Diagnostic Performance Evaluation Study of the Xpert® Bladder Cancer Monitor Test. (Xpert Bladder)

February 8, 2021 updated by: Clinique Beau Soleil

Diagnostic Performance Evaluation Study of the Xpert® Bladder Cancer Monitor Test in the Surveillance of Patients With Non-Invasive Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma.

Non-muscle invasive bladder tumor is a condition that can recur with a risk of progression to an infiltrating tumor of the muscle. Regular follow-up is therefore essential to detect any recurrence or progression of the disease as early as possible.

Currently, the monitoring of this type of tumor is done by cystoscopy (examination that allows visualization of the bladder wall) associated with urinary cytology (analysis of urine to detect an abnormality). These examinations have their limits, they may not detect certain types of tumors or may be painful.

To reduce the number of cystoscopies and replace urinary cytology, several urinary markers have been developed in recent years. This is the case of the Xpert® Bladder Cancer Monitor test, which is a non-invasive, in vitro diagnostic urine test dedicated to the monitoring of patients with bladder cancer.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the Xpert® Bladder Cancer Monitor test for the detection of bladder tumor recurrence, compared to reference tests.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study consists of a urine sample. During the participant's medical consultation with his/her urologist, for the monitoring of his/her non-invasive bladder tumor(s), a cystoscopy is performed. Before the examination, the participant gives a urine sample, which will be analyzed by the Xpert®Bladder Cancer Monitor test.

The main objective of this non-interventional monocentric study is to compare the sensitivity of the Xpert® Bladder Cancer Monitor test performed on the GeneXpert® system to the sensitivity of cytology.

The reference test is a combination of cystoscopy and histology. The algorithm is as follows: if the cystoscopy is negative, it will be considered that there is no recurrence; if the cystoscopy is positive, a biopsy of the "abnormal" area will be performed and histology will be requested. If the histology is positive, it will be considered that there is a recurrence; otherwise, it will be considered that there is no recurrence.

The gold standard is, therefore, the couple: cystoscopy +/- histology

  • A cystoscopy will be considered positive if to the naked eye the urologist sees a macroscopically suspicious lesion (e.g. a budding lesion).
  • If the cystoscopy is positive, the urologist will take a sample of the suspect lesion and have it analyzed by the pathologist. If the lesion analyzed has the same histology as the original lesion, it will be considered a recurrence.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

320

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Hérault
      • Montpellier, Hérault, France, 34070
        • Clinique Beau Soleil

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

A person with antecedents of non-invasive bladder tumors and who has had previous transurethral resection of bladder tumor.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participant has a social security scheme.
  • Participant has signed a form of no objection to the use of the data.
  • Participant has had a transurethral resection of bladder tumor revealing non-invasive-muscle bladder tumor prior to inclusion within a maximum of 5 years from the date of diagnosis to the absence of recurrence since then.
  • Participant is seen for a follow-up cystoscopy on the day of the visit.

Non-Inclusion Criteria:

  • Vulnerable persons (Article L 1121-6 of the Public Health Code).
  • Adults subject to legal protection or unable to express their consent (Article 1121-8 of the Public Health Code).
  • Persons with a bladder tumor other than a non-invasive bladder tumor (i.e., invasive bladder cancer).
  • A person who has undergone bladder tumor resection or therapy with Calmette-Guerin bacilli or with Mitomycin C less than 6 weeks (42 days) prior to inclusion.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Participant no longer wishing to participate in the study, or in the course of the study with a refusal to use the data until exit from the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Xpert® Bladder Test
A urine sample is collected before cystoscopy.
The urine sample is analyzed with the Xpert® Bladder Cancer Monitor test.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Compare sensitivities of the Xpert® Bladder Cancer Monitor Test and the urinary cytology test.
Time Frame: 12 months
The two tests, the Xpert® Bladder Cancer Monitor and the urinary cytology, made during the follow-up of patients with non-invasive-muscle bladder tumor are compared to the gold standard, which is the reference examination: the couple cystoscopy/histology.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the Xpert® Bladder Cancer Monitor test.
Time Frame: 12 months
Evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the Xpert® Bladder Cancer Monitor test for the detection of bladder tumor recurrence (stage, grade).
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mohamed Trabelssi, M.D., Clinique Beau Soleil

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 22, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 15, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

January 2, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 23, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 23, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

December 1, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 9, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 8, 2021

Last Verified

February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2018-A03392-53

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Non-Invasive Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on Xpert® Bladder Cancer Monitor Test

3
Subscribe