Aerobic Exercise for Primary Dysmenorrhea

December 7, 2020 updated by: The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Aerobic Exercise for Primary Dysmenorrhea: A Mixed-methods Study and Economic Evaluation

Primary dysmenorrhea is common and can result in significant disability for many women, causing a high degree of discomfort and reduced quality of life (QoL). Our preliminary studies suggested that high-intensity aerobic training (HIAT) for 30 minutes, three times a week at 70%-85% of maximum heart rate was effective for decreasing pain and improving QoL in women suffering from primary dysmenorrhea. However, to date, no studies have evaluated the beneficial effects of HIAT on academic performance and absenteeism or the cost-effectiveness of HIAT for women with primary dysmenorrhea. Furthermore, the mechanisms underlying aerobic exercise-induced analgesia in primary dysmenorrhea remain unclear.

Here, we propose a study to address this important knowledge gap by investigating the effects of HIAT on absenteeism and academic performance among university students with primary dysmenorrhea and examine the physiological mechanisms underlying aerobic exercise-induced analgesia by conducting a fully powered, randomised, controlled crossover trial. We also propose to conduct an economic evaluation to determine the cost-effectiveness of HIAT compared with a wait-listed control group receiving usual care, according to the societal and healthcare perspectives of Hong Kong. The results of this cutting-edge research will be important for clinicians, researchers, policymakers, and women with primary dysmenorrhea. The knowledge gained from the proposed study will be useful for researchers when designing future studies to identify the mediators of pain interventions for clinical improvements, which could themselves be the target of future interventions. The findings of the proposed study will inform decision-makers regarding the extent to which existing or standard and potential interventions can improve population health (effectiveness) and the resources required to implement these interventions (costs).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Objectives: (1): To evaluate the effectiveness of high-intensity aerobic training (HIAT) on pain intensity, absenteeism, and academic performance among university students with primary dysmenorrhea. (2): To investigate the physiological mechanism(s) underlying aerobic exercise-induced analgesia in women with primary dysmenorrhea. (3) Compare the cost-effectiveness of HIAT against that for usual care to treat pain associated with primary dysmenorrhea.

Design and subjects: A mixed-methods study, including a cross-over RCT, and semi-structured focus groups, alongside economic evaluation, will be conducted using 130 women with primary dysmenorrhea.

Interventions: Women will randomly allocated into high-intensity aerobic training (HIAT) or wait-list control (WLC) groups. Participants in the HIAT group will receive supervised treadmill training for the first 12 weeks of the trial. Following a four-week washout period the cross-over period will begin during Week 16, and the participants initially randomised to the WLC group will receive the HIAT regimen from Weeks 14-28. Participants initially randomized to HIAT group will be instructed not to engage in exercise during the remainder of the study period (i.e. Weeks 14-28).

Outcome measures: Pain intensity, absenteeism from university, academic performance, concentration, dysmenorrhea daily diary, and salivary progesterone and prostaglandin F2-alpha levels in saliva. The EQ-5D-3L will be used to determine the QoL for the HIAT and WLC groups.

Data analysis plan: A preliminary test using the independent samples t-test and a two-sided Student's unpaired t-test will be performed to rule out carryover effects and identify the within-participant differences in outcome variables between the study periods, respectively. Treatment effects will be evaluated using an ANOVA with a mixed-effects model considering the longitudinal repeated measures, including the effects of time within each study group and the interaction between time and intervention. The mediation effects will be assessed using the Sobel test. The EQ-5D responses will be converted into utility scores to estimate the gain or loss of quality-adjusted life-years (QUALYs). The seemingly unrelated regression (SUR) analyses will be used to estimate the total cost differences (ΔC) and effect differences (ΔE). Qualitative data will be analysed using the process of thematic analysis.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

130

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 24 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • women in the age group of 18-24 years old;
  • non-pregnant;
  • having regular menstrual cycles with cycle lengths between 24 and 30 days;
  • experiencing an average menstrual pain intensity equal to or greater than 5 on a 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale; and
  • scoring low (< 600 metabolic equivalent tasks [MET]/week) on the short-form of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • women using oral contraceptive pills, hormonal therapy, or intrauterine devices;
  • women using over-the counter analgesics during menstruation to treat dysmenorrhea-associated pain and experience no pain relief with those analgesics; and
  • women participating in any formal exercise programme

