- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04665661
Aerobic Exercise for Primary Dysmenorrhea
Aerobic Exercise for Primary Dysmenorrhea: A Mixed-methods Study and Economic Evaluation
Primary dysmenorrhea is common and can result in significant disability for many women, causing a high degree of discomfort and reduced quality of life (QoL). Our preliminary studies suggested that high-intensity aerobic training (HIAT) for 30 minutes, three times a week at 70%-85% of maximum heart rate was effective for decreasing pain and improving QoL in women suffering from primary dysmenorrhea. However, to date, no studies have evaluated the beneficial effects of HIAT on academic performance and absenteeism or the cost-effectiveness of HIAT for women with primary dysmenorrhea. Furthermore, the mechanisms underlying aerobic exercise-induced analgesia in primary dysmenorrhea remain unclear.
Here, we propose a study to address this important knowledge gap by investigating the effects of HIAT on absenteeism and academic performance among university students with primary dysmenorrhea and examine the physiological mechanisms underlying aerobic exercise-induced analgesia by conducting a fully powered, randomised, controlled crossover trial. We also propose to conduct an economic evaluation to determine the cost-effectiveness of HIAT compared with a wait-listed control group receiving usual care, according to the societal and healthcare perspectives of Hong Kong. The results of this cutting-edge research will be important for clinicians, researchers, policymakers, and women with primary dysmenorrhea. The knowledge gained from the proposed study will be useful for researchers when designing future studies to identify the mediators of pain interventions for clinical improvements, which could themselves be the target of future interventions. The findings of the proposed study will inform decision-makers regarding the extent to which existing or standard and potential interventions can improve population health (effectiveness) and the resources required to implement these interventions (costs).
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Objectives: (1): To evaluate the effectiveness of high-intensity aerobic training (HIAT) on pain intensity, absenteeism, and academic performance among university students with primary dysmenorrhea. (2): To investigate the physiological mechanism(s) underlying aerobic exercise-induced analgesia in women with primary dysmenorrhea. (3) Compare the cost-effectiveness of HIAT against that for usual care to treat pain associated with primary dysmenorrhea.
Design and subjects: A mixed-methods study, including a cross-over RCT, and semi-structured focus groups, alongside economic evaluation, will be conducted using 130 women with primary dysmenorrhea.
Interventions: Women will randomly allocated into high-intensity aerobic training (HIAT) or wait-list control (WLC) groups. Participants in the HIAT group will receive supervised treadmill training for the first 12 weeks of the trial. Following a four-week washout period the cross-over period will begin during Week 16, and the participants initially randomised to the WLC group will receive the HIAT regimen from Weeks 14-28. Participants initially randomized to HIAT group will be instructed not to engage in exercise during the remainder of the study period (i.e. Weeks 14-28).
Outcome measures: Pain intensity, absenteeism from university, academic performance, concentration, dysmenorrhea daily diary, and salivary progesterone and prostaglandin F2-alpha levels in saliva. The EQ-5D-3L will be used to determine the QoL for the HIAT and WLC groups.
Data analysis plan: A preliminary test using the independent samples t-test and a two-sided Student's unpaired t-test will be performed to rule out carryover effects and identify the within-participant differences in outcome variables between the study periods, respectively. Treatment effects will be evaluated using an ANOVA with a mixed-effects model considering the longitudinal repeated measures, including the effects of time within each study group and the interaction between time and intervention. The mediation effects will be assessed using the Sobel test. The EQ-5D responses will be converted into utility scores to estimate the gain or loss of quality-adjusted life-years (QUALYs). The seemingly unrelated regression (SUR) analyses will be used to estimate the total cost differences (ΔC) and effect differences (ΔE). Qualitative data will be analysed using the process of thematic analysis.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- women in the age group of 18-24 years old;
- non-pregnant;
- having regular menstrual cycles with cycle lengths between 24 and 30 days;
- experiencing an average menstrual pain intensity equal to or greater than 5 on a 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale; and
- scoring low (< 600 metabolic equivalent tasks [MET]/week) on the short-form of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire.
Exclusion Criteria:
- women using oral contraceptive pills, hormonal therapy, or intrauterine devices;
- women using over-the counter analgesics during menstruation to treat dysmenorrhea-associated pain and experience no pain relief with those analgesics; and
- women participating in any formal exercise programme
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
- Masking: TRIPLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
EXPERIMENTAL: High-intensity aerobic training (HIAT)
Women will perform treadmill-based aerobic exercise for three days a week, at 70%-85% of MHR for 30 minutes and perceived exertion of 14-16, based on the Borg RPE scale.
