PMCF Study on the Safety, Performance and Clinical Benefits of the DVR Plating System

September 30, 2022 updated by: Zimmer Biomet

Post-market Clinical Follow-up Study to Provide Safety, Performance and Clinical Benefits Data of the DVR Plating System (Implant and Instrumentation) - A Retrospective Consecutive Series Study

The study is a single-center, retrospective, non-randomized, non-controlled and consecutive series post-market study. The purpose of this study is to confirm safety, performance and clinical benefits of the DVR Plates. The primary objective is the assessment of performance by analyzing fracture healing. The secondary objective is the assessment of safety by recording and analyzing the incidence and frequency of complications and adverse events.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Detailed Description

The DVR plating system in this study includes the DVR Crosslock Distal Radial Plate, the DVR Volar Rim Plate and the DVR Wrist Plates.

One site will be involved in this study. The aim is to include a total of 112 consecutive series patients treated between 2014 and 2018. All potential study subjects will be required to participate in the Informed Consent Process.

Baseline data from the preop, intraop, immediate post-op and last consultation visit will be available in medical notes and collected retrospectively. During a follow up phone call the patient will be asked to complete a patient questionnaire and a question on his/her wrist function. In addition, any complications since the last consultation visit at the clinic, information about and treatment of the complications will also be collected over the phone.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

112

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Southampton, United Kingdom
        • Southampton General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients must have received one of the DVR Plates and who meet all of the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All subjects must have been implanted with one of the DVR Plates according to the approved indications.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Off-label use.
  • Cases where there is an active infection.
  • Conditions which tend to retard healing such as, blood supply limitations, previous infections, etc.
  • Insufficient quantity or quality of bone to permit stabilization of the fracture.
  • Conditions that restrict the patient's ability or willingness to follow postoperative instructions during the healing process.
  • Foreign body sensitivity - where material sensitivity is suspected, appropriate tests should be conducted and sensitivity ruled out prior to implantations.
  • Cases where the implant(s) would cross open epiphyseal plates in skeletally immature patients.
  • Cases with malignant primary or metastatic tumors which preclude adequate bone support or screw fixations, unless supplemental fixation or stabilization methods are utilized.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Patients who received DVR Plating System

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fracture healing based on clinical measures and/or x-rays
Time Frame: From last consultation visit to follow-up phone call, 2-6 years
Fracture healing will be evaluated by x-rays and/or clinical measures (no pain at fracture site)
From last consultation visit to follow-up phone call, 2-6 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Product safety based on complication and adverse events
Time Frame: From operation to study completion, 2-6 years
Safety will be assessed by recording and analyzing the incidence and frequency of complications and adverse events
From operation to study completion, 2-6 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 12, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 3, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 19, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 26, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

December 4, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 3, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 30, 2022

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Distal Radius Fracture

3
Subscribe