PENK Methylation Test for Detecting Bladder Cancer

October 1, 2023 updated by: In Gab Jeong, MD, Asan Medical Center

A Multicenter, Single-blind, Prospective Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Clinical Performance of EarlyTect® Bladder Cancer Test in the Urine DNA for Detecting Bladder Cancer Among Hematuria Patients

The primary objective of this clinical trial is to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the EarlyTect® Bladder Cancer test for bladder cancer among patients with hematuria by comparing it to the results of cystoscopy examinations.

The second objective is to compare the clinical performance of EarlyTect® Bladder Cancer test with a NMP22 test and urine cytology test with respect to bladder cancer. By histopathological examination, lesions identified during cystoscopy will be confirmed as malignant or non-malignant by histological examination.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

Patients with hematuria who are scheduled for cystoscopy will be asked to collect a urine sample for EarlyTect® Bladder Cancer test and will undergo NMP22 and urine cytology tests. The participants will undergo a cystoscopy within 30 days of enrollment. For confirmation of the diagnosis and stage of the tumor, representative histopathology slides from TURBT (Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumors) may be retrieved and examined by the central pathology laboratory.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

1549

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 05505
        • Recruiting
        • Asan Medical Center
        • Contact:
          • In Gab Jeong, MD PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with hematuria

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals who agree to voluntarily sign an informed consent prior to the initiation of screening
  • Adults aged ≥40
  • Subjects who have had gross or microscopic hematuria within the 3 months
  • Subjects who had no history of bladder cancer and upper tract urothelial cancer
  • Subjects who will undergo cystoscopy, NMP22 test, and urine cytology within 1 month after consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals who do not agree to voluntarily sign an informed consent prior to the initiation of screening
  • Subjects aged <40 years
  • Subjects with a history of bladder cancer and upper tract urothelial cancer
  • Female who are currently menstruating or who have had their last menstrual period within the last 3 days
  • Subjects who have undergone invasive procedures in the urinary tract system within the last 3 months
  • Subjects with suspected upper urothelial cancer lesions on ultrasound or CT scan
  • Subjects who have previously received pelvic radiation therapy
  • Subjects who have been diagnosed with other cancers and have received or are currently receiving chemotherapy or immunotherapy within 6 months
  • Subjects who require treatment for an active urinary tract infection or vaginitis
  • Subjects undergoing prostate cancer treatment or requiring a prostate biopsy
  • Subject has any condition which, in the opinion of the investigator should preclude participation in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Hematuria patients aged ≥40
Device: EarlyTect Bladder Cancer test, PENK methylation assay by LTE (Linear Target Enrichment)-qMSP (quantitative methylation-specific real time PCR)
A highly accurate and sensitive real-time PCR employing Linear Target Enrichment and Quantitative Methylation-Specific PCR (LTE-qMSP) for measuring PENK methylation in urine DNA to detect bladder cancer in hematuria patients.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity and specificity of the EarlyTect® Bladder Cancer test
Time Frame: 1 year

Sensitivity and specificity of the EarlyTect® Bladder Cancer test for detecting bladder cancer (Stages Ta high-grade and T1-T4) in patients with hematuria compared to the cystoscopy examination, both in terms of detecting bladder cancer. The reference method is the cystoscopic procedure, and lesions will be assessed histopathologically.

EarlyTect® Bladder Cancer test includes a measurement of PENK methylation and COL2A1 as a DNA control.

PENK methylation in urine DNA will be assessed quantitatively by Linear Target Enrichment-coupled Quantitative Methylation-Specific PCR (LTE-qMSP) using the Real-time PCR method. The results will be dichotomized by the CT (cycle threshold) cutoff value as either positive or negative. Sensitivity = 100*(positive PENK methylation test/positive cystoscopy), Specificity = 100*(negative PENK methylation test/negative cystoscopy).

1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The performance of the EarlyTect® Bladder Cancer test
Time Frame: 1 year
The performance of the EarlyTect® Bladder Cancer test in detecting Bladder cancer in hematuria patients will be compared with those of the NMP22 and urine cytology tests.
1 year

