Cardiac Output Optimization on Postoperative Complications in Major Hepatic Surgery (OPTILIVER)

April 8, 2024 updated by: Institut Paoli-Calmettes

Effect of an Individualized Protocol Based on Cardiac Output Optimization Guided by Dynamic Indices of Preload Responsiveness Monitoring on Postoperative Complications in Major Hepatic Surgery for Primary or Secondary Liver Cancer

Major hepatectomies are high-risk surgeries offered more and more frequently for the curative treatment of primary or secondary liver cancer, and for complex cases, representing a real challenge for medical teams. The 1st peroperative phase of "hepatic resection" requires a minimum supply of filling fluids to limit perioperative bleeding (Low Central Venous Pressure). However this strategy exposes the risk of organ hypoperfusion due to low cardiac flow, secondary to hypovolaemia, which may lead to ischemic situations favoring the onset of postoperative complications. On the other hand, the hemodynamic management of the 2nd peroperative phase "post hepatic resection" is marked by the need to correct this hypoperfusion by optimizing cardiac output by suitable vascular filling.

The major challenge is thus to restore cardiac output by refilling without excess, by correcting the hypovolemia that arose during the "post resection of the hepatic parenchyma" phase.

Our hypothesis is that an individualized protocol for optimizing intraoperative cardiac flow by guided vascular filling during the "post hepatic resection" phase is accompanied by a reduction in postoperative complications in patients operated on for major hepatic surgery.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

186

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥ 18 years old,
  2. Signature of consent,
  3. Any patient scheduled for major hepatic surgery (≥ 3 segments) scheduled by laparotomy, for primary hepatic cancer or secondary metastases,
  4. Affiliation to the ''National security'' regimen or beneficiary of this regimen.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Emergency surgery,
  2. Cirrhosis: depending on availability of CT and / or MRI imaging results, clinical examination, Biology (PT, Bilirubin) or histological results (preoperative biopsies in healthy liver)
  3. Portal hypertension: depending on availability of imaging data, history of esophageal varices
  4. Contraindication to fitting a tool for monitoring dynamic hemodynamic indices (case of esophageal varices for esophageal Doppler for example),
  5. Benign tumors,
  6. Associated procedures programmed at the same operating time (excluding hepatic surgery): programmed associated digestive resection (colorectal or pancreatic),
  7. Laparoscopy,
  8. Liver transplantation,
  9. Woman pregnant or likely to be (without effective contraception) or breastfeeding,
  10. Person in an emergency situation, adult person subject to a legal protection measure (adult under guardianship, guardianship or legal protection), or unable to express consent,
  11. Inability to undergo medical monitoring of the trial for geographical, social or psychological reasons.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Optimization of cardiac flow by base water-electrolyte supply
Optimization of cardiac flow by base water-electrolyte supply of 1 ml / kg / h by Ringer Lactate® and faced with any decrease of more than 10% of the VES compared to the reference VES, achievement of an optimization of the preload by administration of 250 ml of Ringer Lactate® with renewal until correction of the VES.
optimization of cardiac flow by base water-electrolyte supply of 1 ml / kg / h by Ringer Lactate® and faced with any decrease of more than 10% of the VES compared to the reference VES, achievement of an optimization of the preload by administration of 250 ml of Ringer Lactate® with renewal until correction of the VES.
Other: Control arm
Increase basic hydro-electrolyte supply of 6 ml / kg / h by Ringer Lactate® and 1: 1 blood loss compensation by crystalloids of the same nature.
increase basic hydro-electrolyte supply of 6 ml / kg / h by Ringer Lactate® and 1: 1 blood loss compensation by crystalloids of the same nature.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of the cardiac output optimization strategy on the occurrence of postoperative complications
Time Frame: From Day 1 to Day 30 post-surgery
Assessment of the impact of an individualized protocol for optimizing perioperative cardiac flow guided by monitoring of dynamic indices of preload dependence during the post-hepatic resection phase on the occurrence of postoperative complications in major hepatic surgery, for primary hepatic cancer or metastatic origin. We retain as the primary endpoint, the percentage of patients with at least one postoperative complication regardless of the grade in the Dindo-Clavien classification.
From Day 1 to Day 30 post-surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of grade III-IV postoperative complication in the Dindo-Clavien classification
Time Frame: From Day 1 to Day 30 post-surgery
To determine whether the strategy for optimizing cardiac output guided by dynamic dependence preload indices is associated with a difference in the incidence of occurrence of at least one grade III-IV postoperative complication in the Dindo-Clavien classification
From Day 1 to Day 30 post-surgery
Evaluation of length of stay in the hospital
Time Frame: From Day 1 to Day 30 post-surgery
To determine whether the cardiac output optimization strategy guided by the dynamic dependence preload indices is associated with a difference in the length of stay in the Continuing Care Unit, intensive care unit or length of hospital stay or on re-hospitalization rates
From Day 1 to Day 30 post-surgery
Evaluation of mortality
Time Frame: On Day 1, Day 30 and Day 90 post-surgery
To determine whether the cardiac output optimization strategy guided by the dynamic dependence preload indices is associated with a difference in mortality at D30 and D90
On Day 1, Day 30 and Day 90 post-surgery
Evaluation occurrence of organ failures
Time Frame: From Day 1 to Day 7 post-surgery
To determine whether the cardiac output optimization strategy guided by dynamic dependence preload indices has an impact on the occurrence of organ failures, which will be evaluated by the SOFA score per device from Day 1 to Day 7 postoperatively
From Day 1 to Day 7 post-surgery
Evaluation of hemodynamic parameters
Time Frame: From Day 0 to Day 1 post-surgery
To determine whether the cardiac output optimization strategy guided by dynamic dependence preload indices is associated with a difference on hemodynamic parameters
From Day 0 to Day 1 post-surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jean-Manuel de Guibert, MD, Institut Paoli-Calmettes

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 3, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 15, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 15, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 27, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

December 7, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 9, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 8, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • OPTILIVER TRIAL-IPC 2018-022

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Primary or Metastatic Hepatic Adenocarcinoma

Clinical Trials on Optimization of cardiac flow by base water-electrolyte supply

3
Subscribe