The Benchmark Clinic: An Interdisciplinary Comprehensive Care Model for People With Parkinson Disease

April 14, 2022 updated by: Duke University

The purpose of this study is to determine if an interdisciplinary clinic can help people with Parkinson's disease care for themselves, improve their ability to follow recommended treatments, and have fewer problems like falls or visits to the emergency room.

Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either care from the interdisciplinary clinic or standard neurological specialist care.

This study involves questionnaires both before and 3 months after participation in a one time interdisciplinary care clinic or standard care depending on which type of care the participant is randomized to. Participants will be in the study for up to 6 months. The study will end upon completion of questionnaires about 3 months after treatment with the interdisciplinary care clinic or standard care.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

56

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Duke University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with Parkinson's Disease over the age of 30,
  • Caregiver willing to also participate.
  • Must be able to provide consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

-Atypical Parkinsonism

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Interdisciplinary Care
If assigned to the interdisciplinary group, participants will see social work, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech therapy, and pharmacy in a scheduled rotation for about 45 minutes each. After these evaluations, the team meets with the participant's doctor for a discussion of treatment. After this meeting, the participants doctor will meet to discuss a treatment plan and make recommendations.
If assigned to the interdisciplinary group, participants will see social work, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech therapy, and pharmacy in a scheduled rotation for about 45 minutes each. After these evaluations, the team meets with the participants doctor for a discussion of treatment. After this meeting, the participants doctor will meet to discuss a treatment plan and make recommendations.
No Intervention: Standard of Care
If assigned to standard of care, group participants will have a normally scheduled visit with neurologist.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in composite score on self-efficacy scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months after interdisciplinary or standard clinic visit
Title of scale: Self-efficacy Scale for Chronic Diseases. This is a validated scale. Minimum score is 1, Maximum score is 10. Higher score is a better outcome.
Baseline, 3 months after interdisciplinary or standard clinic visit

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in total weekly minutes exercised as measured by patient engagement survey.
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months after interdisciplinary or standard care visit
Investigator developed patient engagement survey
Baseline, 3 months after interdisciplinary or standard care visit
Change in caregiver burden score on Zarit Burden Interview scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months after interdisciplinary or standard care visit
Title of scale: Zarit Burden Interview. This is validated scale. Minimum score is 0. Maximum score is 88. Higher score is a worse outcome.
Baseline, 3 months after interdisciplinary or standard care visit
Number of skilled therapy visits as reported by participant
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months after interdisciplinary or standard care visit
Number of skilled therapy visits as reported by participant
Baseline, 3 months after interdisciplinary or standard care visit
Number of hospitalizations as reported by participant and medical record review
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-6 months after interdisciplinary or standard care visit
Number of hospitalizations as reported by participant and medical record review
Baseline, 3-6 months after interdisciplinary or standard care visit
Number of ER visits as reported by participant and medical record review
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-6 months after interdisciplinary or standard care visit
Number of ER visits as reported by participant and medical record review
Baseline, 3-6 months after interdisciplinary or standard care visit
Number of falls as reported by participant
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months after interdisciplinary or standard care visit
Number of falls as reported by participant
Baseline, 3 months after interdisciplinary or standard care visit
Number of contraindicated medication combinations as determined by medical record review
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-6 months after interdisciplinary or standard care visit
Number of contraindicated medication combinations as determined by medical record review
Baseline, 3-6 months after interdisciplinary or standard care visit

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kyle Mitchell, MD, Duke University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 3, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 28, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 14, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 14, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

September 21, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 22, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 14, 2022

Last Verified

April 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson Disease

Clinical Trials on Interdisciplinary Visit

3
Subscribe