVA);
  • Patients in the untreated group had never received any treatment;
  • Patients in the PDL-treated group received at least five 595 nm pulse dye laser (PDL) treatment (Vbeam laser; candela Corp., Boston, MA), The time interval between
  • Photodynamic therapy and the last pulse dye laser treatment was at least 3 months;
  • There were complete medical records, standard photos and test records before and after treatment;
  • After fully understanding the treatment plan and risks, patients voluntarily signed the informed consent and was willing to accept clinical trials and cooperate with follow-up.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Original infection, eczema, ulcers in the lesion site; The patient has a history of seizures in the last six months or the condition is not under control;
  • Hypersensitivity to porphyrins, hypersensitivity constitution;
  • Scar constitution;
  • A history of heavily UV exposure in the last 3 months;
  • With abnormal electrocardiogram, heart disease, liver damage, pregnancy or other underlying diseases that may affect treatment;
  • Patients are participating in other clinical trials.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: PDL-treated PWS
PWS treated with PDL before will be treated with PDT
All patients will be treated under general anesthesia. After carefully covering the normal skin, hematoporphyrin monomethyl ether (HMME; Shanghai Fudan-Zhangjiang Bio-Pharmaceutical, Shanghai, China) was i.v. transfused at a dose of 5 mg/kg for 20 min at a constant rate. Five to 10 min after the onset of HMME transfusion, continuous irradiation at 532 nm (532-nm light-emitting diode green-light therapeutic apparatus; Wuhan Yage Optic and Electronic Technique, Wuhan, China) was applied with a power density of 80- 95 mW/cm2 for 20-30 min. Concomitant forced air cooling was applied during irradiation for epidermal protection. Post-treatment skin cooling was performed by intermittent application of ice packs over a 3-day period, to minimize pain and potential thermal damage. To prevent the effects of photosensitivity, patients were instructed to avoid exposure to strong light for at least 14 days after treatment.
Other Names:
  • light-emitting diode green-light therapeutic apparatus
Experimental: without treatment PWS
PWS without treatment before will be treated with PDT
All patients will be treated under general anesthesia. After carefully covering the normal skin, hematoporphyrin monomethyl ether (HMME; Shanghai Fudan-Zhangjiang Bio-Pharmaceutical, Shanghai, China) was i.v. transfused at a dose of 5 mg/kg for 20 min at a constant rate. Five to 10 min after the onset of HMME transfusion, continuous irradiation at 532 nm (532-nm light-emitting diode green-light therapeutic apparatus; Wuhan Yage Optic and Electronic Technique, Wuhan, China) was applied with a power density of 80- 95 mW/cm2 for 20-30 min. Concomitant forced air cooling was applied during irradiation for epidermal protection. Post-treatment skin cooling was performed by intermittent application of ice packs over a 3-day period, to minimize pain and potential thermal damage. To prevent the effects of photosensitivity, patients were instructed to avoid exposure to strong light for at least 14 days after treatment.
Other Names:
  • light-emitting diode green-light therapeutic apparatus

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual evaluation
Time Frame: Change from Baseline Visual evaluation at 3 months after PDT treatment
Standard digital photographs were obtained using consistent camera settings (EOS 80D; Canon, Tokyo, Japan), light conditions and patient positions. Three independent, blinded assessors qualitatively assessed color blanching
Change from Baseline Visual evaluation at 3 months after PDT treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Chromameter evaluation
Time Frame: Change from Baseline Chromameter evaluation at 3 months after PDT treatment
Blanching of the PWS lesions was evaluated using a SkinColorCatch" chromameter (Delfin Technologies, Kuopio, Finland).
Change from Baseline Chromameter evaluation at 3 months after PDT treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

October 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 30, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 22, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 29, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

September 3, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 3, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 29, 2020

Last Verified

August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Port-Wine Stain

Clinical Trials on PDT treatment device

3
Subscribe