Cognition, Pain and Wellbeing (CPW)

November 2, 2020 updated by: Ana Valdes, University of Nottingham

The Link Between Cognitive Function and Chronic Pain: An Observational Cohort Study

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common form of arthritis and for 4 in 10 people pain from OA is not adequately controlled. The pain experience of people suffering from chronic pain largely depends on their individual perception of pain and on brain functions, in particular what is called "cognitive" functions. Cognitive functions include memory, attention, organisation and planning, task initiation, regulation of emotions and reflection of oneself and are important for everyday tasks, such as following a conversation or a story in a book or on TV, learning new things, remembering old and new information and making decisions. Good cognition predicts the risk of developing chronic pain after a painful event, such as surgery. Chronic pain patients report numerous cognitive impairments, with attention and memory being the two most prominent that can persist even after the original cause of pain has been treated. Little evidence exists regarding the nature and magnitude of these deficits and their underlying brain and psychological mechanisms in chronic knee OA. The investigators want to understand which cognitive functions and to what extent are associated with pain in patients with knee OA.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common form of arthritis and for 4 in 10 people pain from OA is not adequately controlled. The pain experience of people suffering from chronic pain largely depends on their individual perception of pain and on brain functions, in particular what is called "cognitive" functions. Cognitive functions include memory, attention, organisation and planning, task initiation, regulation of emotions and reflection of oneself and are important for everyday tasks, such as following a conversation or a story in a book or on TV, learning new things, remembering old and new information and making decisions. Good cognition predicts the risk of developing chronic pain after a painful event, such as surgery. Chronic pain patients report numerous cognitive impairments, with attention and memory being the two most prominent that can persist even after the original cause of pain has been treated. Little evidence exists regarding the nature and magnitude of these deficits and their underlying brain and psychological mechanisms in chronic knee OA. The investigators want to understand which cognitive functions and to what extent are associated with pain in patients with knee OA. Identifying specific domains of cognitive function affected by chronic pain has a clinical utility; specific domains regulate certain aspects of activities of daily living, such as managing personal finances, grocery shopping, remembering to take medications and, thus, dealing with pain early in the disease course could prevent subsequent cognitive loss and long-term pain. To do this the investigators will examine the link between measures of pain and measures of cognition in people with knee OA. The investigators propose to measure knee pain, physical function, sleep quality and overall wellbeing with questionnaires and pain sensitivity measures. The investigators will measure cognition with questionnaires and computer-based tasks testing aspects of cognitive function, including memory and attention. The investigators will compare the questionnaire and pain sensitivity measures with questionnaire and measures of cognitive function in the same participants. The investigators will include tests of various aspects of a person's memory that will facilitate the establishment of which aspects are related to chronic pain. The investigators hypothesise that chronic pain is linked to specific cognitive deficits in patients with knee OA and managing pain, for example, with mild to moderate targeted exercise and healthy diet, may limit the risk of memory loss and dementia and, in turn, predict better treatment outcomes.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Participants will be recruited from previous studies undertaken by the Academic Rheumatology, University of Nottingham, who have expressed an interest in future research. Responders from the Investigating Musculoskeletal Health and Wellbeing cohort study (IMHWCS, n ~ 5,000) and Knee Pain and related health In the Community cohort study (KPIC, n ~ 3,000) will be sent an invitation letter and participant information sheet (PIS) with details about the Cognition, Pain and Wellbeing study. A telephone screening will be then done to confirm their eligibility for the study and their interest in participating and they will be booked an appointment for a single visit in Academic Rheumatology.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 40 years and onward
  • Able to read and write English
  • Have English as their first language

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Persons who do not adequately understand verbal explanations of written information in English, or who have special communication needs or whose English is not their first language
  • Dialysis patients or on home oxygen
  • Terminal illness
  • Serious mental illness
  • Dementia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Healthy controls
Participants with the relevant condition