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of clinical sensitivity and specificity to the NMP22 test
Time Frame: 1 year
Comparison of clinical sensitivity and specificity to the NMP22 test
1 year
Comparison of clinical sensitivity and specificity to the urine cytology test
Time Frame: 1 year
Comparison of clinical sensitivity and specificity to the urine cytology test
1 year
Sensitivity of EarlyTect® Bladder Cancer test for detecting bladder cancer with stages CIS and Ta low-grade
Time Frame: 1 year
Sensitivity of EarlyTect® Bladder Cancer test for detecting bladder cancer with stages CIS and Ta low-grade
1 year
Positive predictive value (PPV) and Negative predictive value (NPV)
Time Frame: 1 year
Positive predictive value and negative predictive value of EarlyTect® Bladder Cancer test for detecting bladder cancer
1 year
Evaluation of clinical sensitivity and specificity in the combination of EarlyTect® Bladder Cancer and NMP22 tests
Time Frame: 1 year
Clinical sensitivity and specificity in the combination of EarlyTect® Bladder Cancer and NMP22 tests for detecting bladder cancer
1 year
Evaluation of clinical sensitivity and specificity in the combination of EarlyTect® Bladder Cancer and cytology tests
Time Frame: 1 year
Clinical sensitivity and specificity in the combination of EarlyTect® Bladder Cancer and cytology tests for detecting bladder cancer
1 year
Evaluation of clinical sensitivity and specificity in the combination of EarlyTect® Bladder Cancer, NMP22, and cytology tests
Time Frame: 1 year
Clinical sensitivity and specificity in the combination of EarlyTect® Bladder Cancer, NMP22, and cytology tests for detecting bladder cancer
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

  • 1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394-424. 2. Charpentier M, Gutierrez C, Guillaudeux T, Verhoest G, Pedeux R. Noninvasive urine-based tests to diagnose or detect recurrence of bladder cancer. Cancers. 2021;13:1650. 3. Freedman ND, Silverman DT, Hollenbeck AR, Schatzkin A, Abnet CC. Association between smoking and risk of bladder cancer among men and women. JAMA 2011; 306: 737-745. 4. Kitamura H, Kakehi Y. Treatment and management of high-grade T1 bladder cancer: what should we do after second TUR? Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2015;45(4):315-322. 5. Sievert KD, Amend B, Nagele U, Schilling D, Bedke J, Horstmann M et al. Economic aspects of bladder cancer: what are the benefits and costs? World J Urol. 2009;27(3):295-300. 6. Nepple KG, O'Donnell MA. The optimal management of T1 high-grade bladder cancer. Can Urol Assoc. 2009,3(suppl4):S188-92. 7. Wakui M, Shiigai T: Urinary tract cancer screening through analysis of urinary red blood cell volume distribution. Int J Urol. 2000,7(7):248-253. 8. Yafi FA, Aprikian AG, Tanguay S, Kassouf W. Patients with microscopic and gross hematuria: practice and referral patterns among primary care physicians in a universal health care system. Con Urol Assoc J. 2011;5(2):97-101. 9. Beukers W, Kandimalla R, van Houwelingen D, Kovacic H, Chin JF, Lingsma HF et al. The use of molecular analyses in voided urine for the assessment of patients with hematuria. PLOS One. 2013;8(10):e77657. 10. Chung W, Bondaruk J, Jelinek J, Lotan Y, Liang S, Czerniak B et al: Detection of bladder cancer using novel DNA methylation biomarkers in urine sediments. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011,20(7):1483-91. 11. Oeyen E, Hoekx L, Wachter SD, Baldewijins M, Ameye F, Mertens I. Bladder cancer diagnosis and follow-up: The current status and possible role of extracellular vesicels. Mol. Sci. 2019;20(4),821 12. Sullivan PS, Chan JB, Levin MR, Rao J. Urine cytology and adjunct markers for detection and surveillance of bladder cancer. Am J Transl Res. 2010;2(4):412-40. 13. Soria, F, Droller MJ, Lotan Y, Gontero P, D'Andrea D, Gust KM et al. An up-to-date catalog of available urinary biomarkers for the surveillance of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. World J Urol. 2018;36:1981-95. 14. Hajdijak T. UroVysion FISH test for detecting urothelial cancers: meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy and comparison with urinary cytology testing. Urol Oncol 2008;26(6):646-51. 15. Mbeutcha A, Lucca I, Mathieu R, Lotan Y, Shariat SF. Current status of urinary biomarkers for detection and surveillance of bladder cancer. Urol Clin N AM 2016;43:47-62 16. Chung W, Bondaruk J, Jelinek J, Lotan Y, Liang S, Czerniak B, Lssa JPJ. Detection of bladder cancer using novel DNA methylation biomarkers in urine sediments. Cancer Epidermiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20(7):1483-91

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 3, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 7, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 21, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

February 2, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 4, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 1, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bladder Cancer

Clinical Trials on EarlyTect® Bladder Cancer test

3
Subscribe