Glaucoma Screening Using Dynamic Analysis of Computerized Pupillary Light Reflex Assessment Device

May 5, 2021 updated by: Chun Zhang, Peking University

Glaucoma Screening Using Dynamic Analysis of Computerized Pupillary Light Reflex Assessment Device Via Iris Recognition Techniques

To explore an effective diagnostic tool of glaucoma through the dynamic analysis of computerized pupillary light reflex assessment device (CPLRAD) pupillography based on iris recognition techniques and investigate its feasibility in glaucoma screening.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide, which is characterized by progressive loss of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) and their optic nerve axons. Early diagnosis and treatment can effectively prevent the progression of the disease and avoid blindness. The damage of RGCs appears in the early stage of glaucoma, and the asymmetry of the eyes has also been observed clinically. CPLRAD may serve as an effective screening tool for glaucomatous optic neuropathy, since they can dynamically detect abnormal pupillary responses from a novel sequence of light stimuli and functionally-shaped stimuli. The current theoretical evidence of relative afferent pupillary defect/pupillary light reflex (RAPD/PLR) as a functional test for predicting nerve damage is insufficient, and pupil detection technology is not yet mature. Therefore, the investigators want to complete these tasks: 1) collect the clinical examination data and objectively measure the pupil dynamic parameters monocularly and/or binocularly as indicators from the retina and optic nerve in glaucoma patients 2) design RAPD/PLR detection technology and develop dynamic analysis system; 3) verify the feasibility of RAPD/PLR applied to early glaucoma screening through clinical trials. The pupil image dynamic analysis and iris recognition system will provide a simple, inexpensive and non-invasive screen tool, and is highly reliable and cost-effective.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100191
        • Recruiting
        • Peking University Third Hosipital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All participants are recruited from patients visiting at the Ophthalmologic Center of Peking University Third Hospital and from the general population through advertisements.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • with open angles on gonioscopy
  • best-corrected visual acuity ≥0.5
  • spherical refraction within ±6.0 diopters (D), and cylinder correction within 3.0 D

Exclusion Criteria:

  • eyes with any evidence of physical abnormality of the iris or pupils on slit-lamp examination
  • eyes with a history of trauma or inflammation
  • undergone an intraocular surgery or laser within the previous 6 months /except uncomplicated cataract surgery
  • using systemic or topical medications that could affect pupil responses, including pilocarpine or atropine
  • presence of any media opacities that prevented good quality optical coherence tomography (OCT) or fundus images
  • presence of any retinal or neurological disease other than glaucoma abnormal ocular motility that prevents binocular fixation (eg, nystagmus, strabismus)
  • with severe system diseases or psychiatric disorders

