Operation of the GHPSJ Clinical Ethical Reflection Assistance Group During the COVID-19 Period (ETHICOVID)

March 6, 2023 updated by: Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph

Operation of the Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph Clinical Ethical Reflection Assistance Group During the COVID-19

Between March and May 2020, Ile-de-France hospitals faced an influx of patients infected with the COVID 19 virus. Faced with the scale of the pandemic, the aggressiveness of this pathology, severe respiratory complications and the shortage of resuscitation beds , the teams had to make difficult decisions on the therapeutic strategy, the orientation of patients in the event of respiratory distress and their intensive care status. To do this, each establishment reflected in an emergency context on procedures for collegial deliberation and assistance in ethical reflection, based on the recommendations of the National Consultative Ethics Committee and learned societies such as the French Society. of Anesthesia and Resuscitation or the French Society of Support and Palliative Care.

Some hospitals had already institutionalized the ethical approach upstream of the health crisis. For example, the Groupe d'Aide à la Réflexion Éthique Clinique (GAREC) was created in November 2005 within the Paris Saint-Joseph Hospital Group. GAREC is a collegial and multidisciplinary entity, made up of 8 members who intervene at the request of caregivers when a clinical situation turns out to be ethically complex. He gives an advisory opinion, the decision belonging to the referring physician.

At the start of the COVID period, GAREC changed its structure, organization and operation in order to respond to the multiple issues posed by the complexity of the health situation.

This study seeks to analyze the adaptation mechanisms put in place by this group during the epidemic period as well as the nature of the benefit provided to the caregivers who requested it, to the patients and to their relatives.

  • Adaptation mechanisms: during the COVID period, GAREC was extended to other paramedical professions (psychologists, nurses), thus increasing from 8 to 15 members. It has set up 2 weekly meetings, an on-call duty and on-call duty. The requests were made easier: they could be done by phone, by email, day or night. Several questions emerge: What were the motivations for enlarging the group? How were the members integrated into this group? What were its operating methods? How and by whom was it seized? For what purpose? Were the intervention teams multidisciplinary?
  • Nature of the benefit provided by GAREC: it will be approached by semi-structured interviews via a qualitative research method.

This work is part of a broader reflective perspective:

  • What representation of ethics underlies this device?
  • Does the institutionalization of ethics help to enhance or make invisible what ethics owes to daily healthcare practices?
  • To what extent does the institutionalization of clinical ethics make health institutions more human and virtuous?
  • Under what conditions can a device like GAREC go beyond the role of ethical guarantor and transform the institution and nursing practices in the service of a collective reflective approach? This study will be carried out on patient data usually collected as part of their care and on data collected through semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals. As such, it fits into the perspective of grounded theory.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

26

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 75014
        • Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients hospitalized for COVID-19 infection who benefited from GAREC's intervention between 03/25/2020 and 05/07/2020.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients:

    • Major
    • Hospitalized for a COVID-19 infection and for which GAREC intervened between 03/25/20 and 05/07/20
  • Caregivers:

    • GAREC members (between 8 and 15 caregivers)
    • Having called on GAREC (between 10 and 20 caregivers)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients

    • Patient under guardianship or curatorship
    • Patient deprived of liberty
    • Patient under legal protection
    • Patient objecting to the use of their data for this research
  • Caregivers o Caregiver opposing the use of their data for this research

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Patients with COVID-19 infection
This study will be carried out on patient data usually collected as part of their care. The patients were infected with COVID-19 and hospitalized between 03/25/2020 and 05/07/2020, and who benefited from GAREC's intervention.
Nursing staff AND GAREC Members
This study also concerns data collected in the context of semi-structured interviews with health professionals, in a prospective manner. These are caregivers who are members of GARED or who called on GAREC between 25/03/2020 and 07/05/2020.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Interest of GAREC
Time Frame: Year 1
This outcome is to evaluate the benefit of nursing staff in the ethical process. In a qualitative study like this, no primary endpoint is established.
Year 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marie-Lorraine de WARREN, Nurse, Groupe hospitalier Paris saint Joseph

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 9, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 9, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

March 6, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 12, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 13, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

October 14, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 7, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Covid19

3
Subscribe