- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04592887
Feasibility Study of FLASH Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Symptomatic Bone Metastases (FAST-01)
Study Overview
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Ohio
-
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45044
- Cincinnati Children's Proton Therapy Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient age at least 18 years
- Up to 3 painful bone metastasis(-es) in the extremities
- Bone metastases that can be treated using pre-defined treatment field sizes (7.5 cm x 7.5 cm; 7.5 cm x 10 cm; 7.5 cm x 12 cm; 7.5 cm x 14 cm; 7.5 cm x 16 cm; 7.5 cm x 18 cm; 7.5 cm x 20 cm), without overlap of radiation fields
- Life expectancy of >2 months (in the judgement of the investigator)
- Patients who are able to comply with the protocol
- Provision of signed and dated informed consent form
Exclusion Criteria:
- Prior radiotherapy to the treatment site(s)
- Lesions of the feet, hands, wrists are not eligible treatment sites for FLASH
- More than 3 painful bone metastases of the limbs requiring palliative radiotherapy
- Tumor lysis of >50% of the circumferential bone cortex, or other factors considered to place the subject at significant risk of pathologic fracture
- Patients with bone fractures and/or metal implants in the treatment field
- Patients who will receive cytotoxic chemotherapy within 1 week prior to or 1 week following their planned radiation treatment
- Prior local therapy modality to the treatment site(s) within 2 weeks of study enrollment
- Patients with pacemakers or other implanted devices at risk of malfunction during radiotherapy
- Patients with any other medical condition or laboratory value that would, at the discretion of the investigator, preclude the patient from participation in this clinical investigation
- Patients at known risk of enhanced normal tissue sensitivity to radiotherapy due to inherited predisposition or documented comorbidity that might lead to hypersensitivity to ionizing radiation
- Patients enrolled in any other clinical studies the investigator believes to be in conflict with this clinical investigation.
- Patients who are pregnant or nursing
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: FLASH radiotherapy for painful bone metastasis(-es)
|
FLASH radiotherapy is radiation treatment delivered at ultra-high dose rates compared to conventional radiation treatment.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Workflow Feasibility
Time Frame: Will be assessed on day of treatment delivery which occurs within 3 weeks of subject enrollment.
|
Number of participants with total time on table under one hour. The investigational site staff will measure the time for participant set-up and positioning on the treatment couch, imaging and FLASH treatment delivery. The workflow feasibility outcome measure is met for an individual subject if total time on table is measured as less than one hour. The outcome measure data table provides the mean and full range of time on table (as measured in minutes) for the 10 participants. The participant with a treatment time of 33 minutes received treatment to two separate metastatic sites; remaining 9 participants received treatment to a single metastatic site. |
Will be assessed on day of treatment delivery which occurs within 3 weeks of subject enrollment.
|
|
Workflow Feasibility
Time Frame: Will be assessed within 4 weeks of subject enrollment.
|
Number of participants whose treatment was delayed by more than 7 business days from simulation to treatment when related to the investigational device (excluding delays due to patient or facility factors not related to study treatment). The investigational site staff will measure the number of days delay in time to treatment due to problems involving the investigational device. The workflow feasibility outcome measure is met for an individual subject if the delay is measured as less than 7 days. The outcome measure data table provides the mean and full range days of treatment delay for the 10 participants. |
Will be assessed within 4 weeks of subject enrollment.
|
|
Assessment of Radiation-related Toxicities That Are Possibly, Probably, or Definitely Related to FLASH Radiotherapy.
Time Frame: Assessed from start of treatment until subject death or lost to follow-up, up to 17.8 months
|
Toxicities that are possibly, probably, or definitely related to FLASH radiotherapy. Toxicities will be classified per CTCAE version 5.0. The outcome measure data table summarizes the total number of adverse events possibly, probably, definitely related to treatment that were reported in the 10 participant cohort. Eleven adverse events were grade 1 and one adverse event was grade 2, as classified by CTCAE version 5.0. |
Assessed from start of treatment until subject death or lost to follow-up, up to 17.8 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain Relief
Time Frame: At 3 month follow up
|
Percentage of treated sites achieving pain relief as measured using patient reported outcome questionnaires (Brief Pain Inventory Questionnaire, Treated Sites Pain Questionnaire). Categories of pain relief included complete, partial, stable or progressive response. Complete response (CR) = no pain at 3 months Partial response (PR) = an average pain score that is ≥2 points lower than initial Stable disease (SD) = an average pain score that is ±1 point change from initial Progressive disease (PD) = an average pain score that is ≥2 points higher than initial |
At 3 month follow up
|
|
Number of Participants Who Experienced a Pain Flare.
