Effectiveness of Tele-rheumatology for Delivering High Quality Rheumatology Care During the COVID-19 Crisis (EVOLVE)

January 31, 2024 updated by: Maria Danila, MD, MSc, MSPH, University of Alabama at Birmingham

Effectiveness of Tele-rheumatology for Delivering High Quality Rheumatology Care During the COVID-19 Crisis

While tele-rheumatology (TR) visits are a COVID-19 related necessity, there is a lack of rigorous data on the comparative effectiveness of TR versus (vs) in-person usual care (UC) especially in medically at-risk populations such as people with rheumatic and musculoskeletal disease (RMD) using immunosuppressive drugs (IS). This clear research gap was highlighted by the American College of Rheumatology in its recent Task Force Report on Telehealth in the COVID era. In this study, the investigators will rigorously evaluate the comparative effectiveness of TR visits for high risk people living with RMD and among those from socially vulnerable populations, in the COVID-19 era. This study is of key public health importance and relevance to rheumatology since it addresses the urgent clinical and policy needs to provide safe, efficacious, and equitable care to diverse patients with RMD during and beyond the COVID-19 crisis. Our proposal is very responsive to the RRF's Notice of Special interest on COVID-19 in improving the care of people with RMD during the COVID-19 pandemic. The investigators will perform the first randomized experiment of tele-rheumatology, generating high quality evidence to guide the use of this technology across diverse populations of people with RMDs. Beyond the high public health impact of this study for people with RMDs, the investigators expect that our findings will have high generalizability to other at-risk patient populations with multimorbidity and inform rheumatology practice into the foreseeable future.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

People with RMDs, especially those with multi-comorbidities and on IS are among the most at-risk for COVID-19-related fragmented care and poor outcomes. RMD burden is high in terms of disability-adjusted-life years (DALYs) and has been escalating. Beyond the prevailing challenges to in-person visits such as scheduling conflicts, transportation, or disability, the COVID-19 pandemic has further exacerbated RMD patient burden through disruptions in healthcare delivery (e.g. limited availability of in-person visits). Thus, high quality adaptations of healthcare services for people living with RMD including through TR in the context of the COVID-19 crisis are badly needed. The investigators found from a recent survey of 24,500 people living with RMD that 60% of respondents avoided in-person clinic visits. However, with the increasing availability of technology (90% Americans have internet access, 81% are online daily most patients and clinicians can engage in some form of TR. Due to widespread social distancing and major health policy changes necessitated by COVID-19, TR has been swiftly adopted (but minimally tested) as a means to deliver ongoing care for people with RMD. Because patients can be evaluated in their own homes, thus avoiding travel that increases COVID-19 risk, this approach provides means of healthcare for socially and medically vulnerable groups, such as those residing in rural areas and those with comorbidities, a group particularly at high risk of COVID-19 complications.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

652

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35294
        • University of Alabama at Birmingham

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of rheumatic disease (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis, SLE)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • unstable rheumatic disease that needs in-person visits (e.g. recent diagnosis of severe lupus nephritis)
  • expected in-office procedures (e.g., joint injection)
  • lack of access to phone

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Tele-rheumatology first visit and Usual Care second visit
Participants randomized to this visit will receive a tele-rheumatology visit first.
Participants will receive virtual visits via video conferencing and/or phone.
Experimental: Usual Care first visit and Tele-rheumatology second visit
Participants randomized to this visit will receive a usual care visit first.
Participants will receive virtual visits via video conferencing and/or phone.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 36-72 hours post visit after the first visit
Patient satisfaction with type visit. Assessed with AHRQ's Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS)® survey
36-72 hours post visit after the first visit

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient preference
Time Frame: 36-72 hours post visit, after the second visit
Patient preference with type visit. Assessed using "If you had a choice, what type of visit would you prefer?" with options a. telemedicine, b. in-office
36-72 hours post visit, after the second visit

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 15, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 6, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 8, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

January 11, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 2, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 31, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB-300006553

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rheumatic Diseases

Clinical Trials on Tele-rheumatology

3
Subscribe