This range39 is considered to represent HIAT.
Aerobic training will be preceded by warm-up exercises for 10 minutes and followed by cool-down exercises for 10 minutes, at a perceived exertion of 11.0 (Borg RPE).
|
Women will perform treadmill-based aerobic exercise for three days a week, at 70%-85% of MHR for 30 minutes and perceived exertion of 14-16, based on the Borg RPE scale.
This range39 is considered to represent HIAT.
Aerobic training will be preceded by warm-up exercises for 10 minutes and followed by cool-down exercises for 10 minutes, at a perceived exertion of 11.0 (Borg RPE).
Women in the wait-list control group will be instructed to continue with their usual activities and manage their pain as normal (i.e., with analgesics).
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Wait-list control (WLC)
Women in the wait-list control group will be instructed to continue with their usual activities and manage their pain as normal (i.e., with analgesics).
|
Women will perform treadmill-based aerobic exercise for three days a week, at 70%-85% of MHR for 30 minutes and perceived exertion of 14-16, based on the Borg RPE scale.
This range39 is considered to represent HIAT.
Aerobic training will be preceded by warm-up exercises for 10 minutes and followed by cool-down exercises for 10 minutes, at a perceived exertion of 11.0 (Borg RPE).
Women in the wait-list control group will be instructed to continue with their usual activities and manage their pain as normal (i.e., with analgesics).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Pain intensity
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (baseline, 0 week)
|
Average pain intensity during the last 24 hours during menstruation will be assessed using the 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale, with 0 representing 'No pain' and 10 representing 'Worst imaginable pain'.
Higher scores indicate greater pain severity
|
Pre-intervention (baseline, 0 week)
|
Pain intensity
Time Frame: Post-intervention at 12 weeks
|
Average pain intensity during the last 24 hours during menstruation will be assessed using the 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale, with 0 representing 'No pain' and 10 representing 'Worst imaginable pain'.
Higher scores indicate greater pain severity
|
Post-intervention at 12 weeks
|
Pain intensity
Time Frame: Post-intervention at 28 weeks
|
Average pain intensity during the last 24 hours during menstruation will be assessed using the 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale, with 0 representing 'No pain' and 10 representing 'Worst imaginable pain'.
Higher scores indicate greater pain severity
|
Post-intervention at 28 weeks
|
Absenteeism from university
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (baseline, 0 week)
|
A prospective electronic diary will be provided for each participant to record university absenteeism.
|
Pre-intervention (baseline, 0 week)
|
Absenteeism from university
Time Frame: Post-intervention at 12 weeks
|
A prospective electronic diary will be provided for each participant to record university absenteeism.
|
Post-intervention at 12 weeks
|
Absenteeism from university
Time Frame: Post-intervention at 28 weeks
|
A prospective electronic diary will be provided for each participant to record university absenteeism.
|
Post-intervention at 28 weeks
|
Academic performance
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (baseline, 0 week)
|
Academic performance will be measured using the self-reported 20-item academic performance questionnaire, which was developed to measure the impacts of menstrual symptoms on academic performance.
Greater scores indicate greater severity of primary dysmenorrhea
|
Pre-intervention (baseline, 0 week)
|
Academic performance
Time Frame: Post-intervention at 12 weeks
|
Academic performance will be measured using the self-reported 20-item academic performance questionnaire, which was developed to measure the impacts of menstrual symptoms on academic performance.
Greater scores indicate greater severity of primary dysmenorrhea
|
Post-intervention at 12 weeks
|
Academic performance
Time Frame: Post-intervention at 28 weeks
|
Academic performance will be measured using the self-reported 20-item academic performance questionnaire, which was developed to measure the impacts of menstrual symptoms on academic performance.