Time Frame: First 10 days post FLASH treatment
|
Pain was assessed by patient reported validated 10 point pain flare questionnaire.
Pain flare is defined as either of the following: A) a minimum of a two-point increase in the worst pain score for the treated site without a reduction in analgesic intake; or B) a 25% or greater increase in analgesic intake based on daily oral morphine equivalence without a reduction in the worst pain score.
|
First 10 days post FLASH treatment
|
|
Number of Participants With Increased Use of Pain Medication in First 10 Days Post FLASH Treatment
Time Frame: Within 10 days after treatment.
|
Use of pain medication by study participant during days 1-10 following FLASH treatment was collected as it constituted one of the defining criteria (criteria B) for the pain flare outcome measure. Pain flare is defined as either of the following: A) a minimum of a two-point increase in the worst pain score for the treated site without a reduction in analgesic intake; or B) a 25% or greater increase in analgesic intake based on daily oral morphine equivalence without a reduction in the worst pain score. |
Within 10 days after treatment.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: John Breneman, MD, Professor of Radiation Oncology and Neurosurgery, UCMC
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Maity A, Koumenis C. Shining a FLASHlight on Ultrahigh Dose-Rate Radiation and Possible Late Toxicity. Clin Cancer Res. 2022 Sep 1;28(17):3636-3638. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-1255.
- Mascia AE, Daugherty EC, Zhang Y, Lee E, Xiao Z, Sertorio M, Woo J, Backus LR, McDonald JM, McCann C, Russell K, Levine L, Sharma RA, Khuntia D, Bradley JD, Simone CB 2nd, Perentesis JP, Breneman JC. Proton FLASH Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Symptomatic Bone Metastases: The FAST-01 Nonrandomized Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2023 Jan 1;9(1):62-69. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.5843. Erratum In: JAMA Oncol. 2023 May 1;9(5):728. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.0218.
- Daugherty EC, Mascia A, Zhang Y, Lee E, Xiao Z, Sertorio M, Woo J, McCann C, Russell K, Levine L, Sharma R, Khuntia D, Bradley J, Simone CB 2nd, Perentesis J, Breneman J. FLASH Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Symptomatic Bone Metastases (FAST-01): Protocol for the First Prospective Feasibility Study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Jan 5;12:e41812. doi: 10.2196/41812.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- VAR-2019-02
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Bone Metastasis
-
American University of Beirut Medical CenterNot yet recruitingBone Metastasis | Bone Pain FlareLebanon
-
Hoffmann-La RocheCompletedPain; Bone Neoplasms; Neoplasm MetastasisBulgaria
-
MedtronicNeuroCompletedMetastasis Spine | Metastasis to BoneUnited States, Luxembourg, Germany, France, Canada
-
Kathy MillerTerminatedBone Cancer | MetastasisUnited States
-
TheraclionCompleted
-
IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di BolognaRecruiting
-
Tools4PatientCompletedBone MetastasisBelgium, France
-
Hoffmann-La RocheCompletedPain; Bone Neoplasms; Neoplasm MetastasisBulgaria
-
Istituto Ortopedico RizzoliCompletedMetastasis Lung | Bone NeoplasmItaly
-
Institut Jean-GodinotCompletedComparison of NaF PET-CT and Diffusion MRI in the Diagnosis of Bone Metastases (IMMETAOS) (IMMETAOS)Cancer | Bone Metastasis
Clinical Trials on FLASH Radiotherapy
-
Jules Bordet InstituteNot yet recruitingBasal Cell Carcinoma (BCC) | Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma (CSCC)Belgium
-
Varian, a Siemens Healthineers CompanyActive, not recruitingBone Metastases in the ThoraxUnited States
-
University of ZurichVarian, a Siemens Healthineers CompanyActive, not recruiting
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire VaudoisRecruitingMetastasis From Malignant Melanoma of Skin (Diagnosis)Switzerland
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire VaudoisActive, not recruitingBasal Cell Carcinoma | Cutaneous Squamous Cell CarcinomaSwitzerland
-
Trauma Institute & Child Trauma InstituteUnknown
-
Trauma Institute & Child Trauma InstituteUnknownTrauma, Psychological | Motor Vehicle AccidentUnited States
-
Campus Bio-Medico UniversityActive, not recruiting
-
University of Lausanne HospitalsUniversity Hospital, GenevaCompleted