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain sensitivity measures
Time Frame: Conducted once, at assessment visit approximately 10 minutes
Quantitative sensory testing (QST) will be used to assess pain sensitivity with measures, such as pressure pain threshold (PPT). PPT is a valid measure of tenderness around the knee. QST is used to quantify pain perception and it is an objective measure of peripheral sensitisation (increased tenderness around the knee) and central sensitisation (increased pain perception in areas away from the knee). QST will be used to identify different pain phenotypes among participants and it will enable us to quantify peripheral and central sensitisation components of pain. Pain phenotypes will be then correlated to cognitive measures.
Conducted once, at assessment visit approximately 10 minutes
Pain sensitivity measures
Time Frame: Conducted once, at assessment visit approximately 4 minutes
Quantitative sensory testing (QST) will be used to assess pain sensitivity with measures, such as temporal summation (TS), TS is a measure of central sensitization. QST is used to quantify pain perception and it is an objective measure of peripheral sensitisation (increased tenderness around the knee) and central sensitisation (increased pain perception in areas away from the knee). QST will be used to identify different pain phenotypes among participants and it will enable us to quantify peripheral and central sensitisation components of pain. Pain phenotypes will be then correlated to cognitive measures.
Conducted once, at assessment visit approximately 4 minutes
Pain sensitivity measures
Time Frame: Conducted once, at assessment visit approximately 6 minutes
Quantitative sensory testing (QST) will be used to assess pain sensitivity with measures, such as conditioned pain modulation (CPM). CPM assesses the function of endogenous pain inhibitory pathways. QST is used to quantify pain perception and it is an objective measure of peripheral sensitisation (increased tenderness around the knee) and central sensitisation (increased pain perception in areas away from the knee). QST will be used to identify different pain phenotypes among participants and it will enable us to quantify peripheral and central sensitisation components of pain. Pain phenotypes will be then correlated to cognitive measures.
Conducted once, at assessment visit approximately 6 minutes
Pain severity measure
Time Frame: Conducted once, at assessment visit : approximately 5-10 minutes
The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), which is a self-administered 24 items questionnaire with three subscales assessing pain, stiffness and physical function, is an extensively utilised tool for the evaluation of hip and knee OA and will be used in the current study.
Conducted once, at assessment visit : approximately 5-10 minutes
Cognitive function
Time Frame: Conducted once, at assessment visit : approximately 40 minutes
Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) (objective measure) including tests of prefrontal-dependent sustained visual attention (Rapid Visual Information Processing, RVP, 7 min), attentional set shifting (Intra-/ Extra- Dimensional Set Shift, IED, 7 min) and hippocampus-dependent paired associate learning (Visual Learning Paired Associates Learning, PAL, 8 min) will be used. Other CANTAB tests will be included for comparison (reaction time test, RTI, 3 min; Stroop-like test, MTT, 8 min; spatial working memory test, SWM, 4 min).
Conducted once, at assessment visit : approximately 40 minutes
Cognitive function
Time Frame: Conducted once, at assessment visit approximately 8 minutes
Questionnaire cognitive measures, including the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) will be used.
Conducted once, at assessment visit approximately 8 minutes
Cognitive function
Time Frame: Conducted once, at assessment visit approximately 7 minutes
Questionnaire cognitive measures including the Cognitive reflection test (CRT) will be used.
Conducted once, at assessment visit approximately 7 minutes
Neuropathic pain quality: PD-Q
Time Frame: Conducted once, at assessment visit : approximately 5-10 minutes
The PainDETECT Questionnaire (PD-Q) is a self-report questionnaire developed to discriminate between nociceptive and neuropathic pain. It has been further modified (mPDQ) for use among specific pain groups, for example, knee pain. Neuropathic pain symptoms as identified with the mPDQ have been found to correlate with signs of central sensitisation in OA, as identified with QST.
Conducted once, at assessment visit : approximately 5-10 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Premorbid IQ
Time Frame: Conducted once, at assessment visit approximately 10-15 minutes
The National Adult Reading Test (NART) will serve as a measure of general premorbid IQ.
Conducted once, at assessment visit approximately 10-15 minutes
Depression/Anxiety
Time Frame: Conducted once, at assessment visit approximately 5-10 minutes
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), a 14-item measure designed to assess anxiety and depression symptoms will be also used.
Conducted once, at assessment visit approximately 5-10 minutes
Sleep Quality: PSQI
Time Frame: Conducted once, at assessment visit approximately 5-10 minutes
Sleep disturbances are common within people experiencing chronic pain and are associated with impaired cognitive function both in males and females. For that reason, the Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) will be utilised to assess sleeping patterns in people with chronic pain.
Conducted once, at assessment visit approximately 5-10 minutes
Physical function
Time Frame: Conducted once, at assessment visit approximately 6 minutes
Functionality testing will be done using the 'time up and go' (TUG) test.
Conducted once, at assessment visit approximately 6 minutes
Physical function
Time Frame: Conducted once, at assessment visit approximately 5 minutes
Functionality testing will be done using the 30-second sit to stand test (30CST)
Conducted once, at assessment visit approximately 5 minutes
Altruism/Decision making
Time Frame: Conducted once, at assessment visit approximately 5-10 minutes
Participants will also complete a Dictator Game (DG) to explore the role of altruism in motivating subjects' behaviour in two independent settings, whereby participants will be given money (£10) and can donate some, all or none to: 1. an anonymous participant (75) and 2. a charity organisation.
Conducted once, at assessment visit approximately 5-10 minutes
Body mass index (BMI)
Time Frame: Conducted once, at assessment visit approximately 5 minutes
Clinical assessment of body weight and height to determine BMI.
Conducted once, at assessment visit approximately 5 minutes
Inflammatory biomarkers
Time Frame: Conducted once, at assessment visit approximately 5-15 minutes for blood collection.
Blood samples will be collected and serum sent for laboratory analysis to determine inflammatory biomarkers using RNA tubes.
Conducted once, at assessment visit approximately 5-15 minutes for blood collection.
biomarkers of insulin resistance
Time Frame: Once pre-assessment visit Urine sample will be collected at home and handed in at attendance of the visit 5 minutes
Urine samples will be collected and sent for laboratory analysis to determine biomarkers of insulin resistance
Once pre-assessment visit Urine sample will be collected at home and handed in at attendance of the visit 5 minutes
gut microbiome measures.
Time Frame: Once post-assessment visit Faecal samples will be done home and sent back in prepaid envelope. 15 minutes
Faecal (optional) samples will be collected and sent for laboratory analysis to determine gut microbiome measures.
Once post-assessment visit Faecal samples will be done home and sent back in prepaid envelope. 15 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

November 7, 2019

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

April 1, 2022

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

April 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 22, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 2, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

November 9, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

November 9, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 2, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Knee Osteoarthritis

3
Subscribe