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Normal Subjects
Healthy eyes had intraocular pressure of less than 22 mmHg with no history of increased intraocular pressure and normal standard automated perimetry (SAP) results.
CPLRAD may serve as an effective screening tool for glaucomatous optic neuropathy, since they can dynamically detect abnormal pupillary responses from a novel sequence of light stimuli and functionally-shaped stimuli. CPLRAD can collect the clinical examination data and objectively measure the pupil dynamic parameters monocularly and/or binocularly as indicators from the retina and optic nerve in glaucoma patients.
Suspect Glaucoma
Eyes with suspect glaucoma were defined as those with suspicious neuroretinal rim thinning or retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) defects on masked stereophotographic assessment, without repeatable abnormal SAP results. Eyes with suspect glaucoma also included those with intraocular pressure (IOP) > 21 mm Hg but with healthy-appearing optic discs and without repeatable abnormal SAP results
CPLRAD may serve as an effective screening tool for glaucomatous optic neuropathy, since they can dynamically detect abnormal pupillary responses from a novel sequence of light stimuli and functionally-shaped stimuli. CPLRAD can collect the clinical examination data and objectively measure the pupil dynamic parameters monocularly and/or binocularly as indicators from the retina and optic nerve in glaucoma patients.
Primary Open Angle Glaucoma, early stage
Eyes were classified as glaucomatous if they had repeatable (≥2 consecutive) abnormal SAP(Humphrey) test results or progressive glaucomatous changes on masked grading of stereophotographs, with or without abnormal SAP results. Abnormal SAP results were defined by a pattern standard deviation outside the 95% confidence limits or glaucoma hemifield test results outside the reference range.( -0.01dB≤MD≤-6.00dB)
CPLRAD may serve as an effective screening tool for glaucomatous optic neuropathy, since they can dynamically detect abnormal pupillary responses from a novel sequence of light stimuli and functionally-shaped stimuli. CPLRAD can collect the clinical examination data and objectively measure the pupil dynamic parameters monocularly and/or binocularly as indicators from the retina and optic nerve in glaucoma patients.
Primary Open Angle Glaucoma, moderate stage
Eyes were classified as glaucomatous if they had repeatable (≥2 consecutive) abnormal SAP(Humphrey) test results or progressive glaucomatous changes on masked grading of stereophotographs, with or without abnormal SAP results. Abnormal SAP results were defined by a pattern standard deviation outside the 95% confidence limits or glaucoma hemifield test results outside the reference range.( -6.01≤MD≤-12.00dB)
CPLRAD may serve as an effective screening tool for glaucomatous optic neuropathy, since they can dynamically detect abnormal pupillary responses from a novel sequence of light stimuli and functionally-shaped stimuli. CPLRAD can collect the clinical examination data and objectively measure the pupil dynamic parameters monocularly and/or binocularly as indicators from the retina and optic nerve in glaucoma patients.
Primary Open Angle Glaucoma, advanced stage
Eyes were classified as glaucomatous if they had repeatable (≥2 consecutive) abnormal SAP(Humphrey) test results or progressive glaucomatous changes on masked grading of stereophotographs, with or without abnormal SAP results. Abnormal SAP results were defined by a pattern standard deviation outside the 95% confidence limits or glaucoma hemifield test results outside the reference range.( -12.00≤MD≤-20.00dB)
CPLRAD may serve as an effective screening tool for glaucomatous optic neuropathy, since they can dynamically detect abnormal pupillary responses from a novel sequence of light stimuli and functionally-shaped stimuli. CPLRAD can collect the clinical examination data and objectively measure the pupil dynamic parameters monocularly and/or binocularly as indicators from the retina and optic nerve in glaucoma patients.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Maximum Constriction Velocity in One Eye in Different Groups
Time Frame: The test of each participant will complete the all procedures within 1 hour.
The maximum constriction velocity will be calculated by the software
The test of each participant will complete the all procedures within 1 hour.
Maximum Dilation Velocity in One Eye in Different Groups
Time Frame: The test of each participant will complete the all procedures within 1 hour.
The maximum dilation velocity will be calculated by the software.
The test of each participant will complete the all procedures within 1 hour.
Pupil Constriction Amplitude(ratio) in One Eye in Different Groups
Time Frame: The test of each participant will complete the all procedures within 1 hour.
The pupil constriction amplitude(ratio) will be calculated by the software.
The test of each participant will complete the all procedures within 1 hour.
Baseline Pupil Size in One Eye in Different Groups
Time Frame: The test of each participant will complete the all procedures within 1 hour.
The baseline pupil size is measured before the stimulus on.
The test of each participant will complete the all procedures within 1 hour.
Baseline Pupil Size(BPZ) Asymmetry between Two Eyes in Different Groups
Time Frame: The test of each participant will complete the all procedures within 1 hour.

Asymmetry is calculated by a formula:

RAPD score of BPZ= 10 * log10 (baseline pupil size in right eye/baseline pupil size in left eye)

The test of each participant will complete the all procedures within 1 hour.
Maximum Constriction Velocity(MCV) Asymmetry between Two Eyes in Different Groups
Time Frame: The test of each participant will complete the all procedures within 1 hour.

Asymmetry is calculated by a formula:

RAPD score of MCV= 10 * log10 (maximum constriction velocity in right eye/maximum constriction velocity in left eye)

The test of each participant will complete the all procedures within 1 hour.
Maximum Dilation Velocity(MDV) Asymmetry between Two Eyes in Different Groups
Time Frame: The test of each participant will complete the all procedures within 1 hour.

Asymmetry is calculated by a formula:

RAPD score of MDV = 10 * log10 (maximum dilation velocity in right eye/maximum dilation velocity in left eye)

The test of each participant will complete the all procedures within 1 hour.
Pupil Constriction Amplitude(ratio) Asymmetry between Two Eyes in Different Groups
Time Frame: The test of each participant will complete the all procedures within 1 hour.

Amplitude(ratio) is calculated by: (DIAMETER resting-DIAMETER constricted) / DIAMETER resting

Asymmetry was calculated by a formula:

RAPD score of Amplitude = 10 * log10 (pupil constriction amplitude in right eye/pupil constriction amplitude in left eye)

The test of each participant will complete the all procedures within 1 hour.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Chun Zhang, MD/PHD, Peking University Third Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 30, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

April 30, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 10, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 18, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

October 20, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 7, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 5, 2021

Last Verified

May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB00006761-M2020269

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Primary Open Angle Glaucoma

Clinical Trials on Computerized pupillary light reflex assessment device

3
Subscribe