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: High-intensity aerobic training (HIAT)
Women will perform treadmill-based aerobic exercise for three days a week, at 70%-85% of MHR for 30 minutes and perceived exertion of 14-16, based on the Borg RPE scale. This range39 is considered to represent HIAT. Aerobic training will be preceded by warm-up exercises for 10 minutes and followed by cool-down exercises for 10 minutes, at a perceived exertion of 11.0 (Borg RPE).
Women will perform treadmill-based aerobic exercise for three days a week, at 70%-85% of MHR for 30 minutes and perceived exertion of 14-16, based on the Borg RPE scale. This range39 is considered to represent HIAT. Aerobic training will be preceded by warm-up exercises for 10 minutes and followed by cool-down exercises for 10 minutes, at a perceived exertion of 11.0 (Borg RPE).
Women in the wait-list control group will be instructed to continue with their usual activities and manage their pain as normal (i.e., with analgesics).
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Wait-list control (WLC)
Women in the wait-list control group will be instructed to continue with their usual activities and manage their pain as normal (i.e., with analgesics).
Women will perform treadmill-based aerobic exercise for three days a week, at 70%-85% of MHR for 30 minutes and perceived exertion of 14-16, based on the Borg RPE scale. This range39 is considered to represent HIAT. Aerobic training will be preceded by warm-up exercises for 10 minutes and followed by cool-down exercises for 10 minutes, at a perceived exertion of 11.0 (Borg RPE).
Women in the wait-list control group will be instructed to continue with their usual activities and manage their pain as normal (i.e., with analgesics).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain intensity
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (baseline, 0 week)
Average pain intensity during the last 24 hours during menstruation will be assessed using the 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale, with 0 representing 'No pain' and 10 representing 'Worst imaginable pain'. Higher scores indicate greater pain severity
Pre-intervention (baseline, 0 week)
Pain intensity
Time Frame: Post-intervention at 12 weeks
Average pain intensity during the last 24 hours during menstruation will be assessed using the 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale, with 0 representing 'No pain' and 10 representing 'Worst imaginable pain'. Higher scores indicate greater pain severity
Post-intervention at 12 weeks
Pain intensity
Time Frame: Post-intervention at 28 weeks
Average pain intensity during the last 24 hours during menstruation will be assessed using the 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale, with 0 representing 'No pain' and 10 representing 'Worst imaginable pain'. Higher scores indicate greater pain severity
Post-intervention at 28 weeks
Absenteeism from university
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (baseline, 0 week)
A prospective electronic diary will be provided for each participant to record university absenteeism.
Pre-intervention (baseline, 0 week)
Absenteeism from university
Time Frame: Post-intervention at 12 weeks
A prospective electronic diary will be provided for each participant to record university absenteeism.
Post-intervention at 12 weeks
Absenteeism from university
Time Frame: Post-intervention at 28 weeks
A prospective electronic diary will be provided for each participant to record university absenteeism.
Post-intervention at 28 weeks
Academic performance
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (baseline, 0 week)
Academic performance will be measured using the self-reported 20-item academic performance questionnaire, which was developed to measure the impacts of menstrual symptoms on academic performance. Greater scores indicate greater severity of primary dysmenorrhea
Pre-intervention (baseline, 0 week)
Academic performance
Time Frame: Post-intervention at 12 weeks
Academic performance will be measured using the self-reported 20-item academic performance questionnaire, which was developed to measure the impacts of menstrual symptoms on academic performance. Greater scores indicate greater severity of primary dysmenorrhea
Post-intervention at 12 weeks
Academic performance
Time Frame: Post-intervention at 28 weeks
Academic performance will be measured using the self-reported 20-item academic performance questionnaire, which was developed to measure the impacts of menstrual symptoms on academic performance. Greater scores indicate greater severity of primary dysmenorrhea
Post-intervention at 28 weeks
Progesterone levels
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (baseline, 0 week)
Salivary levels of progesterone.
Pre-intervention (baseline, 0 week)
Progesterone levels
Time Frame: Post-intervention at 12 weeks
Salivary levels of progesterone.
Post-intervention at 12 weeks
Progesterone levels
Time Frame: Post-intervention at 28 weeks
Salivary levels of progesterone.
Post-intervention at 28 weeks
Prostaglandin F2-alpha levels
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (baseline, 0 week)
Salivary levels of prostaglandin F2-alpha
Pre-intervention (baseline, 0 week)
Prostaglandin F2-alpha levels
Time Frame: Post-intervention at 12 weeks
Salivary levels of prostaglandin F2-alpha
Post-intervention at 12 weeks
Prostaglandin F2-alpha levels
Time Frame: Post-intervention at 28 weeks
Salivary levels of prostaglandin F2-alpha
Post-intervention at 28 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Concentration
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (baseline, 0 week)
The 0-10 visual analogue scale will be used to measure the impact of dysmenorrhea on concentration, with 0 representing 'No difficulty concentrating' and 10 representing 'Maximum difficulty concentrating'.
Pre-intervention (baseline, 0 week)
Concentration
Time Frame: Post-intervention at 12 weeks
The 0-10 visual analogue scale will be used to measure the impact of dysmenorrhea on concentration, with 0 representing 'No difficulty concentrating' and 10 representing 'Maximum difficulty concentrating'.
Post-intervention at 12 weeks
Concentration
Time Frame: Post-intervention at 28 weeks
The 0-10 visual analogue scale will be used to measure the impact of dysmenorrhea on concentration, with 0 representing 'No difficulty concentrating' and 10 representing 'Maximum difficulty concentrating'.
Post-intervention at 28 weeks
Dysmenorrhea daily diary
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (baseline, 0 week)
dysmenorrhea. A higher score indicates worse pain.
Pre-intervention (baseline, 0 week)
Dysmenorrhea daily diary
Time Frame: Post-intervention at 12 weeks
The Dysmenorrhea daily diary is a questionnaire to measure the severity of dysmenorrhea. A higher score indicates worse pain.
Post-intervention at 12 weeks
Dysmenorrhea daily diary
Time Frame: Post-intervention at 28 weeks
dysmenorrhea. A higher score indicates worse pain.
Post-intervention at 28 weeks
3-level version of EuroQol 5-Dimension
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The 3-level version of EuroQol 5-Dimension will be used to determine the quality of life. A higher score indicates better quality of life.
12 weeks
Cost-diary
Time Frame: 12 weeks
An electronic diary will be used to record cost expenditures in Hong Kong Dollars and work absenteeism
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

September 1, 2021

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

August 31, 2024

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

August 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 25, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

December 11, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

December 11, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Primary Dysmenorrhea

Clinical Trials on High-intensity aerobic training

3
Subscribe