Greater scores indicate greater severity of primary dysmenorrhea
|
Post-intervention at 28 weeks
|
Progesterone levels
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (baseline, 0 week)
|
Salivary levels of progesterone.
|
Pre-intervention (baseline, 0 week)
|
Progesterone levels
Time Frame: Post-intervention at 12 weeks
|
Salivary levels of progesterone.
|
Post-intervention at 12 weeks
|
Progesterone levels
Time Frame: Post-intervention at 28 weeks
|
Salivary levels of progesterone.
|
Post-intervention at 28 weeks
|
Prostaglandin F2-alpha levels
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (baseline, 0 week)
|
Salivary levels of prostaglandin F2-alpha
|
Pre-intervention (baseline, 0 week)
|
Prostaglandin F2-alpha levels
Time Frame: Post-intervention at 12 weeks
|
Salivary levels of prostaglandin F2-alpha
|
Post-intervention at 12 weeks
|
Prostaglandin F2-alpha levels
Time Frame: Post-intervention at 28 weeks
|
Salivary levels of prostaglandin F2-alpha
|
Post-intervention at 28 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Concentration
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (baseline, 0 week)
|
The 0-10 visual analogue scale will be used to measure the impact of dysmenorrhea on concentration, with 0 representing 'No difficulty concentrating' and 10 representing 'Maximum difficulty concentrating'.
|
Pre-intervention (baseline, 0 week)
|
Concentration
Time Frame: Post-intervention at 12 weeks
|
The 0-10 visual analogue scale will be used to measure the impact of dysmenorrhea on concentration, with 0 representing 'No difficulty concentrating' and 10 representing 'Maximum difficulty concentrating'.
|
Post-intervention at 12 weeks
|
Concentration
Time Frame: Post-intervention at 28 weeks
|
The 0-10 visual analogue scale will be used to measure the impact of dysmenorrhea on concentration, with 0 representing 'No difficulty concentrating' and 10 representing 'Maximum difficulty concentrating'.
|
Post-intervention at 28 weeks
|
Dysmenorrhea daily diary
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (baseline, 0 week)
|
dysmenorrhea.
A higher score indicates worse pain.
|
Pre-intervention (baseline, 0 week)
|
Dysmenorrhea daily diary
Time Frame: Post-intervention at 12 weeks
|
The Dysmenorrhea daily diary is a questionnaire to measure the severity of dysmenorrhea.
A higher score indicates worse pain.
|
Post-intervention at 12 weeks
|
Dysmenorrhea daily diary
Time Frame: Post-intervention at 28 weeks
|
dysmenorrhea.
A higher score indicates worse pain.
|
Post-intervention at 28 weeks
|
3-level version of EuroQol 5-Dimension
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
The 3-level version of EuroQol 5-Dimension will be used to determine the quality of life.
A higher score indicates better quality of life.
|
12 weeks
|
Cost-diary
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
An electronic diary will be used to record cost expenditures in Hong Kong Dollars and work absenteeism
|
12 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ANTICIPATED)
Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- APD
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Primary Dysmenorrhea
-
Cynthia del Rocío Márquez BeltránUniversity of HuelvaActive, not recruitingPrimary Dysmenorrhea | Menstrual Pain | Menstrual Distress \(Dysmenorrhea\)Spain
-
Istanbul Medipol University HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
Cairo UniversityNot yet recruitingPrimary Dysmenorrhea
-
Hacettepe UniversityRecruitingPrimary DysmenorrheaTurkey
-
Tokat Gaziosmanpasa UniversityRecruitingDysmenorrhea | Dysmenorrhea PrimaryTurkey
-
Cairo UniversityNot yet recruitingPrimary Dysmenorrhea
-
Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt UniversityNot yet recruitingPrimary Dysmenorrhea
-
Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Cairo UniversityCompleted
-
University of ValenciaCompleted
Clinical Trials on High-intensity aerobic training
-
Riphah International UniversityCompleted
-
General Hospital Murska SobotaUniversity of Primorska; University of LjubljanaUnknownCoronary Artery Disease | Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection FractionSlovenia
-
Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyCompleted
-
Riphah International UniversityCompletedPolycystic Ovary SyndromePakistan
-
Kuopio Research Institute of Exercise MedicineKuopio University Hospital; University of Basel; University of Eastern Finland; Social Insurance Institution, FinlandTerminatedUnstable Angina Pectoris | Acute Myocardial Infarction | Recurrent Myocardial InfarctionFinland
-
Universita di VeronaUnknown
-
Norwegian University of Science and TechnologySt. Olavs HospitalCompletedSubstance-Related DisordersNorway
-
Glostrup University Hospital, CopenhagenUnknownRheumatoid Arthritis | Sleep DisturbancesDenmark
-
University of ValenciaEuropean Regional Development Fund; Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Spain; Universitat Politècnica de València and other collaboratorsCompletedDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Spain
-
Universidade Federal de Sao CarlosConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoCompletedChronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseBrazil